Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #63096 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2024-12-26 08:41 -0500 |
| Last post | 2025-01-03 11:32 +0100 |
| Articles |
20 on this page of 1000+
— 42 participants
Thread has 1322 articles; only the first 1000 are indexed. |
Back to article view | Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Browse in flat view
Thread has 1322 articles; showing the first 1000 in depth-first order. Use the flat group view to see the rest.
GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-26 08:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-26 17:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 10:57 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-26 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 11:59 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-26 20:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 12:37 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 14:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 14:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2024-12-27 10:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-27 16:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-28 07:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-28 15:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <Physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 14:51 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 11:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 17:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 14:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2024-12-29 16:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 17:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 04:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-30 09:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 08:40 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-30 23:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 18:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-31 03:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 11:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-31 20:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 10:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-31 06:04 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 09:39 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-31 17:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-31 18:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 13:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 19:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-28 13:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-27 12:22 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2024-12-27 07:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2024-12-27 08:00 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-26 20:52 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-27 09:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-27 10:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-27 06:34 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 00:10 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 08:22 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2024-12-28 11:04 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fflud@gnu.rocks> - 2024-12-28 17:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2024-12-28 12:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-28 12:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-28 19:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Diego Garcia <dg@chaos.rocks> - 2024-12-28 19:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-28 23:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-28 23:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2024-12-29 09:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 22:02 +0000
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 18:56 -0500
Re: GIMP (and digiKam and other photo management programs) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-12-30 04:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 10:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-12-31 02:49 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 13:23 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-12-29 11:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-29 21:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lem Novantotto <Lem@none.invalid> - 2024-12-28 20:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 00:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2024-12-29 01:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-12-29 01:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2024-12-29 21:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 (and digiKam and showFoto) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2024-12-29 14:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-29 08:15 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-29 12:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-29 07:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-30 12:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-30 10:15 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-12-31 07:31 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-12-31 12:40 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 08:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-12-31 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 01:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-01 07:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2024-12-31 21:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 12:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-01 21:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-01 21:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 23:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 02:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:30 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 20:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-03 01:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 03:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:32 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:13 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 06:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 08:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 14:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-03 11:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 16:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-03 13:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 01:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:13 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-04 06:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-04 10:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-04 15:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 23:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 12:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 09:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-05 10:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-04 13:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-04 15:54 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 00:11 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 TJ <TJ@noneofyour.business> - 2025-01-05 10:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-05 13:22 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 08:49 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 15:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 14:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 19:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-06 15:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-06 16:20 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-06 17:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 08:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 09:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 11:26 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 11:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 13:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 13:30 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 13:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 14:07 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 09:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-07 16:35 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-07 21:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-08 09:45 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-07 22:47 +0000
Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 02:49 +0000
Re: Time machine backups vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 04:22 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 14:25 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:21 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:58 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 14:37 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:25 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-01-08 18:28 +0000
Re: Time machine backups Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 19:24 +0000
Re: Time machine backups vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 20:27 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:05 +0100
Re: Time machine backups "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:47 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:19 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:51 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:37 +0000
Re: Time machine backups D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:02 +0100
Re: Time machine backups The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-07 20:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:03 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-08 16:45 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 17:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 20:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 09:58 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-09 15:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 18:50 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 10:20 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 18:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 04:09 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 04:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-10 06:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 00:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 21:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-11 07:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 10:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 19:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:02 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-09 06:56 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 18:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 19:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-09 08:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-09 16:14 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 17:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 02:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 08:59 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-09 17:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 06:55 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-10 09:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-10 13:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-10 16:20 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-11 07:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-11 07:21 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-11 08:28 -0500
What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-12 06:45 -0500
Re: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v (was: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1) chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-12 07:43 -0600
TL;DR: cry harder! (was: What change of position? YA unsubstantiated claim from luzer-v) -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-12 14:08 -0500
Re: TL;DR: idiot and liar claims "victory"! chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-12 22:50 -0600
Climate change mitigations Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-08 02:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2025-01-07 16:10 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 16:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-07 17:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 07:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 08:59 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 15:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 11:27 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 13:05 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 14:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 23:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 13:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 12:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:39 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 20:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:35 +0000
Races, Tribes and other ethnicities Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-15 02:33 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-15 06:30 +0200
