Re: KDE Goes Wayland

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!nntp.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: KDE Goes Wayland
Date	Mon, 8 Dec 2025 18:40:04 -0000 (UTC)
Organization	the-candyden-of-code
Lines	29
Message-ID	<slrn10je6cu.1sivk.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> (permalink)
References	<pan$1d816$ef458b6e$e50ff58b$47c70011@linux.rocks> <Y2adnbK3aa3lLK70nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10h4hto$3llc7$1@dont-email.me> <v8Cdndqttp203Kv0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Injection-Date	Mon, 08 Dec 2025 18:40:05 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="b3450a99fcd1d4c4cdb9a7665015b52e"; logging-data="359565"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/E0EtsU9TqLjqlQIrm7cqwWbXSkPO2mVIHdR6Etrs5rQ=="
User-Agent	slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:hVgc8oiS+3pg1hEy9WUBqta8FcU=
X-Face	b{dPmN&%4\|lEo,wUO\"KLEOu5N_br(N2Yuc5/qcR5i>9-!^e\.Tw9?/m0}/~:UOM:Zf]% b+ V4R8q\|QiU/R8\\|G\WpC`-s?=)\fbtNc&=/a3a)r7xbRI]Vl)r<%PTriJ3pGpl_/B6!8pe\btzx `~R! r3.0#lHRE+^Gro0[cjsban'vZ#j7,?I/tHk{s=TFJ:H?~=]`O*~3ZX`qik`b:.gVIc-[$t/e ZrQsWJ >\|l^I_[pbsIqwoz.WGA]<D
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:702405 comp.os.linux.misc:78508

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> wrote at 03:08 this Monday (GMT):
> On 12/7/25 13:44, kouya wrote:
>> c186282 wrote:
>>> Wayland, at this point it's clear it will
>>>   NEVER be ready for prime time. They've been
>>> at it forever and it's STILL all weird.
>> 
>> What is the general thought here about XLibre? The fork has made a lot of
>> progress and a ton of bugfixes that make X perfect in my daily experience.
>> XNamespaces, if anything ever uses them, makes the security principal
>> behind Wayland obscolete.
>
>    Still haven't tried it. Maybe someday.
>
>    X *works* and is very well documented.

Exactly, from what I've seen Wayland has some issues right now, and X11
works perfectly well.

>    Perhaps somebody, maybe with AI help, could
>    create an "X2" ... de-clunked, tighter ... but
>    still obeying all the old rules ?


The ai probably would make things worse

Maybe the XLibre fork could end up being the next X11?
-- 
user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-05 21:26 +0000
  Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-05 23:30 -0500
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 08:55 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-06 04:20 -0500
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:30 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-14 01:48 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-14 02:00 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 19:58 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-07 19:36 +0100
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:09 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2025-12-06 09:38 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:27 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 20:23 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-07 11:35 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:04 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-13 08:38 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-13 10:56 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-15 09:39 -0800
              Re: KDE Goes Wayland vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-15 18:12 +0000
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-06 15:44 +0000
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland kouya <kouyaheika@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-07 12:44 -0600
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-07 22:08 -0500
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-12-08 18:40 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-12-08 19:12 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-09 01:25 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-15 03:07 +0000
              Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-15 03:52 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-12-15 09:01 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-15 22:52 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-08 20:00 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-12-09 07:30 +1000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 09:59 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-12-09 11:24 +0000
              Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 14:17 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 08:15 -0800
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-15 03:08 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-15 04:03 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-15 10:22 -0800
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-15 22:53 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland "Joel W. Crump" <joelcrump@gmail.com> - 2025-12-15 16:09 -0500
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-09 19:47 +0000
              Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-09 20:40 -0500
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-12-10 10:58 -0600
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland bonkmaykr <bonkyboo@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-12 16:38 -0600
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-12-15 18:16 -0600
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-16 03:41 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-12-16 11:50 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-16 12:12 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-16 09:57 -0500
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-17 04:42 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-12-17 09:31 -0500
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-17 19:34 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-18 14:49 +0100
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-18 14:27 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-19 21:46 +0100

csiph-web