Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #30130

Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!goblin1!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.018
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.96; '*S*': 0.00; '__name__': 0.07; 'other,': 0.09; 'sep': 0.09; 'def': 0.10; ':-)': 0.13; 'benjamin': 0.16; 'closures': 0.16; 'frame,': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'received:mail- wi0-f178.google.com': 0.16; 'statement.': 0.16; 'subject:usage': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'appropriate': 0.20; 'defined': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'received:209.85.212': 0.28; 'subject:per': 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; 'function': 0.30; 'not.': 0.32; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'pm,': 0.35; 'received:209.85': 0.35; 'created': 0.36; 'except': 0.36; 'does': 0.37; 'being': 0.37; 'received:209': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'nothing': 0.38; 'sure': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'called': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'chance': 0.61; 'between': 0.63; 'alive.': 0.65; 'fact,': 0.69; 'oscar': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Y2dOYGPKmDAzdtGPDUrCUEm8Ym+xkYCZT9ZL7kQ7W34=; b=FDVdpzj+cSLyU1K8yCMeyBqktUhOz5ORRtTzRnK9T36V2EzvHX+aUAUF/K9rjVRxQc T57vrEH1V4uuAdFGJM8nTeLVaCR4F8tbkIBgtFd8BoOCN7EhQEztyAUNHot83v+amLM0 JX3f876jr4If8unEy56jw1HLtjjBZwi9WMSdrYaZb6/it2h/4To9+TYbwcK2lABbn9z+ TjKxMnoOReLqZkj/BTnUeWOv5nfNsU4MM2qz851yKRtP4ICj0/WY7OtX0+se5YrsKz9P iEdWYo0v+hDOjWx5+nClcPk0dVdF28GhaLR45KaNDJLjRGEu5eYq1fMDHxWUQQCE+Js+ E/1Q==
MIME-Version 1.0
In-Reply-To <CAHVvXxQfAMiPaHp0SDtfLknmK2nQUqaZBc83_LuE9nTHcHyerg@mail.gmail.com>
References <983c532f-3ff6-4bd2-bb48-07cf4d065a4b@googlegroups.com> <5060EB2C.6080508@tim.thechases.com> <5060F3BB.7010706@gmail.com> <CAHVvXxTOZzjv__r-TgOUdJNnYBuAUUc-yKRPvQF82XQocNr9pQ@mail.gmail.com> <5061F31D.3020207@gmail.com> <CAHVvXxQfAMiPaHp0SDtfLknmK2nQUqaZBc83_LuE9nTHcHyerg@mail.gmail.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:09:24 -0600
Subject Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy
To Python <python-list@python.org>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1381.1348611003.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 13
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1348611003 news.xs4all.nl 6987 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:50336
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:30130

Show key headers only | View raw

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Oscar Benjamin
<oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also I think lambda functions might be able to keep the frame alive. Are
> they by any chance being created in a function that is called in a loop?

I'm pretty sure they don't.  Closures don't keep a reference to the
calling frame, only to the appropriate cellvars.

Also note that whether a function is a closure has nothing to do with
whether it was defined by a lambda or a def statement.  In fact,
there's no difference between functions created by one vs. the other,
except that one has an interesting __name__ and the other does not.
:-)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy MrsEntity <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 14:59 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-24 18:22 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 16:58 -0700
    Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
    Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-24 21:14 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 21:21 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-25 00:41 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 05:51 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 07:06 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:10 +0100
  Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 06:40 -0500
    Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 05:44 -0700
      Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 13:53 +0100
  Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:54 +0100
    Re: gracious responses Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-25 15:17 +0000
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 14:50 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:02 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:35 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 17:10 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 16:09 -0600
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 18:35 -0500

csiph-web