Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #30059
| Date | 2012-09-25 05:51 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> |
| Subject | Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy |
| References | <983c532f-3ff6-4bd2-bb48-07cf4d065a4b@googlegroups.com> <mcd2681b5rfgofvctd24durtavpg7c1moe@invalid.netcom.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1311.1348570196.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 09/24/12 23:41, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 14:59:47 -0700 (PDT), MrsEntity > <junkshops@gmail.com> declaimed the following in > gmane.comp.python.general: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'm working on some code that parses a 500kb, 2M line file line by line and saves, per line, some derived strings > > Pardon? A 2million line file will contain, at the minimum 2million > line-end characters. That four times 500kB just in the line-ends, > ignoring any data. As corrected later in the thread, MrsEntity writes """ I have, in fact, this very afternoon, invented a means of writing a carriage return character using only 2 bits of information. I am prepared to sell licenses to this revolutionary technology for the low price of $29.95 plus tax. Sorry, that should've been a 500Mb, 2M line file. """ If only other unnamed persons on the list were so gracious rather than turning the flame-dial to 11. I hope that when people come to the list, *this* is what they see, laugh, and want to participate. Although, MrsEntity could be zombie David A. Huffman, whose encoding scheme actually *can* store 2M lines in 500kb :-) -tkc
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy MrsEntity <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 14:59 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-24 18:22 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 16:58 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-24 21:14 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 21:21 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-25 00:41 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 05:51 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 07:06 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:10 +0100
Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 06:40 -0500
Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 05:44 -0700
Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 13:53 +0100
Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:54 +0100
Re: gracious responses Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-25 15:17 +0000
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 14:50 -0400
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:02 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:35 -0700
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 17:10 -0500
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 16:09 -0600
Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 18:35 -0500
csiph-web