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 00:49 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:12 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:53 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:55 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 18:28 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 22:16 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:21 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:05 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:11 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:52 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:19 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:49 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 22:51 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:46 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:51 +0100
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:51 +0000
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:17 -0500
Re: Races, Tribes and other ethnicities rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 06:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 09:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 22:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 00:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 22:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:04 +0000
Tribes and Ethnicities Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-16 13:30 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-16 20:36 +0200
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 18:50 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 21:15 +0100
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:41 +0000
Re: Tribes and Ethnicities D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 16:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:22 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 22:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:25 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:21 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 10:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 23:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 10:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-18 19:39 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-19 18:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 23:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-19 18:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-16 08:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 21:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-13 05:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 04:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:28 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 20:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:00 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 10:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 17:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 22:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:27 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:29 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:26 +0000
Biker Gangs Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-14 17:43 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 22:02 +0100
Re: Biker Gangs rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 02:11 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:04 +0100
Re: Biker Gangs The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-15 10:50 +0000
Re: Biker Gangs D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 18:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 21:53 +0000
Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-14 17:40 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 01:57 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 00:29 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 06:27 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 01:51 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:11 +0100
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-15 23:06 +0000
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 11:56 +0100
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-15 23:39 -0500
Re: Culture clashes in Manufacturing and elsewhere D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:31 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 19:39 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:13 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 13:55 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-08 14:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 14:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Beavis <beavis@corn.holio> - 2025-01-09 04:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 10:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 10:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 11:27 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 11:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 11:51 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 02:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> - 2025-01-09 11:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-09 11:47 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-09 12:12 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-08 19:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-08 12:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-06 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-02-08 06:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 02:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 13:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 18:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-08 18:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 13:41 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:23 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:07 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 20:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 20:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-10 23:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 11:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 20:03 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:43 +0000
Business cultures Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 20:32 +0000
Re: Business cultures D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:11 +0100
Re: Business cultures rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:15 +0000
Re: Business cultures rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:46 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-09 12:28 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 18:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 19:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 13:55 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 14:13 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 20:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-02-11 07:23 +1000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:31 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 07:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 03:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 18:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 22:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 21:54 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 09:30 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-11 07:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 07:53 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 23:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 08:17 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 20:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 13:21 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-13 21:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 17:09 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 14:54 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 04:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 23:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 11:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:10 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 22:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-14 20:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 22:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-14 09:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-15 23:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-19 20:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-16 11:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-13 08:03 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 18:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-15 21:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 03:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-02-15 22:51 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-16 04:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-02-16 01:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-13 07:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 21:10 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-02-15 07:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:57 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 02:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 23:06 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 06:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 14:23 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-09 22:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-09 21:06 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 08:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:18 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 15:56 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:08 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:14 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:26 +0000
Traveling and Travel Planning Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 20:10 +0000
Re: Traveling and Travel Planning rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:44 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:37 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 19:55 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-02-12 19:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 22:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 03:56 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 22:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-12 22:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-13 22:00 +0100
Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-11 19:59 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:07 +0100
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 22:31 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:35 +0100
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-12 19:17 +0000
Re: Travel Planning (was: Tasks where AI might be helpful) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 19:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:35 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 07:48 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 20:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 20:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 03:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 00:53 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:01 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 12:10 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 07:55 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 21:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-11 22:04 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 23:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:42 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:37 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:30 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:14 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-11 21:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-12 11:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 16:00 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:26 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:25 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 22:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-08 23:41 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:42 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:38 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 07:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:17 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 22:41 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:40 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-09 23:03 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 16:03 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-08 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-08 22:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 % <pursent100@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 14:23 -0700
