Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #65322

Re: __init__ is the initialiser

Date 2014-02-02 21:34 -0800
From Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us>
Subject Re: __init__ is the initialiser
References (11 earlier) <roy-873183.19454802022014@news.panix.com> <lcn1c0$k2g$2@ger.gmane.org> <CANc-5Uw0HpTSsy56zzh-FGuLK7eS2KiLW_bYwfFU2iPPFp9zBA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.6325.1391403799.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-3D8A1A.00124503022014@news.panix.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.6327.1391406990.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 02/02/2014 09:12 PM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <mailman.6325.1391403799.18130.python-list@python.org>,
>   Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> wrote:
>
>>   Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> Wrote in message:
>>> On Sun, Feb 2, 2014 at 9:14 PM, Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> wrote:
>>>> And when the q-bits get entangled up,  we won't know the question
>>>> till after the answer has collapsed.
>>>
>>> Won't looking at the answer change it?
>>>
>>
>> No, looking at it is what collapses it. Before that it was just
>>   another Schroedinger's cat
>
> So, what you're saying is when I delete an object, __del__() has both
> been called and not been called?

That would certainly explain the problems with __del__!

--
~Ethan~

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: __init__ is the initialiser Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-31 22:16 -0500
  Re: __init__ is the initialiser Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-01 05:23 +0000
    Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-01 00:25 -0500
      Re: __init__ is the initialiser Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-03 12:15 +1300
        Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:27 +1100
          Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-02 18:40 -0500
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 11:07 +1100
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 17:24 -0800
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 12:37 +1100
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 17:54 -0800
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-02-03 08:44 -0500
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 13:50 +0000
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:44 -0700
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 04:57 +1100
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 19:57 +0000
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-02-03 19:38 -0500
        Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-02 19:35 -0500
          Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-02 19:45 -0500
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-02 22:14 -0500
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-02-02 21:15 -0600
            Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-03 00:06 -0500
              Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-03 00:12 -0500
                Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 16:49 +1100
                Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-02 21:34 -0800
    Re: __init__ is the initialiser Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-01-31 21:31 -0800

csiph-web