Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register

Groups > comp.os.linux.misc > #78455

Re: KDE Goes Wayland

Date 2025-12-07 22:08 -0500
Subject Re: KDE Goes Wayland
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc
References <pan$1d816$ef458b6e$e50ff58b$47c70011@linux.rocks> <Y2adnbK3aa3lLK70nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@giganews.com> <10h4hto$3llc7$1@dont-email.me>
From c186282 <c186282@nnada.net>
Organization wokiesux
Message-ID <v8Cdndqttp203Kv0nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 12/7/25 13:44, kouya wrote:
> c186282 wrote:
>> Wayland, at this point it's clear it will
>>   NEVER be ready for prime time. They've been
>> at it forever and it's STILL all weird.
> 
> What is the general thought here about XLibre? The fork has made a lot of
> progress and a ton of bugfixes that make X perfect in my daily experience.
> XNamespaces, if anything ever uses them, makes the security principal
> behind Wayland obscolete.

   Still haven't tried it. Maybe someday.

   X *works* and is very well documented.

   Perhaps somebody, maybe with AI help, could
   create an "X2" ... de-clunked, tighter ... but
   still obeying all the old rules ?

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-05 21:26 +0000
  Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-05 23:30 -0500
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 08:55 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-06 04:20 -0500
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:30 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 19:58 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-07 19:36 +0100
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:09 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> - 2025-12-06 09:38 +0000
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-06 11:27 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-06 20:23 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-07 11:35 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-07 19:04 +0000
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-06 15:44 +0000
    Re: KDE Goes Wayland kouya <kouyaheika@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-07 12:44 -0600
      Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-07 22:08 -0500
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-08 08:51 +0000
        Re: KDE Goes Wayland candycanearter07 <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> - 2025-12-08 18:40 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Mike Scott <usenet.16@scottsonline.org.uk.invalid> - 2025-12-08 19:12 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland rbowman <bowman@montana.com> - 2025-12-09 01:25 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-08 20:00 +0000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2025-12-09 07:30 +1000
          Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 09:59 +0000
            Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-12-09 11:24 +0000
              Re: KDE Goes Wayland The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 14:17 +0000
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-09 08:15 -0800
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-12-09 19:47 +0000
              Re: KDE Goes Wayland c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> - 2025-12-09 20:40 -0500
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2025-12-10 10:58 -0600
                Re: KDE Goes Wayland bonkmaykr <bonkyboo@canithesis.org> - 2025-12-12 16:38 -0600

csiph-web