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-10 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 19:11 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-11 05:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-02-11 05:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-10 18:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-10 15:55 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 01:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 00:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 06:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 02:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-11 19:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 20:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 02:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-11 22:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 06:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 12:25 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-02-12 10:16 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-12 18:40 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 18:50 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 16:24 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-13 11:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-02-12 09:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-12 18:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 16:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-13 07:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-12 20:20 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-12 17:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-02-14 05:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 22:44 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:51 +0000
(Excessive?) Complexity Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-08 18:57 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-08 19:31 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 23:23 -0500
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 11:45 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:49 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:39 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-11 13:21 -0600
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-02-09 22:43 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-09 20:56 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-09 22:50 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 07:50 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-02-10 08:35 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:20 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 19:02 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 12:09 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-10 18:58 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-02-10 22:42 +0100
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-02-09 11:32 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-02-09 19:43 +0000
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity "WokieSux282@ud0s4.net" <WokieSux283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-02-08 22:49 -0500
Re: (Excessive?) Complexity vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - 2025-02-25 19:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 11:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 19:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 13:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 09:02 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 15:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 11:32 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:14 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-08 15:00 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 20:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 10:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 11:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:28 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:50 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:52 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-09 17:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:42 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:17 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 12:02 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:54 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-14 00:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:15 -0500
The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:15 +0000
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:47 +0100
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 14:17 +0000
Re: The Joys of African (and other 3rd world) construction projects D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 21:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:04 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 11:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-09 15:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 07:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-10 03:34 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-10 09:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 01:15 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-10 07:12 -0500
Diversity - good or bad ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-10 21:17 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 22:45 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-11 01:11 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Steve Hayes <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> - 2025-01-11 05:23 +0200
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 00:48 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 07:02 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 09:00 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 19:50 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:19 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:02 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 22:19 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 06:51 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:09 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 20:46 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:48 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 00:43 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:05 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:49 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-01-12 14:06 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:40 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 13:46 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 14:00 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:52 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-12 17:09 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:42 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:51 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:32 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:03 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-14 00:52 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-14 04:13 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 04:18 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 21:55 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 21:11 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-14 12:28 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-14 22:00 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-14 23:15 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:07 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:16 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-15 06:18 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-15 10:13 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-16 00:28 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-16 11:27 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-16 14:39 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:01 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-17 11:10 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 23:30 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-16 16:57 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-16 20:59 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:15 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:40 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:40 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:42 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-19 11:44 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-17 01:41 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-17 10:55 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-17 19:44 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 11:41 +0100
Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-18 14:46 +0000
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-18 15:03 +0000
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-18 18:07 +0100
Re: Scandinavian Humor and Other Myths rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-18 19:36 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-12 18:53 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:06 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-13 16:17 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:51 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:23 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:40 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 17:08 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 00:31 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:33 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-12 17:06 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-12 18:53 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:16 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:51 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 20:48 +0100
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2025-01-13 16:17 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:24 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:32 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-12 21:47 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 02:41 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) root <NoEMail@home.org> - 2025-01-13 03:00 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:47 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 22:56 +0000
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:29 -0500
Re: New Pi 5 (Diversity - good or bad ?) rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:24 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:23 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:10 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 11:53 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:56 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:13 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 09:21 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 14:58 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:44 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 11:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 19:36 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 20:30 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-13 10:20 +0100
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 04:32 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 12:03 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-12 23:42 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-13 10:38 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-13 13:11 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:04 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 19:52 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:21 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:23 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:00 -0500
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 06:59 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:46 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 20:54 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:44 +0000
Re: Diversity - good or bad ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 10:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-10 22:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-11 20:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-11 21:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:33 +0000
The Joys of Motorola Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-12 14:40 +0000
Re: The Joys of Motorola rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 00:19 +0000
Re: The Joys of Motorola "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 03:56 -0500
