Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #30127
| Date | 2012-09-25 14:02 -0700 |
|---|---|
| From | Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy |
| References | (1 earlier) <5061056F.6080702@davea.name> <50613131.6030102@gmail.com> <50619035.3080106@davea.name> <5061EC34.5050009@gmail.com> <5061FCFB.3030900@davea.name> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1377.1348606988.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 9/25/2012 11:50 AM, Dave Angel wrote: > I suspect that heapy has some limitation in its reporting, and that's > what the discrepancy. That would be my first suspicion as well - except that heapy's results agree so well with what I expect, and I can't think of any reason I'd be using 10x more memory. If heapy is wrong, then I need to try and figure out what's using up all that memory some other way... but I don't know what that way might be. > ... can be an expensive proposition if you are building millions of > them. So can nested functions with non-local variable references, in > case you have any of those. Not as far as I know. Cheers, MrsEntity
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy MrsEntity <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 14:59 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-24 18:22 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 16:58 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-24 21:14 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 21:21 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-25 00:41 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 05:51 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 07:06 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:10 +0100
Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 06:40 -0500
Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 05:44 -0700
Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 13:53 +0100
Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:54 +0100
Re: gracious responses Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-25 15:17 +0000
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:02 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:35 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 17:10 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 16:09 -0600
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 18:35 -0500
csiph-web