Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ????????????

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	alt.free.newsservers, comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, news.software.readers, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject	Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ????????????
Date	Sat, 13 Apr 2013 11:43:01 -0700
Lines	24
Message-ID	<CD8EF545.1918A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	<Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{10.26.Seattle.2013}> <dheoadjzl3le$.d9qlonfza1i.dlg@40tude.net> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{18.29.Seattle.2013}> <CD8E04CD.19097%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{19.51.Seattle.2013}> <CD8E1CBD.190AC%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.12{22.22.Seattle.2013}> <CD8EDBB1.19149%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <kkc616$jhp$1@pcls6.std.com> <CD8EEBF3.19176%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <1b5a7267-e631-48b6-94c1-4c68d711ee9d@w3g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> <kkc7u5$4ta$1@reader1.panix.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net ZXBtu6RmymJDkcOMzz/GoQSIzlLG+a75XAxaPNkvvVmiqEpJo5
Cancel-Lock	sha1:Dj45TqxS7UG1LYruD6L0DW3zVrw=
User-Agent	Microsoft-Entourage/12.36.0.130206
Thread-Topic	Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ????????????
Thread-Index	Ac44drmDMnx9uX4iUE6X2YEgyrv2lA==
Xref	csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:173285

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

On 4/13/13 11:25 AM, in article kkc7u5$4ta$1@reader1.panix.com, "Gary
Burnore" <gburnore@panix.com> wrote:

> See. I can still smell a k00k a mile away.
> 
> <Bows>
> 
> Next?

Yes, the stalker who posted that has been following me around for 10 years
trolling me from group to group... except moderated groups where he either
is blocked or knows better than to even try.

He is one of the very few on Usenet I have decided is simply not worth my
time - not to mention he and his girlfriend tracked me down, contacted my
employer and family and neighbors, and otherwise just proved himself too
insane and dangerous even by the standards of the folks you see on Usenet.

-- 
"This doesn't mean our work is over; most GNU/Linux distros today contain
nonfree software, and there are more things that we expect a system to do."
-- Richard Stallman

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

"Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 10:26 -0700
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2013-04-12 21:17 -0400
    "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 18:29 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:37 -0700
        Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 19:51 -0700
          Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 20:19 -0700
            Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-12 22:22 -0700
              Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-12 23:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that posts only to draw attention to itself, and crossposts to five unrelated newsgroups should be SHIT CANNED WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE. Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 00:00 -0700
                Thank you ( Mark⋅S⋅Bilk, a Google Groups user ) for reading my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 08:30 -0700
                Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Mark S Bilk <mark@cosmicpenguin.com> - 2013-04-13 08:48 -0700
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 15:57 +0000
                Re: Thank you (Mark S Bilk, a Google Groups user) for reading my posts. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 10:46 -0600
              Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-13 17:52 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:03 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED.  Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 11:17 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:25 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:43 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? I Bought DataBasix <owner@databasix.com> - 2013-04-13 14:52 -0400
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 12:53 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:05 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:24 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:27 +0000
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 -0700
                Re: Anything that can NOT handle HTML emails/posts, should be SHIT CANNED. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:09 +0000
            Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:07 +0000
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? benj <benj@iwaynet.net> - 2013-04-13 14:27 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 16:01 +0000
                Lame, meaningless insults: "fucking coward", "kook" and "liar".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 09:28 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 09:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 17:36 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:07 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:23 -0700
                Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 13:19 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 13:42 -0700
                Re: Usenet is NOT "pure text". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:51 +0000
                Usenet is a form of email.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 10:43 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 10:45 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:33 -0500
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 16:39 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq·" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 19:45 -0400
                [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Hawkeye-X <teslerd@gmail.con> - 2013-04-13 19:56 -0600
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:41 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:43 -0400
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 02:47 +0000
                Re: [NOMINATION] Jeff Relf for the Technicolor Yawn Award. Re: Usenet is a form of email. ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 22:59 -0400
                Mr. "Hawkeye-X" has no idea if my posts specify colors or not.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:21 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:01 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 11:22 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 18:26 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 12:05 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 19:11 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 22:27 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 18:29 -0400
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:01 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Cujo DeSockpuppet <cujo@petitmorte.net> - 2013-04-13 22:55 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-13 23:02 +0000
                Re: Usenet is a form of email. ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:55 -0700
                What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:17 -0700
                Re: What is the name of Microsoft's latest email client for Office (OS⋅X) ?  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:32 -0700
                I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 17:53 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2013-04-13 17:55 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:09 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses. ?? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-13 19:30 -0700
                Re: I don't care what newsreader Mr. "Snit" uses.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:08 -0700
                Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 15:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 18:51 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn⋅near ALWAYS wrong, as is Mr. "Banana".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 15:54 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2013-04-14 03:44 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 20:57 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:48 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:17 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-04-14 17:26 +0100
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 09:37 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:47 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 10:44 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2013-04-14 21:34 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 14:45 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:57 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 14:47 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit" is damn-near ALWAYS right, as is Mr. "Banana". Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-14 09:33 -0700
                Re: Usenet is a form of email.  cipher <cipher@nospamforme.org> - 2013-04-15 00:13 +0000
                Mozilla Thunderbird isn't "dead".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-14 21:00 -0700
              Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:22 -0500
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 16:50 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 20:52 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2013-04-13 14:06 -0700
                I see at least 4 problems with the way ChrisV ranks nyms.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 20:08 -0700
                I'm tempted to auto⋅morph as I reply to every "chrisv" post.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:31 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-13 15:27 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-13 17:31 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".   ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 10:18 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 15:19 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".     ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-14 16:29 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-14 18:56 -0400
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:02 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".       ???????????? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2013-04-15 09:55 -0600
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-15 10:24 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:00 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:02 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:18 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:38 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-14 16:41 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", <A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 23:43 +0000
                Mr. "Snit", │A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium".  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 16:56 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", â‰≠A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ï»¿ï»¿ Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 17:08 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:30 +0000
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:06 -0700
                Re: Mr. "Snit", ????????A> tags are NOT "a detriment to a text based medium". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 01:11 +0000
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ???????????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-13 12:06 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies".  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-12 18:33 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? "   Sir Gregory Hall, Esq$B!&\(B" <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-13 10:04 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-12 21:37 -0400
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-13 15:28 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?? imp@ster.invalid ( Ï M Poster) - 2013-04-13 21:47 +0100
  Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? unruh <unruh@invalid.ca> - 2013-04-13 23:36 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 16:46 -0700
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:32 +0000
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Gary Burnore <gburnore@panix.com> - 2013-04-14 00:31 +0000
    Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-13 18:14 -0700
      Re: Dr. Unruh, "eternal-september" noobs can't see my posts.  Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-13 18:21 -0700
    Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-15 07:25 -0500
      Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Checkmate <LunaticFringe@The.Edge> - 2013-04-15 09:37 -0700
        Re: "Eternal-September" should be called "Eternal-Newbies". ?????? Rhonda Lea Kirk Fries <rhondaleakirk@earthling.net> - 2013-04-15 14:07 -0400
      Publically plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2013-04-15 11:55 -0700
        Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.     Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· <greghall@home.fåke> - 2013-04-15 15:09 -0400
          Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move.  "51%" <51%@yay.net.ru> - 2013-04-16 19:36 +1000
            Re: Re: Publically(sic) plonking everyone who replies to me is a ridiculous noob move. ?? none of your buisiness <none@none.com> - 2013-04-16 12:15 -0400

csiph-web