Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #30130

Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy

References (1 earlier) <5060EB2C.6080508@tim.thechases.com> <5060F3BB.7010706@gmail.com> <CAHVvXxTOZzjv__r-TgOUdJNnYBuAUUc-yKRPvQF82XQocNr9pQ@mail.gmail.com> <5061F31D.3020207@gmail.com> <CAHVvXxQfAMiPaHp0SDtfLknmK2nQUqaZBc83_LuE9nTHcHyerg@mail.gmail.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date 2012-09-25 16:09 -0600
Subject Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.1381.1348611003.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Oscar Benjamin
<oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> wrote:
> Also I think lambda functions might be able to keep the frame alive. Are
> they by any chance being created in a function that is called in a loop?

I'm pretty sure they don't.  Closures don't keep a reference to the
calling frame, only to the appropriate cellvars.

Also note that whether a function is a closure has nothing to do with
whether it was defined by a lambda or a def statement.  In fact,
there's no difference between functions created by one vs. the other,
except that one has an interesting __name__ and the other does not.
:-)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy MrsEntity <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 14:59 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-24 18:22 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 16:58 -0700
    Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
    Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy bryanjugglercryptographer@yahoo.com - 2012-09-27 01:00 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-24 21:14 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-24 21:21 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-09-25 00:41 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 05:51 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 07:06 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:10 +0100
  Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 06:40 -0500
    Re: gracious responses (was: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy) alex23 <wuwei23@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 05:44 -0700
      Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 13:53 +0100
  Re: gracious responses Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-25 12:54 +0100
    Re: gracious responses Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-25 15:17 +0000
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Dave Angel <d@davea.name> - 2012-09-25 14:50 -0400
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:02 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Junkshops <junkshops@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 14:35 -0700
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 17:10 -0500
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2012-09-25 16:09 -0600
  Re: Memory usage per top 10x usage per heapy Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2012-09-25 18:35 -0500

csiph-web