Re: The Joys of Motorola rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 23:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 19:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 02:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-11 23:08 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 07:05 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-12 12:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-12 21:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 00:21 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-13 06:17 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-13 03:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-14 03:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-14 03:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-11 12:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-12 00:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 22:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-05 18:01 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-04 15:51 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 23:31 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 12:57 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2025-01-05 16:45 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-05 17:31 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-05 23:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-06 02:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-06 12:12 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:41 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:53 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 19:01 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-06 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 20:38 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 04:58 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-08 00:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:38 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 10:50 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:48 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:35 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 12:49 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-07 11:46 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 11:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-07 23:14 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:24 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 11:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 17:59 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-08 11:03 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 20:17 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 02:47 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 07:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:32 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-07 18:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-07 19:46 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2025-01-07 16:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-07 22:29 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 00:57 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lars Poulsen <lars@cleo.beagle-ears.com> - 2025-01-07 18:27 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:22 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 14:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 20:56 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-05 21:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 16:37 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:45 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:34 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 05:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:28 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 01:21 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 23:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-06 11:47 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 10:12 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:16 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-01-03 19:26 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Jack Sovalot <hee-cawkforme@jack.sovalot> - 2025-01-06 12:28 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-03 12:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 23:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:51 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 05:36 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:26 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 pH <wNOSPAMp@gmail.org> - 2025-01-03 19:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-03 19:59 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 21:37 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:43 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 02:06 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 00:23 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:16 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 20:48 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:36 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 07:29 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 12:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:18 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 06:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:30 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:07 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:44 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 18:19 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 12:58 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:35 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 02:16 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:19 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-06 22:52 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 10:54 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-07 13:23 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-07 18:49 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 01:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 12:00 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-08 17:25 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2025-01-08 18:34 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-08 18:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 18:55 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-09 18:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-11 13:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 00:51 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 00:19 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 06:08 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-09 02:24 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 19:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-09 19:05 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-09 19:53 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-04 10:05 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 22:11 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-04 23:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 00:43 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-04 19:20 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 01:06 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> - 2025-01-03 20:36 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 02:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:56 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 09:39 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-04 10:15 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-04 21:04 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-05 00:06 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-04 12:12 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-05 01:24 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-05 13:15 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-04 02:43 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Robert Riches <spamtrap42@jacob21819.net> - 2025-01-05 03:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-01-01 17:31 -0600
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-01-02 08:21 -0800
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-01 21:33 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-01 23:26 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-02 01:42 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-02 01:52 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-01-02 02:09 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2025-01-02 04:05 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:27 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-01-02 10:18 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 D <nospam@example.net> - 2025-01-02 12:33 +0100
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2025-01-03 01:35 -0500
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-01-03 08:30 +0000
Re: GIMP 3.0.0-RC1 "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-01-03 11:32 +0100
Page 11 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 50 Next page →
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 09:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlqqk7$3tscn$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64115 |
On 10/01/2025 09:35, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 1/10/25 4:19 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >> On 10/01/2025 09:09, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> On 1/10/25 2:31 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>> On 09/01/2025 23:31, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>> Now 100+ years from now, if all remains constant, the >>>>> ice will have melted back some more and there might be >>>>> a more useful exposed rim. >>>> >>>> Go and calculate the mass of ice on Greenland, and its latent heat >>>> of melting, and divide that by a hundred years and tell me that >>>> somehow the sun is going to provide that level of excess energy to >>>> the planet . >>> >>> As I said elsewhere, I don't see Greenland melting >>> anytime soon. 'Climate' suffers 'cooling periods' >>> roughly every 500 years - often driven by massive >>> Indonesian volcanic events (sometimes asteroids). >>> Iceland may sometimes play a role. >>> >>> I think Greenland is mostly 'cycling' - right now >>> it's slowly melting but sometime soon the climate >>> may change a few degrees and it'll build up a lot >>> more ice again. >>> >>>> The ice age didn't end in a century. In fact it hasn't ended, >>>> technically. We are in an interstadial. >>> >>> Well ... the 'main part' of the last ice age DID >>> end pretty abruptly in terms of geological time. >>> Nobody is sure exactly why - all the factors that >>> co-contributed. My GUESS is that sea levels got >>> low enough to destabilize the methane hydrate >>> deposits. There may be proxy evidence - we'll see. >>> >>>> But the point is it took thousands of years for the ice to melt. >>> >>> Well ... more like maybe 1000 years. >>> >> While the Younger Dryas feature abrupt and massive atmospheric >> climate change over a few decades - way more than any modern warming >> or cooling - it did not immediately melt all of the ice. >> >> https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level_rise2.png > > > These events have "curves". ALL the ice doesn't form, > or melt, overnight. The BULK may change quickly but > there's always a long 'shadow'. > > Right NOW we're still in the shadow of the last Big > Freeze. > > >> Shows the actual sea level rises and the full de glaciation took *over >> 6000* years. >> >> And continues albeit at a far slower pace, to ythis day. >> >> Mountains of ice do not melt in a day, or a week, or a decade or even >> a millennium >> >> >>> The bullshit "world flood" then happened >>> as ice-dams and such failed and sent Huge >>> quantities of water down river tracts in >>> the northern hemisphere. I can see why so >>> many people imagined the entire world was >>> flooded. >>> >>> Thing is, the last Big Freeze happened really >>> quick too. SOME evidence points to an asteroid >>> hitting arctic Canada or Greenland. >>> >> IT may have heppened quickly, but the ice did not form overnight. >> >>> All the causes/equations are difficult, hard to >>> pin down, but not impossible. 25 years from now >>> we'll have a much better picture. Might even be >>> able to take advantage. >> >> The main facts are known. No matter what happens in the atmosphere, >> miles deep ice sheets to not melt overnight, and nor does deep >> permafrost. >> >> You have to be particularly ignorant of physics to believe otherwise. >> >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat > > Ummm ... don't think I'm "pretty ignorant" at all, > have always researched this kind of stuff. > Its not a matter of resaearchm, but of phyics, and oif yoiu had reaqearched te grpah I indicated it show exactly how the oice melted and sea levels roise ovre a 600 year period of constant steady > As said, 'curves'. No. Virtually a straight line,. Post the Younger Dryas, ice started melting and sea level rose a a steady rate for the next 6000 years. That was the 10% to 90%, and we have hadanother 5% since then, riughly. The 90% is kinda volatile > but the 10% sticks around for a long time, > maybe seeds the NEXT cycle's curve. > > It's been about 55 million years since it ALL > melted ... tropical jungle pole to pole. It's > been longer since it ALL froze. Mostly we > drift back and forth along a rough center line. > MANY factors seem to drive the cycles. Yes but that is hand-wavy BS and doesn't really help answer the question of whether or not Greenland will be ice free in 100 years. And the physics says no. Latent heat of melting is simply too massive for that ice sheet. You are in this matter plain *wrong*. https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level_rise2.png Clearly shows rate of melt, but you ignored the [f]actual data. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat Shows the underlying physics, that you hand waved away. -- All political activity makes complete sense once the proposition that all government is basically a self-legalising protection racket, is fully understood.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 06:17 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vlqvju$3v05n$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64116 |
