Re: MS Access

From	Paul <nospam@needed.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.comp.os.windows-10, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: MS Access
Date	2024-08-15 14:53 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<v9lis2$12bf1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(21 earlier) <v9gkcv$30as$4@dont-email.me> <8WUuO.115458$COA2.7128@fx46.iad> <mYUuO.96295$YCP4.47958@fx47.iad> <MZOdnWbqhIRz_CH7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <li5e7sF9cmkU5@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, 8/15/2024 12:24 AM, vallor wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 03:50:58 -0400, "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net>
> wrote in <MZOdnWbqhIRz_CH7nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com>:
> 
>> On 8/13/24 10:50 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:
>>> On 2024-08-14, Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>> Oops, lost my response.  Let's try again...
>>>
>>>> On 2024-08-13, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 13 Aug 2024 01:51:25 -0400, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that a lot of companies - mostly as a result of having dumped
>>>>>> most of their IT people in favor of 'cloud' and 3rd-party management
>>>>>> - have a "M$ ONLY" policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> That would be “a diminishing number of companies”. Those that
>>>>> deliberately cripple their own competitiveness by restricting their
>>>>> technological choices are more likely to come a cropper in the
>>>>> marketplace. Either they go out of business, or they get acquired by
>>>>> some more successful company.
>>>>>
>>>>> Either way, the legacy Microsoft technologies gradually get phased
>>>>> out of the economic gene pool.
>>>
>>> Sounds like it's time for the re-education squad to pay a few visits.
>>>
>>> https://www.sandraandwoo.com/2016/06/09/0793-an-offer-you-cant-refuse-
> ww/
>>
>>    M$, and it's lawyers & suckers, have entirely different ideas - they
>>    WILL press, hard, for M$ dominance.
>>
>>    Technical superiority won't COUNT in most situations. M$ is - by
>>    effort/propaganda - THE de-facto standard. Doesn't matter how much it
>>    sucks.
>>
>>    This is the REALITY.
>>
>>    In the END M$ will absorb/destroy Linux - so we'd better have a good
>>    REPLACEMENT. Just sayin'
> 
> Hate to be the one to break it to you, but there is a
> Linux subsystem in Windows now.
> 
> Which is reasonable, considering that Linux dominates
> everywhere else _except_ the (shrinking) desktop market.
> 
> "Can't we all just get along?"
> 

And that's just it really.

Nobody in the C Suite, considers desktops to be worth chasing.
We'll do every thing with Cellphones. Need to compress 4TB of
files ? Your cellphone will do it. Need to run engineering software ?
Your cellphone will do it.

Since WSA was canceled, and WSL is still running (for now),
it was an "experiment to measure something". For Android, there
was no attachment. Initially WSL had no graphics, and the "cover story"
was that it was for "Azure users preparing images or something".
I used to run a separate X11 server back when there was no WSLg.
Now there is a WSLg. My most frequently run GUI application in
WSLg, is Linux Firefox. So I can manage more than one version of
Firefox, for various purposes. Presumably, my activities are being
measured (because there is a custom icon for Linux activity on TaskBar).

Microsoft initially had an "ecosystem play" with Windows 10. It
was supposed to "organize all your devices", like your <cough> Windows Phone.
Since that didn't seem to have the desired attach rate (and consequent
buy-into the Cloud), they have sought to build an ecosystem out
of "whatever shit sticks to". Take an item, build interconnect to it,
see what sticks. That to some extent, is what the experiments are about.

The reason Microsoft put ten billion into AI, is they have visions
of sugarplums, by renting tokens for a Cloud AI. And you can run up
a monthly billing, by having someone read Dad Jokes to you.
"That's where the real money is." It's in the same category as
Full Self Driving and Nuclear Fusion Power.

They're not building an OS, they're constructing Rental Accommodation.

They would be equally happy with 3 people paying $10000 a month,
as they would having 10000 people paying $3 per month. Success isn't
measured in head count, it is measured in dollars. They don't mind
if a few customers fall off the back of the cart.

And they usually make money, off every OEM PC sold. It does not matter
what the people do with the OEM PC when they get it.

