Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #30070

Re: gracious responses

From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: gracious responses
Date 2012-09-25 12:54 +0100
References <983c532f-3ff6-4bd2-bb48-07cf4d065a4b@googlegroups.com> <mcd2681b5rfgofvctd24durtavpg7c1moe@invalid.netcom.com> <50618C96.4000709@tim.thechases.com> <k3s3dg$511$1@ger.gmane.org> <5061981E.2090500@tim.thechases.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1326.1348573932.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 25/09/2012 12:40, Tim Chase wrote:
> On 09/25/12 06:10, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 25/09/2012 11:51, Tim Chase wrote:
>>> If only other unnamed persons on the list were so gracious rather
>>> than turning the flame-dial to 11.
>>>
>>
>> Oh heck what have I said this time?
>
> You'd *like* to take credit?  ;-)
>
> Nah, not you or any of the regulars here.  The comment was regarding
> the flame-fest that's been running in some parallel threads over the
> last ~12hr or so.  Mostly instigated by one person with a
> particularly quick trigger, vitriolic tongue, and a disregard for
> pythonic code.
>
> -tkc
>
>

Well thank goodness for that.  Of course the person to whom you've 
alluded has been defended over on the tutor mailing list, seriously, and 
as I've said elsewhere after referring to my family as pigs!!!

-- 
Cheers.

Mark Lawrence.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy MrsEntity <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 14:59 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-24 18:22 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 16:58 -0700
    Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
    Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-24 21:14 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 21:21 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-25 00:41 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 05:51 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 07:06 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:10 +0100
  Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 06:40 -0500
    Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 05:44 -0700
      Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 13:53 +0100
  Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:54 +0100
    Re: gracious responses Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-25 15:17 +0000
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 14:50 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:02 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:35 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 17:10 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 16:09 -0600
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 18:35 -0500

csiph-web