Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #65311
| References | (9 earlier) <mailman.6313.1391383680.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-C454F0.18405902022014@news.panix.com> <CAPTjJmo6qpfP74YF+2xKV1y-qUNt6rG+8kHkoYJZXbb3HED5pg@mail.gmail.com> <CABicbJJrUv=Nrag5DQGU49BO98zpymvyZCtfxA=TYLrd14Tqvg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmodq2s-5zy=jxrZ9NNkghsbEDcf6aOAkrYTypeNJPKmHQ@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2014-02-02 17:54 -0800 |
| Subject | Re: __init__ is the initialiser |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6320.1391392514.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Devin Jeanpierre >> Destroying memory is comparatively easy, as you say -- just make the >> object's internal state "invalid", rather than adding anything to the >> language. > > Yeah. Works fine if you have a cooperative system that checks that > state every time; otherwise, it'd need at least some language support > (the goal is to have its destructor called and all its references > wiped, so resources get released). I guess my point is that I don't see what you need on top of extension modules. Same for previous paragraph. -- Devin
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-31 22:16 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-01 05:23 +0000
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-01 00:25 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-03 12:15 +1300
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:27 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-02 18:40 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 11:07 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 17:24 -0800
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 12:37 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 17:54 -0800
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-02-03 08:44 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 13:50 +0000
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:44 -0700
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 04:57 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 19:57 +0000
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-02-03 19:38 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-02 19:35 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-02 19:45 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-02 22:14 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-02-02 21:15 -0600
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-03 00:06 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-03 00:12 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 16:49 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-02 21:34 -0800
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-01-31 21:31 -0800
csiph-web