Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Netnews: The Origin Story |
| Date | Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:17:35 -0300 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 63 |
| Message-ID | <87a5ech2f4.fsf@jemoni.to> (permalink) |
| References | <vgdo2q$1l4qm$1@dont-email.me> <87a5edtsrr.fsf@jemoni.to> <1r2lmw5.52vtyww92xsaN%snipeco.2@gmail.com> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 06 Nov 2024 15:17:36 +0100 (CET) |
| Injection-Info | dont-email.me; posting-host="86c3b33a1e78f159a7a4b47649e2da43"; logging-data="2258273"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18yuwPxPfda4uSj7f6yrGlOkFilHM06u5w=" |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:QooxCqABnt1TcKuUIWGpAEY58Ro= sha1:D8ANRXiRo1YAwo5oOZUmpCy0wxM= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.misc:26006 |
Show key headers only | View raw
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) writes: > Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> wrote: > >> Rich <rich@example.invalid> writes: >> >> > Yes, it is in the form of a pdf, but be that as it may, it makes for an >> > interesting view into the start of Usenet: >> > >> > <https://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb/papers/netnews-hist.pdf> >> > >> >> Thank you for posting! >> > > Writing as someone addicted to Usenet for 30 years it's good to see the > whole story, much of which was new to me; I've saved it, thanks again. > > # Usenet was my first love > # And it will be my last... Lol---amazing. For some reason, I am deeply involved with it too, though by the time I got involved with it (early 2000s) it was perhaps at the end of its heyday. Nevertheless, I continue to believe in it. Not in its ``success'', ``popularity'' or whatever. I believe in the idea. (*) The paper I just finished reading the paper. Almost everything in it was new to me, so I'd like to thank the author very much for having written it. (When I realized it was a 2024-paper, I was amazed! At first I thought it was a pretty old paper.) I was struck by the conclusions regarding abuse and governance. Perhaps it is not hard to notice that these are the problems and that they were never solved. I have been thinking a bit about these things for many years. I think I've tried to solve these problems myself. Not very seriously, but in my mind. I never did. And recently I think I convinced myself that I should not even try anymore. This giving up seems to have been fruitful because I actually believe that we should have smaller groups, smaller networks. It seems that it's the small ones that actually do very well. In other words, I came to the conclusion that anonimity is not that important and having a boss dictating the local rules isn't so bad when anyone can duplicate the whole software-server-thing and start your own. I was also struck by the author's apparent opinion that they should've used cryptography if it were easier and more available back then. In other words, it does seem that Steven Bellovin would care for authenticity and not necessarily confidentiality (after all these discussions are mostly public). Now that Google Groups has left and that sysadmins have been keeping spam out (THANK YOU SO MUCH, sysadmins of the USENET!), I think the USENET is pretty good again. The volume is low, so it's been great fun to be here again sharing ideas and learning with the rest of the world once again without the ads and all the unnecessary whistles and bells of the web. (Though I miss more people with expertise knowledge in all areas, so I do wish that the volume grows a bit and I believe it will because the network seems to be in order once again. Thanks to everyone who has contributed to this.)
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-05 18:27 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-05 15:55 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 11:42 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 11:17 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:54 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 16:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 21:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 11:04 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:12 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 16:19 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 18:28 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:04 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 19:41 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:14 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 22:59 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:23 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:18 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:40 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 22:02 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 22:51 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:07 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-07 13:14 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:15 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-06 20:26 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:42 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:39 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> - 2024-11-06 23:16 -0300
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 16:52 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 17:17 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-06 18:56 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-07 06:20 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-06 21:37 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-06 22:45 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2024-11-07 10:10 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-11-07 00:34 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:06 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-11-08 06:32 +1000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 21:03 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 23:03 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-07 23:00 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-08 16:16 +0100
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2024-11-08 15:48 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2024-11-08 01:29 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-11-07 03:20 +0000
Re: Netnews: The Origin Story D <nospam@example.net> - 2024-11-07 10:04 +0100
csiph-web