   Paul

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-07-31 05:30 +0000
  Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-07-30 22:58 -0700
    Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-31 06:23 +0000
      Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-08-04 12:45 +0000
        Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-04 22:25 +0000
    Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-31 09:30 +0100
      Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-31 10:23 +0100
        Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-31 11:17 +0100
          Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2024-07-31 07:49 -0700
            Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-31 16:34 +0100
              Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday jgd@cix.co.uk (John Dallman) - 2024-07-31 17:45 +0100
                Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-08-01 01:45 +0000
              Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-31 17:55 +0100
                Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-01 09:39 +0100
                Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-01 10:35 +0100
    Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-07-31 13:41 +0000
      Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-31 17:52 +0100
    Linux at scale (was: Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-08-04 12:35 +0000
      Re: Linux at scale Bobbie Sellers <blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com> - 2024-08-04 08:42 -0700
        Re: Linux at scale vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-08-04 17:54 +0000
          Re: Linux at scale Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-04 22:30 +0000
            MS Access (was: Re: Linux at scale) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-08-05 02:34 +0000
              Re: MS Access (was: Re: Linux at scale) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-05 02:45 +0000
              Re: MS Access (was: Re: Linux at scale) Char Jackson <none@none.invalid> - 2024-08-04 22:39 -0500
                Re: MS Access (was: Re: Linux at scale) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-05 04:10 +0000
                Re: MS Access (was: Re: Linux at scale) "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-07 02:09 -0400
                Re: MS Access vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-08-07 01:56 +0000
              Re: MS Access (was: Re: Linux at scale) Philip Herlihy <PhillipHerlihy@SlashDevNull.invalid> - 2024-08-05 13:38 +0100
                Re: MS Access (was: Re: Linux at scale) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-06 00:25 +0000
                Re: MS Access "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2024-08-06 02:56 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-06 23:37 +0000
                Re: MS Access Philip Herlihy <PhillipHerlihy@SlashDevNull.invalid> - 2024-08-07 12:38 +0100
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-07 21:43 +0000
                Re: MS Access Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-08-08 07:50 +0000
                Re: MS Access Big Al <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-08-08 10:43 -0400
                Re: MS Access Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-08-08 19:42 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-09 01:16 +0000
                Re: MS Access rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-08-08 17:42 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-12 01:06 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-12 08:38 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-13 01:51 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-13 21:49 +0000
                Re: MS Access Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-08-14 02:48 +0000
                Re: MS Access Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-08-14 02:50 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-14 03:36 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-14 03:52 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-14 08:49 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-14 03:50 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-14 08:51 +0000
                Re: MS Access Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-08-14 16:52 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-14 21:37 +0000
                Re: MS Access sticks <wolverine01@charter.net> - 2024-08-14 18:22 -0500
                Re: MS Access Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-08-15 00:30 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-16 02:22 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-17 00:14 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-17 07:25 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2024-08-17 23:44 -0700
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-18 05:28 -0400
                Re: MS Access Andreas Eder <a_eder_muc@web.de> - 2024-08-18 11:49 +0200
                Re: MS Access rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-08-18 19:36 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-18 20:42 -0400
                Re: MS Access rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-08-19 20:44 +0000
                Re: MS Access p.dean@gmx.com (Peter Dean) - 2024-08-19 05:37 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-19 03:18 -0400
                Re: MS Access rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-08-19 20:51 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-21 23:55 +0000
                Re: MS Access Jack Strangio  <jackstrangio@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-18 08:43 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-18 13:55 -0400
                Re: MS Access vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-08-15 04:24 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-15 14:53 -0400
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-17 00:22 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-17 07:24 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lars Poulsen <lars@beagle-ears.com> - 2024-08-17 23:46 -0700
                Re: MS Access The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-18 10:14 +0100
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-19 23:55 -0400
                Re: MS Access rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-08-20 04:56 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-19 23:23 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-21 23:52 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-09 01:15 +0000
                Re: MS Access Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> - 2024-08-09 06:29 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-09 06:32 +0000
                Re: MS Access Philip Herlihy <PhillipHerlihy@SlashDevNull.invalid> - 2024-08-08 12:19 +0100
                Re: MS Access Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-08-08 13:21 +0100
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-09 01:15 +0000
                Re: MS Access Pancho <Pancho.Jones@proton.me> - 2024-08-09 08:51 +0100
              Re: MS Access Big Al <alan@invalid.com> - 2024-08-05 09:03 -0400
              Re: MS Access (was: Re: Linux at scale) Stan Brown <the_stan_brown@fastmail.fm> - 2024-08-05 12:05 -0700
                Re: MS Access "...winston" <winstonmvp@gmail.com> - 2024-08-05 19:32 -0400
              Re: MS Access not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-08-06 08:47 +1000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-06 00:26 +0000
                Re: MS Access vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2024-08-07 02:16 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-07 02:29 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-07 02:02 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-07 06:45 +0000
                Re: MS Access Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-08-07 22:30 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-07 22:44 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-07 21:44 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-08 03:11 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-12 00:28 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-12 08:38 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-12 14:16 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-13 02:10 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-13 12:53 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-13 21:43 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-13 01:33 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-13 21:44 +0000
                Re: MS Access jgd@cix.co.uk (John Dallman) - 2024-08-13 23:21 +0100
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-13 22:53 +0000
                Re: MS Access jgd@cix.co.uk (John Dallman) - 2024-08-14 09:19 +0100
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-14 08:47 +0000
                Re: MS Access The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-14 10:09 +0100
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-16 02:20 +0000
                Re: MS Access Nuno Silva <nunojsilva@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-16 09:11 +0100
                Re: MS Access The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2024-08-16 09:21 +0100
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-13 23:28 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-14 03:29 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-14 04:13 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-14 08:48 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-14 12:49 -0400
                Re: MS Access Charlie Gibbs <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> - 2024-08-14 16:55 +0000
                Re: MS Access candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-08-11 05:30 +0000
                Re: MS Access Jack Strangio  <jackstrangio@yahoo.com> - 2024-08-11 07:17 +0000
                Re: MS Access candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-08-22 21:00 +0000
                Re: MS Access Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2024-08-11 04:15 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-11 09:07 +0000
                Re: MS Access candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2024-08-23 22:00 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-11 09:06 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-07 21:39 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-08 03:12 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-12 00:23 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-12 08:39 +0000
                Re: MS Access Just Me <meeeeee@meeeee.com> - 2024-08-07 12:59 +0000
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-07 21:42 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-07 21:53 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-08 03:13 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-12 00:33 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-12 08:41 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-13 01:31 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-13 21:46 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-14 03:42 -0400
                Re: MS Access Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-08-14 08:49 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-17 23:30 -0400
                Re: MS Access rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2024-08-18 04:48 +0000
                Re: MS Access "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-18 01:17 -0400
  Re: Wonderful Windows Zaps Banks/Transport/Media after "Update" Yesterday "186282@ud0s4.net" <186283@ud0s4.net> - 2024-08-06 02:01 -0400

csiph-web