On 1/10/25 4:52 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 10/01/2025 09:35, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> On 1/10/25 4:19 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 10/01/2025 09:09, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> On 1/10/25 2:31 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> On 09/01/2025 23:31, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>>> Now 100+ years from now, if all remains constant, the >>>>>> ice will have melted back some more and there might be >>>>>> a more useful exposed rim. >>>>> >>>>> Go and calculate the mass of ice on Greenland, and its latent heat >>>>> of melting, and divide that by a hundred years and tell me that >>>>> somehow the sun is going to provide that level of excess energy to >>>>> the planet . >>>> >>>> As I said elsewhere, I don't see Greenland melting >>>> anytime soon. 'Climate' suffers 'cooling periods' >>>> roughly every 500 years - often driven by massive >>>> Indonesian volcanic events (sometimes asteroids). >>>> Iceland may sometimes play a role. >>>> >>>> I think Greenland is mostly 'cycling' - right now >>>> it's slowly melting but sometime soon the climate >>>> may change a few degrees and it'll build up a lot >>>> more ice again. >>>> >>>>> The ice age didn't end in a century. In fact it hasn't ended, >>>>> technically. We are in an interstadial. The rate of change is the tricky part - even the Ice Ages showed us that a change over 10,000 years is too rapid for species to adapt and not go extinct. And for Greenland's ice, a lot of it is already doomed to melt, because of the Earth's total energy imbalance has roughly doubled in the past 50 years, so it is additional thermal energy in the system that's going to have to do/go somewhere: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth%27s_energy_budget#Earth's_energy_imbalance_(EEI)> TL;DR: its why sea level has risen by +4" since 1993. >>>> Well ... the 'main part' of the last ice age DID >>>> end pretty abruptly in terms of geological time. >>>> Nobody is sure exactly why - all the factors that >>>> co-contributed. My GUESS is that sea levels got >>>> low enough to destabilize the methane hydrate >>>> deposits. There may be proxy evidence - we'll see. >>>> >>>>> But the point is it took thousands of years for the ice to melt. >>>> >>>> Well ... more like maybe 1000 years. >>>> >>> While the Younger Dryas feature abrupt and massive atmospheric >>> climate change over a few decades - way more than any modern warming >>> or cooling - it did not immediately melt all of the ice. >>> >>> https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Post- >>> Glacial_Sea_Level_rise2.png >> >> >> These events have "curves". ALL the ice doesn't form, >> or melt, overnight. The BULK may change quickly but >> there's always a long 'shadow'. >> >> Right NOW we're still in the shadow of the last Big >> Freeze. >> >> >>> Shows the actual sea level rises and the full de glaciation took >>> *over 6000* years. >>> >>> And continues albeit at a far slower pace, to ythis day. >>> >>> Mountains of ice do not melt in a day, or a week, or a decade or even >>> a millennium >>> >>> >>>> The bullshit "world flood" then happened >>>> as ice-dams and such failed and sent Huge >>>> quantities of water down river tracts in >>>> the northern hemisphere. I can see why so >>>> many people imagined the entire world was >>>> flooded. >>>> >>>> Thing is, the last Big Freeze happened really >>>> quick too. SOME evidence points to an asteroid >>>> hitting arctic Canada or Greenland. >>>> >>> IT may have heppened quickly, but the ice did not form overnight. >>> >>>> All the causes/equations are difficult, hard to >>>> pin down, but not impossible. 25 years from now >>>> we'll have a much better picture. Might even be >>>> able to take advantage. >>> >>> The main facts are known. No matter what happens in the atmosphere, >>> miles deep ice sheets to not melt overnight, and nor does deep >>> permafrost. >>> >>> You have to be particularly ignorant of physics to believe otherwise. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat >> >> Ummm ... don't think I'm "pretty ignorant" at all, >> have always researched this kind of stuff. >> > Its not a matter of resaearchm, but of phyics, and oif yoiu had > reaqearched te grpah I indicated it show exactly how the oice melted and > sea levels roise ovre a 600 year period of constant steady Because its effectively an integration function, so it doesn't correlate as neatly to the source energy input change causing the melt/freeze. >> As said, 'curves'. > > No. Virtually a straight line,. > > > Post the Younger Dryas, ice started melting and sea level rose a a > steady rate for the next 6000 years. > > That was the 10% to 90%, and we have hadanother 5% since then, riughly. Contemplate rate of change: it wasn't until the rate de-accelerated in ~8000 BC that the environment became stable enough for humans to develop agriculture and give rise to civilization. > > The 90% is kinda volatile >> but the 10% sticks around for a long time, >> maybe seeds the NEXT cycle's curve. >> >> It's been about 55 million years since it ALL >> melted ... tropical jungle pole to pole. It's >> been longer since it ALL froze. Mostly we >> drift back and forth along a rough center line. >> MANY factors seem to drive the cycles. > > Yes but that is hand-wavy BS and doesn't really help answer the question > of whether or not Greenland will be ice free in 100 years. > > And the physics says no. Latent heat of melting is simply too massive > for that ice sheet. One needs to start at first principles of excess heat added to the system, and then determine how it is distributed. Some is going to go to Greenland, sure, but there's also the other 97% of the world too. > > You are in this matter plain *wrong*. > > https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Post- > Glacial_Sea_Level_rise2.png > Clearly shows rate of melt, but you ignored the [f]actual data. Be aware that that graph is ~20 years out of date. As is a lot of other references on that website. However, this page of theirs does illustrate some of the thermal hook that was already occurring prior to where a lot of their data ends in 2004: <https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/glaciers-and-climate/climate-change/> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat > Shows the underlying physics, that you hand waved away. Which is precisely why having already observed +4" (+110mm) of sea level rise over 30 years should scare the living hell out of you. Earth's oceans' volume is 1.335 billion cubic kilometers Surface area of Earth covered by water is 361 million km^2, which means that dividing gives an average depth = 3.698 km = 3698 meters. A 4" (110mm) rise is an increase of +0.00002975 (= +0.002975%), which based on water's thermal coefficient of expansion is 210 x 10-6 (1/ºC) means an average temperature rise of 0.00002975/210 x 10-6 (1/ºC) = +0.142 C Now that value might not seem to be all that much, but it is an average across the entire 3698m deep water column, and so one can then also use the latent heat of water ... 4186 J/kg·K (1 cal/g·C) ... to determine how much energy must have already been added to the oceans since 1993. Volume of 1.335 billion km^3 * 1e+12 liters/km^3 * 4186 J/kg·K * 1kg/L = 1.355 E+9 * E+12 * 4.186 E+3 = 5.672 E+24 Joules: estimate of excess heat already absorbed. For context, Hiroshima was 1.5 x 10^13 joules of heating, so: (5.672 E+24 J)/(1.5 E+13 J) = ~3.78 E+11 Hiroshima equivalents Over (2024-1993) 31 years, its ~12 billion Hiroshima bombs per year. -hh
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 00:25 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <t92dnV0_JJJcnR_6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64116 |
On 1/10/25 4:52 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 10/01/2025 09:35, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> On 1/10/25 4:19 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 10/01/2025 09:09, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> On 1/10/25 2:31 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>>>> On 09/01/2025 23:31, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>>>> Now 100+ years from now, if all remains constant, the >>>>>> ice will have melted back some more and there might be >>>>>> a more useful exposed rim. >>>>> >>>>> Go and calculate the mass of ice on Greenland, and its latent heat >>>>> of melting, and divide that by a hundred years and tell me that >>>>> somehow the sun is going to provide that level of excess energy to >>>>> the planet . >>>> >>>> As I said elsewhere, I don't see Greenland melting >>>> anytime soon. 'Climate' suffers 'cooling periods' >>>> roughly every 500 years - often driven by massive >>>> Indonesian volcanic events (sometimes asteroids). >>>> Iceland may sometimes play a role. >>>> >>>> I think Greenland is mostly 'cycling' - right now >>>> it's slowly melting but sometime soon the climate >>>> may change a few degrees and it'll build up a lot >>>> more ice again. >>>> >>>>> The ice age didn't end in a century. In fact it hasn't ended, >>>>> technically. We are in an interstadial. >>>> >>>> Well ... the 'main part' of the last ice age DID >>>> end pretty abruptly in terms of geological time. >>>> Nobody is sure exactly why - all the factors that >>>> co-contributed. My GUESS is that sea levels got >>>> low enough to destabilize the methane hydrate >>>> deposits. There may be proxy evidence - we'll see. >>>> >>>>> But the point is it took thousands of years for the ice to melt. >>>> >>>> Well ... more like maybe 1000 years. >>>> >>> While the Younger Dryas feature abrupt and massive atmospheric >>> climate change over a few decades - way more than any modern warming >>> or cooling - it did not immediately melt all of the ice. >>> >>> https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level_rise2.png >> >> >> >> These events have "curves". ALL the ice doesn't form, >> or melt, overnight. The BULK may change quickly but >> there's always a long 'shadow'. >> >> Right NOW we're still in the shadow of the last Big >> Freeze. >> >> >>> Shows the actual sea level rises and the full de glaciation took >>> *over 6000* years. >>> >>> And continues albeit at a far slower pace, to ythis day. >>> >>> Mountains of ice do not melt in a day, or a week, or a decade or even >>> a millennium >>> >>> >>>> The bullshit "world flood" then happened >>>> as ice-dams and such failed and sent Huge >>>> quantities of water down river tracts in >>>> the northern hemisphere. I can see why so >>>> many people imagined the entire world was >>>> flooded. >>>> >>>> Thing is, the last Big Freeze happened really >>>> quick too. SOME evidence points to an asteroid >>>> hitting arctic Canada or Greenland. >>>> >>> IT may have heppened quickly, but the ice did not form overnight. >>> >>>> All the causes/equations are difficult, hard to >>>> pin down, but not impossible. 25 years from now >>>> we'll have a much better picture. Might even be >>>> able to take advantage. >>> >>> The main facts are known. No matter what happens in the atmosphere, >>> miles deep ice sheets to not melt overnight, and nor does deep >>> permafrost. >>> >>> You have to be particularly ignorant of physics to believe otherwise. >>> >>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat >> >> Ummm ... don't think I'm "pretty ignorant" at all, >> have always researched this kind of stuff. >> > Its not a matter of resaearchm, but of phyics, and oif yoiu had > reaqearched te grpah I indicated it show exactly how the oice melted and > sea levels roise ovre a 600 year period of constant steady >> As said, 'curves'. > > No. Virtually a straight line,. > > > Post the Younger Dryas, ice started melting and sea level rose a a > steady rate for the next 6000 years. > > That was the 10% to 90%, and we have hadanother 5% since then, riughly. > > The 90% is kinda volatile >> but the 10% sticks around for a long time, >> maybe seeds the NEXT cycle's curve. >> >> It's been about 55 million years since it ALL >> melted ... tropical jungle pole to pole. It's >> been longer since it ALL froze. Mostly we >> drift back and forth along a rough center line. >> MANY factors seem to drive the cycles. > > Yes but that is hand-wavy BS and doesn't really help answer the question > of whether or not Greenland will be ice free in 100 years. > > And the physics says no. Latent heat of melting is simply too massive > for that ice sheet. > > You are in this matter plain *wrong*. Ummmm ... SAID that I don't see Greenland melting, esp not anytime soon (geologically). Next cool spell will build up more ice again. A problem in this thread is that so many people have said so many things ... they kinda get jumbled together. > https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Post-Glacial_Sea_Level_rise2.png > > Clearly shows rate of melt, but you ignored the [f]actual data. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat > Shows the underlying physics, that you hand waved away. I'm well aware of the heat involved in freezing/melting water ice. It's considerable. As such, you (and I) are correct that Greenland isn't gonna suddenly melt. It's one or two MILES of ice across a HUGE area. Don't care how many movies Dennis Quaid makes .....
