Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #78576

Re: KDE Goes Wayland

From John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc
Subject Re: KDE Goes Wayland
Date 2025-12-09 08:15 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <20251209081511.000019bd@gmail.com> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <v8Cdndqttp203Kv0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> <slrn10je6cu.1sivk.candycanearter07@candydeb.host.invalid> <10h8rud$nshd$3@dont-email.me> <187f885915bec455$43780$4031116$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <10h9b2f$s0tc$5@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, 9 Dec 2025 14:17:51 +0000
The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

> > Furthermore, Wayland is not a project done by amateurs in their
> > spare time.  Wayland is supported by IBM/RedHat big bucks.
> > 
> > Wake me up when I couldn't distinguish X11 from Wayland by any
> > practical measure.
> >   
> If there were no detectable differences there wouldn't be any point
> in having Wayland at all would there?
> 
> Seriously your logic needs  a semester or two in philosophy to sort
> out.

If a project is as open and direct about aiming to supplant and replace
another project as Wayland has been, expecting it to offer feature
parity with the thing it's replacing (and a relatively seamless switch
in terms of user experience) is entirely reasonable.

If this were Just Another FOSS Project, nobody would care that much
about missing features or wonky design choices - rather, them as did
care would ignore it, and the True Believers could continue on their
merry way. But Wayland specifically wants to be the Only Game In Town,
and Red Hat has been throwing its considerable weight behind that.
*That's* what gets people hacked off, here, and with good reason.

It's a rare day when FF of all people is the reasonable party in an
exchanged. Wonder if I should buy a lottery ticket.

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-05 21:26 +0000
  Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-05 23:30 -0500
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 08:55 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-06 04:20 -0500
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:30 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-14 01:48 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-14 02:00 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 19:58 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-07 19:36 +0100
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:09 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2025-12-06 09:38 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:27 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 20:23 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-07 11:35 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:04 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-12-13 08:38 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-13 10:56 +0000
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-06 15:44 +0000
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland kouya <kouyaheika@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-07 12:44 -0600
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-07 22:08 -0500
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-12-08 18:40 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-12-08 19:12 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-09 01:25 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-08 20:00 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-12-09 07:30 +1000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 09:59 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-12-09 11:24 +0000
              Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 14:17 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 08:15 -0800
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-09 19:47 +0000
              Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-09 20:40 -0500
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-12-10 10:58 -0600
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland bonkmaykr <bonkyboo@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-12 16:38 -0600

csiph-web