Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #23893
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Indentation styles |
| Date | 2013-05-07 17:56 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kmb7vl$d68$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <rationale-20130507160938@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
On 07/05/2013 16:23, Stefan Ram allegedly wrote:
> markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> writes:
>> I don't see why code can't be formatted for its intended audience either.
>
> The formatting too is part of the message I want to convey,
> so to me it would not be the same message anymore.
<snippalot />
All fair and well, but one aspect that you have not covered and that to
me is of import, is the comment-out-ability. That is, because I care
about being able easily to comment-out/decomment stuff, I usually don't
mix parts of the block descriptor (flow-control, method descriptor,
etc.) and statements.
To exemplify, if I wrote...
void foo()
{ bar();
boom();
bang();
}
... and subsequently decided that I didn't want to bar() after all, I'd
have to alter the structure. So I'll either write:
void foo()
{
bar();
boom();
bang();
}
or
void foo() {
bar();
boom();
bang();
}
While I understand, rationally, the arguments for the former, for some
eerie reason it hasn't really caught on to me, and I've mainly stuck to
the latter. But YMMV.
--
DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 17:56 +0200
Re: Indentation styles lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-07 17:39 +0100
Re: Indentation styles Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-05-07 13:35 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-05-07 21:29 +0000
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-08 17:56 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-12 22:07 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-13 11:02 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 17:34 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 17:44 -0700
Re: Indentation styles lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-14 09:26 +0100
Re: Indentation styles Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 10:23 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-17 19:43 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-17 19:42 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-13 20:53 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-14 13:07 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-15 18:47 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-16 05:28 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-17 19:44 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2013-05-26 20:35 +0300
Re: Indentation styles Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-05-08 00:00 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 23:57 +0200
csiph-web