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 09:23 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <93agP.87044$WVI1.82922@fx43.iad> |
| In reply to | #64114 |
On 2025-01-10 04:19, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 10/01/2025 09:09, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >> On 1/10/25 2:31 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote: >>> On 09/01/2025 23:31, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> Now 100+ years from now, if all remains constant, the >>>> ice will have melted back some more and there might be >>>> a more useful exposed rim. >>> >>> Go and calculate the mass of ice on Greenland, and its latent heat of >>> melting, and divide that by a hundred years and tell me that somehow >>> the sun is going to provide that level of excess energy to the planet . >> >> As I said elsewhere, I don't see Greenland melting >> anytime soon. 'Climate' suffers 'cooling periods' >> roughly every 500 years - often driven by massive >> Indonesian volcanic events (sometimes asteroids). >> Iceland may sometimes play a role. >> >> I think Greenland is mostly 'cycling' - right now >> it's slowly melting but sometime soon the climate >> may change a few degrees and it'll build up a lot >> more ice again. >> >>> The ice age didn't end in a century. In fact it hasn't ended, >>> technically. We are in an interstadial. >> >> Well ... the 'main part' of the last ice age DID >> end pretty abruptly in terms of geological time. >> Nobody is sure exactly why - all the factors that >> co-contributed. My GUESS is that sea levels got >> low enough to destabilize the methane hydrate >> deposits. There may be proxy evidence - we'll see. >> >>> But the point is it took thousands of years for the ice to melt. >> >> Well ... more like maybe 1000 years. >> > While the Younger Dryas feature abrupt and massive atmospheric climate > change over a few decades - way more than any modern warming or cooling > - it did not immediately melt all of the ice. > > https://www.antarcticglaciers.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Post- > Glacial_Sea_Level_rise2.png > > Shows the actual sea level rises and the full de glaciation took *over > 6000* years. > > And continues albeit at a far slower pace, to ythis day. > > Mountains of ice do not melt in a day, or a week, or a decade or even a > millennium Your friendly neighbourhood hippy would disagree. He expects that it will happen suddenly and swallow us all unless we throw whatever money we have at the sky... or give it to a faceless globalist elite. >> The bullshit "world flood" then happened >> as ice-dams and such failed and sent Huge >> quantities of water down river tracts in >> the northern hemisphere. I can see why so >> many people imagined the entire world was >> flooded. >> >> Thing is, the last Big Freeze happened really >> quick too. SOME evidence points to an asteroid >> hitting arctic Canada or Greenland. >> > IT may have heppened quickly, but the ice did not form overnight. Had it actually done so, we would have had stories or dangerous floods all over the world. Mind you, we have stories of land-consuming floods from thousands of years ago in pretty much every religion, but they never mention ice. >> All the causes/equations are difficult, hard to >> pin down, but not impossible. 25 years from now >> we'll have a much better picture. Might even be >> able to take advantage. > > The main facts are known. No matter what happens in the atmosphere, > miles deep ice sheets to not melt overnight, and nor does deep permafrost. > > You have to be particularly ignorant of physics to believe otherwise. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat If there is one thing hippies definitely are, it's ignorant. -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-10 21:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <ludjgfFcu8aU3@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64112 |
On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 04:09:09 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > The bullshit "world flood" then happened as ice-dams and such failed > and sent Huge quantities of water down river tracts in the northern > hemisphere. I can see why so many people imagined the entire world > was flooded. https://www.glaciallakemissoula.org/the-big-picture.html If there were humans hanging around eastern Washington that survived they had some pretty good stories. I think Some of the tribes in the area do have floods in their lore. Before I even knew the story I remember driving through the Washington scablands and thinking something interesting happened there.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 07:16 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vltnei$jubq$3@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64128 |
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 04:09:09 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>
>> The bullshit "world flood" then happened as ice-dams and such failed
>> and sent Huge quantities of water down river tracts in the northern
>> hemisphere. I can see why so many people imagined the entire world
>> was flooded.
>
> https://www.glaciallakemissoula.org/the-big-picture.html
>
> If there were humans hanging around eastern Washington that survived they
> had some pretty good stories. I think Some of the tribes in the area do
> have floods in their lore.
>
> Before I even knew the story I remember driving through the Washington
> scablands and thinking something interesting happened there.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Channeled_Scablands
Sorry for adding to the off-topic climate change flood here :-D
--
The computer should be doing the hard work. That's what it's paid to do,
after all.
-- Larry Wall in <199709012312.QAA08121@wall.org>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 10:55 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <vlori4$3e1r9$2@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64044 |
186282@ud0s4.net wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > On 1/9/25 9:58 AM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> On 2025-01-09 00:29, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>> On 1/8/25 8:18 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>> On 2025-01-08 19:42, rbowman wrote: >>>>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to >>>>>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the >>>>>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric >>>>>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military >>>>>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... >>>>> >>>>> https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ >>>>> >>>>> Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark >>>>> hasn't >>>>> done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and >>>>> certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland >>>>> feasible. >>>>> >>>>> Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who >>>>> knows. The >>>>> SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa. >>>> >>>> There will be lots of resistance simply because Canadians have >>>> traditionally seen themselves as "better" than Americans and don't >>>> want to be a part of the "inferior" culture. In reality, there is >>>> nothing better here except for the women in Quebec. They look better >>>> than what the US produces, but they're just as dim. >>> >>> Talk/jokes/etc aside, Canada will not be joined with >>> the USA any time soon. The culture/system/history is >>> just too different for a good fit. >> >> Loyalists vs rebels, yes. However, most of Canada is still Protestant so >> there is already similarity there. The United States has also been a >> melting pot traditionally, but now it is more of a multicultural society >> like Canada. Clearly, that's a bad thing, but it means that there is >> similarity. >> >>> Trump makes these statements For EFFECT ... not because >>> he's really serious. He mostly wants Canada to deal with >>> all the immigrants coming down. He's a native salesman >>> and thus creates grand illusions - intending to deal >>> somewhere to the middle. >>> >>> With Greenland, for example, it was barely a week after >>> he talked about buying/occupying that Denmark suddenly >>> put a LOT more money into defense efforts there. This >>> is more what he really wanted. As an actual territory, >>> Greenland would be a huge money-loser. SO, real world, >>> expect more EU and US military watch bases there. That >>> is 'good enough'. >> >> Militarily, I would imagine that having American bases in Greenland >> would be interesting to the Americans. They have a base pretty much >> everywhere else. > > > The US already HAS at least one active base there now. > Used to have more during the Cold War. > > Saw a docu recently about a base they embedded deep in > a glacier - complete with its own nuke reactor. Soon > found out that ice was not nearly as stable as they > imagined ... the whole thing kinda sunk in and fell > apart. > > Then a couple weeks ago there was a tourist photo of > that glacier ... bits of the mil base were now oozing > out the side of the ice. > > There are a number of micro-settlements all around > the Greenland coast. Hard to say how many are US > or EU radar stations - they won't tell. > > My grand-daddy visited Greenland in the late 1800s to > see if there were any farming prospects. Answer - NO ! > Can't even put in roads, gotta hop from fjord to fjord > by boat and the glaciers are too unstable to try and > drive on top of. Not to mention they're a mile or two deep! Been reading an interesting book "Climate Crash"; it starts out discussing exploration etc. of Greenland in the first 4 chapters. It's a little out-of-date (2005). -- X windows: The ultimate bottleneck. Flawed beyond belief. The only thing you have to fear. Somewhere between chaos and insanity. On autopilot to oblivion. The joke that kills. A disgrace you can be proud of. A mistake carried out to perfection. Belongs more to the problem set than the solution set. To err is X windows. Ignorance is our most important resource. Complex nonsolutions to simple nonproblems. Built to fall apart. Nullifying centuries of progress. Falling to new depths of inefficiency. The last thing you need. The defacto substandard. Elevating brain damage to an art form. X windows.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 19:00 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <DaOcnRN7K57N_h36nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com> |
