Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #78567
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: KDE Goes Wayland |
| Date | 2025-12-09 14:17 +0000 |
| Organization | A little, after lunch |
| Message-ID | <10h9b2f$s0tc$5@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <10h4hto$3llc7$1@dont-email.me> <v8Cdndqttp203Kv0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrn10je6cu.1sivk.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <10h8rud$nshd$3@dont-email.me> <187f885915bec455$43780$4031116$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 09/12/2025 11:24, Farley Flud wrote: > On Tue, 09 Dec 2025 09:59:41 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> >> That is standard for all new releases of anything. >> Even my own software goes through 'revisions...:-) >> > > But Wayland is not exactly a "new release." > > Wayland development has been going on for close to TWENTY YEARS 17 years at most > and it still is not suitable as a reliable and versatile graphics > subsystem. > That is your opinion. It is not a fact. Peole seenm to be uisng it without too many issues > Furthermore, Wayland is not a project done by amateurs in their > spare time. Wayland is supported by IBM/RedHat big bucks. > > Wake me up when I couldn't distinguish X11 from Wayland by any practical > measure. > If there were no detectable differences there wouldn't be any point in having Wayland at all would there? Seriously your logic needs a semester or two in philosophy to sort out. > -- There is nothing a fleet of dispatchable nuclear power plants cannot do that cannot be done worse and more expensively and with higher carbon emissions and more adverse environmental impact by adding intermittent renewable energy.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-05 21:26 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-05 23:30 -0500
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 08:55 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-06 04:20 -0500
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:30 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-14 01:48 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-14 02:00 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 19:58 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-07 19:36 +0100
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:09 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2025-12-06 09:38 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:27 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 20:23 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-07 11:35 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:04 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-13 08:38 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-13 10:56 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-06 15:44 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland kouya <kouyaheika@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-07 12:44 -0600
Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-07 22:08 -0500
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-12-08 18:40 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-12-08 19:12 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-09 01:25 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-08 20:00 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-12-09 07:30 +1000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 09:59 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-12-09 11:24 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 14:17 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 08:15 -0800
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-09 19:47 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-09 20:40 -0500
Re: KDE Goes Wayland chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-12-10 10:58 -0600
Re: KDE Goes Wayland bonkmaykr <bonkyboo@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-12 16:38 -0600
csiph-web