Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #65316
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: __init__ is the initialiser |
| Date | 2014-02-02 22:14 -0500 |
| Organization | news.gmane.org |
| References | (7 earlier) <roy-5740C1.00250401022014@news.panix.com> <bl81skFh14iU1@mid.individual.net> <CAPTjJmo4yS7CD2X2Cpi+ftx1fie4dSwUt_szgCO-BNpwK4kKOA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.6316.1391387539.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-873183.19454802022014@news.panix.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.6322.1391397084.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> Wrote in message: > In article <mailman.6316.1391387539.18130.python-list@python.org>, > Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> wrote: > >> Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> Wrote in message: >> > >> > >> > [1] Scrub the RAM clean and return it to the computer, put the 1 bits >> > onto the stack for subsequent reuse, and throw all the useless 0 bits >> > out onto the heap. >> > >> >> But don't you realize, we have to keep the zero bits around, so >> the one bits have someone to feel superior to. > > Just wait until the two bits start showing up. Then let's how the one > bits feel, huh? > And when the q-bits get entangled up, we won't know the question till after the answer has collapsed. -- DaveA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-01-31 22:16 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-02-01 05:23 +0000
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-01 00:25 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-02-03 12:15 +1300
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:27 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-02 18:40 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 11:07 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 17:24 -0800
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 12:37 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Devin Jeanpierre <jeanpierreda@gmail.com> - 2014-02-02 17:54 -0800
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-02-03 08:44 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 13:50 +0000
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 10:44 -0700
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-04 04:57 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Nicholas Cole <nicholas.cole@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 19:57 +0000
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-02-03 19:38 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-02 19:35 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-02 19:45 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-02 22:14 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-02-02 21:15 -0600
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-02-03 00:06 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-02-03 00:12 -0500
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-02-03 16:49 +1100
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-02-02 21:34 -0800
Re: __init__ is the initialiser Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-01-31 21:31 -0800
csiph-web