| In reply to | #64049 |
On 1/9/25 10:55 AM, Chris Ahlstrom wrote: > 186282@ud0s4.net wrote this post while blinking in Morse code: > >> On 1/9/25 9:58 AM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> On 2025-01-09 00:29, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: >>>> On 1/8/25 8:18 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>> On 2025-01-08 19:42, rbowman wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to >>>>>>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the >>>>>>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric >>>>>>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military >>>>>>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... >>>>>> >>>>>> https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark >>>>>> hasn't >>>>>> done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and >>>>>> certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland >>>>>> feasible. >>>>>> >>>>>> Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who >>>>>> knows. The >>>>>> SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa. >>>>> >>>>> There will be lots of resistance simply because Canadians have >>>>> traditionally seen themselves as "better" than Americans and don't >>>>> want to be a part of the "inferior" culture. In reality, there is >>>>> nothing better here except for the women in Quebec. They look better >>>>> than what the US produces, but they're just as dim. >>>> >>>> Talk/jokes/etc aside, Canada will not be joined with >>>> the USA any time soon. The culture/system/history is >>>> just too different for a good fit. >>> >>> Loyalists vs rebels, yes. However, most of Canada is still Protestant so >>> there is already similarity there. The United States has also been a >>> melting pot traditionally, but now it is more of a multicultural society >>> like Canada. Clearly, that's a bad thing, but it means that there is >>> similarity. >>> >>>> Trump makes these statements For EFFECT ... not because >>>> he's really serious. He mostly wants Canada to deal with >>>> all the immigrants coming down. He's a native salesman >>>> and thus creates grand illusions - intending to deal >>>> somewhere to the middle. >>>> >>>> With Greenland, for example, it was barely a week after >>>> he talked about buying/occupying that Denmark suddenly >>>> put a LOT more money into defense efforts there. This >>>> is more what he really wanted. As an actual territory, >>>> Greenland would be a huge money-loser. SO, real world, >>>> expect more EU and US military watch bases there. That >>>> is 'good enough'. >>> >>> Militarily, I would imagine that having American bases in Greenland >>> would be interesting to the Americans. They have a base pretty much >>> everywhere else. >> >> >> The US already HAS at least one active base there now. >> Used to have more during the Cold War. >> >> Saw a docu recently about a base they embedded deep in >> a glacier - complete with its own nuke reactor. Soon >> found out that ice was not nearly as stable as they >> imagined ... the whole thing kinda sunk in and fell >> apart. >> >> Then a couple weeks ago there was a tourist photo of >> that glacier ... bits of the mil base were now oozing >> out the side of the ice. >> >> There are a number of micro-settlements all around >> the Greenland coast. Hard to say how many are US >> or EU radar stations - they won't tell. >> >> My grand-daddy visited Greenland in the late 1800s to >> see if there were any farming prospects. Answer - NO ! >> Can't even put in roads, gotta hop from fjord to fjord >> by boat and the glaciers are too unstable to try and >> drive on top of. > > Not to mention they're a mile or two deep! Hey, the "high road" fer sure ! :-) Alas while an aerial photo might make the glacial tops LOOK kinda flat and solid, they ain't. Big cracks constantly form, heal, and re-appear in new locations. It's not even suitable for hovercraft. So ... it's either aircraft or taking the little boat from fjord to fjord. It's not a people-friendly place and not 'modern'-people friendly either. If the USA wants to invest in far-northern defense installations, they might do better in Longyearbyen. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longyearbyen There are a number of islands, only one with any number of people. > Been reading an interesting book "Climate Crash"; it starts out discussing > exploration etc. of Greenland in the first 4 chapters. It's a little > out-of-date (2005). Seems that 'cooling events' happen for various reasons maybe every 4-500 years. Most common reason is some huge volcano near Indonesia blasting megatons of dust into the upper stratosphere. As such I don't see Greenland melting anytime soon - just "cycling" between slightly warmer and slightly cooler global climates. Alas the whole 'global warming' thing is no longer any sort of 'science' but politicized to the extreme. There's objective truth and then there's "political truth" - and the two rarely cross paths. Any supposed 'science' becomes totally contaminated with politically/ideologically biased results. Look into how long archeological/geological/ biological science went to great lengths to include the phony "world flood" into the equation. That there were many big LOCAL floods as the glacial sheet melted and seas slowly rose - didn't fit the popular religions. If they'd had "AI"s in the 18th century they'd have 'politically corrected' its answers to fit the current sure-nuf truths and religious assertions.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 18:27 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlp4ec$3fpg0$5@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64042 |
On 09/01/2025 14:58, CrudeSausage wrote: > Militarily, I would imagine that having American bases in Greenland > would be interesting to the Americans. They have a base pretty much > everywhere else. I think they have one already. "The first airports in Greenland were built by and for the United States defense. The first and largest was Kangerlussuaq Airport in 1941, followed by Narsarsuaq Airport in 1942 (and now-abandoned USAAF airfields Bluie East Two and Marrak Point, both in 1942) and Pituffik Space Base in 1953 (although Pituffik is not operated as a civilian airport) and Kulusuk Airport in 1956. Due to their distance from major settlements, these were not initially used for civilian travel." -- "I am inclined to tell the truth and dislike people who lie consistently. This makes me unfit for the company of people of a Left persuasion, and all women"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 19:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <46156c39-eba0-96ba-310c-bd02c6dafa4e@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64033 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > On 1/8/25 8:18 PM, CrudeSausage wrote: >> On 2025-01-08 19:42, rbowman wrote: >>> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >>> >>>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to >>>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the >>>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric >>>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military >>>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... >>> >>> https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ >>> >>> Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't >>> done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and >>> certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible. >>> >>> Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who knows. The >>> SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa. >> >> There will be lots of resistance simply because Canadians have >> traditionally seen themselves as "better" than Americans and don't want to >> be a part of the "inferior" culture. In reality, there is nothing better >> here except for the women in Quebec. They look better than what the US >> produces, but they're just as dim. > > Talk/jokes/etc aside, Canada will not be joined with > the USA any time soon. The culture/system/history is > just too different for a good fit. > > Trump makes these statements For EFFECT ... not because > he's really serious. He mostly wants Canada to deal with > all the immigrants coming down. He's a native salesman > and thus creates grand illusions - intending to deal > somewhere to the middle. > > With Greenland, for example, it was barely a week after > he talked about buying/occupying that Denmark suddenly > put a LOT more money into defense efforts there. This > is more what he really wanted. As an actual territory, > Greenland would be a huge money-loser. SO, real world, > expect more EU and US military watch bases there. That > is 'good enough'. This is the truth. The way to understand Trump is to look at what the man does, and not listen to what the man says. Europes politician still need to learn that lesson.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 19:02 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <1cf33e51-7f11-132b-a899-dd94eef3d534@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64030 |
On Wed, 8 Jan 2025, CrudeSausage wrote: > On 2025-01-08 19:42, rbowman wrote: >> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to >>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the >>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric >>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military >>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... >> >> https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ >> >> Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't >> done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and >> certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible. >> >> Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who knows. The >> SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa. > > There will be lots of resistance simply because Canadians have traditionally > seen themselves as "better" than Americans and don't want to be a part of the > "inferior" culture. In reality, there is nothing better here except for the > women in Quebec. They look better than what the US produces, but they're just > as dim. > This is very interesting. How much more beautiful on a scale from 1 to 10 would you say the women in Quebec are, than the women in the US? What made them so beautiful?
