Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #78338
| Date | 2025-12-05 23:30 -0500 |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: KDE Goes Wayland |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc |
| References | <pan$1d816$ef458b6e$e50ff58b$47c70011@linux.rocks> |
| From | c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> |
| Organization | wokiesux |
| Message-ID | <Y2adnbK3aa3lLK70nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 12/5/25 16:26, Farley Flud wrote: > KDE Goes Wayland: > > https://blogs.kde.org/2025/11/26/going-all-in-on-a-wayland-future/ > > But what kind of a fucking idiot asshole would ever want to use > that bloated garbage known as "KDE?" Tend to agree :-) Like LXDE and, if not to be had, XFCE. > X11 will persist for a LONG, LONG, LONG time. X11 is technically "clunky", but it is also well REFINED and DOCUMENTED. If you don't do zippy video games then X11 is more than good enough for most anything. > Regarding screen capture, can that stupid Wayland utilize > Nvidia UVM to capture with only GPU? > > Answer: Fuck no! > > Wayland is garbage and so are all Wayland advocates. > > Wayland advocates will claim that xwayland can accommodate > any X11 application but this is pure BULLSHIT (just like > Wayland advocates). > > The SMART people, like me (IQ 280), will stick with X11. > > Wayland, and all of its advocates, can go to fucking hell. Wayland, at this point it's clear it will NEVER be ready for prime time. They've been at it forever and it's STILL all weird.
Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-05 21:26 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-05 23:30 -0500
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 08:55 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-06 04:20 -0500
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:30 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 19:58 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-07 19:36 +0100
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:09 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2025-12-06 09:38 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:27 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 20:23 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-07 11:35 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:04 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-06 15:44 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland kouya <kouyaheika@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-07 12:44 -0600
Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-07 22:08 -0500
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-12-08 18:40 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-12-08 19:12 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-09 01:25 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-08 20:00 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-12-09 07:30 +1000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 09:59 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-12-09 11:24 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 14:17 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 08:15 -0800
Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-09 19:47 +0000
Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-09 20:40 -0500
Re: KDE Goes Wayland chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-12-10 10:58 -0600
csiph-web