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 18:58 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlp67u$3fpg0$14@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64076 |
On 09/01/2025 18:02, D wrote: > How much more beautiful on a scale from 1 to > 10 would you say the women in Quebec are, than the women in the US? What > made them so beautiful? They are French. French women like sex, and like to be sexy. -- “Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,” – Ludwig von Mises
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 13:07 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <381c6c89-c1ac-ff3d-4dff-dc97d7fbd128@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64091 |
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 09/01/2025 18:02, D wrote: >> How much more beautiful on a scale from 1 to 10 would you say the women in >> Quebec are, than the women in the US? What made them so beautiful? > > They are French. French women like sex, and like to be sexy. Just like god intended!
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 06:56 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <nqhvnjdl1m2m2bo5egfotmavu3t96vd3qb@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #64028 |
rbowman wrote: >On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to >> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the >> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric >> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military >> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... > >https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ > >Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't >done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and >certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible. Greenland would be a great place to put all the wannabe migrants. Let them prove their worth there, for a few years, before letting them into the mainland.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 10:35 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <S0SfP.74678$vfee.5898@fx45.iad> |
| In reply to | #64040 |
On 2025-01-09 07:56, chrisv wrote: > rbowman wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to >>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the >>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric >>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military >>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... >> >> https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ >> >> Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't >> done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and >> certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible. > > Greenland would be a great place to put all the wannabe migrants. Let > them prove their worth there, for a few years, before letting them > into the mainland. After all, they're looking for safety and an opportunity to work. What's safer and more full of opportunity than Greenland? -- CrudeSausage Gab: @CrudeSausage Unapologetic paleoconservative
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rbowman <bowman@montana.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 18:52 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <luak7sFsh02U4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #64040 |
On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 06:56:46 -0600, chrisv wrote: > Greenland would be a great place to put all the wannabe migrants. Let > them prove their worth there, for a few years, before letting them into > the mainland. Norway tried that. "We're going to lodge you at a luxury resort -- north of the Arctic Circle" . https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-sweden- idUSKBN0U207Y20151219/ It's a paywall but you can see enough to get the idea.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 19:20 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlp7ip$3fpg0$16@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64088 |
On 09/01/2025 18:52, rbowman wrote: > On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 06:56:46 -0600, chrisv wrote: > >> Greenland would be a great place to put all the wannabe migrants. Let >> them prove their worth there, for a few years, before letting them into >> the mainland. > > Norway tried that. "We're going to lodge you at a luxury resort -- north > of the Arctic Circle" . > > https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-sweden- > idUSKBN0U207Y20151219/ > > It's a paywall but you can see enough to get the idea. Not paywalled for me... -- "Nature does not give up the winter because people dislike the cold." ― Confucius
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-11 13:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <3a7bf6b9-5044-d364-7b0e-9c977b255827@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64093 |
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > On 09/01/2025 18:52, rbowman wrote: >> On Thu, 09 Jan 2025 06:56:46 -0600, chrisv wrote: >> >>> Greenland would be a great place to put all the wannabe migrants. Let >>> them prove their worth there, for a few years, before letting them into >>> the mainland. >> >> Norway tried that. "We're going to lodge you at a luxury resort -- north >> of the Arctic Circle" . >> >> https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-sweden- >> idUSKBN0U207Y20151219/ >> >> It's a paywall but you can see enough to get the idea. > Not paywalled for me... You can just att arhive.is/... in front of it and most likely the paywall should be unlocked.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | D <nospam@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 19:01 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <9786b2ec-5515-4146-6afa-5c1833414419@example.net> |
| In reply to | #64028 |
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > >> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to >> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the >> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric >> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military >> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... > > https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ > > Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't > done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and > certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland feasible. > > Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who knows. The > SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa. > I don't understand why the US doesn't just bribe their way to greenland? Promise every inhabintant 1 MUSD in subsidies or some kind of government money, and then have a "vote". Since the EU is bound by democratic values, and, since greenland legally is allowed to vote for independence, they would be forced to accept a yes to greenlandish independence. Once independent, it is then up to them to discuss joining the US. Argument over, and the EU would not be able to criticize a democratic vote by the people.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2025-01-09 18:56 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <vlp65g$3fpg0$13@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #64075 |
On 09/01/2025 18:01, D wrote: > > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2025, rbowman wrote: > >> On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 17:53:21 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: >> >>> Someone was circulating the theory that Trump's (and Musk's) desire to >>> annex both Canada and Greenland is the result of wanting access to the >>> minerals there, which are crucial to the development of electric >>> vehicles. I would imagine that there are lots of strategic military >>> reasons too. Maybe the man isn't joking... >> >> https://www.gisreportsonline.com/r/china-arctic-russia/ >> >> Shipping, gas, oil, minerals, fisheries... Historically, Denmark hasn't >> done well protecting its interests since the Danish-Hanseatic War and >> certainly can't defend Greenland nor is an independent Greenland >> feasible. >> >> Canada is a far reach but with Trudeau the Lesser quitting, who knows. >> The >> SAM provinces might be weighing which is worse, DC or Ottawa. >> > > I don't understand why the US doesn't just bribe their way to greenland? > Promise every inhabintant 1 MUSD in subsidies or some kind of government > money, and then have a "vote". > > Since the EU is bound by democratic values, and, since greenland legally > is allowed to vote for independence, they would be forced to accept a > yes to greenlandish independence. > > Once independent, it is then up to them to discuss joining the US. > Greenalnd is not formally part of the EU any more. It is associated, only. > Argument over, and the EU would not be able to criticize a democratic > vote by the people. Wanna bet? Criticising peoples votes is a global fashion these days. -- “Progress is precisely that which rules and regulations did not foresee,” – Ludwig von Mises
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
Page 11 of 50 — ← Prev page 1 … 9 10 [11] 12 13 … 50 Next page →
Back to top | Article view | comp.os.linux.misc
csiph-web