Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #23903
| From | Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Indentation styles |
| Date | 2013-05-07 13:35 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mn.3b2f7dd517c15b2f.70216@a.com> (permalink) |
| References | <rationale-20130507160938@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <kmb7vl$d68$1@dont-email.me> <edit-20130507180607@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <xI2dnZbBJ5yosxTMnZ2dnUVZ8sudnZ2d@bt.com> |
lipska the kat wrote :
> On 07/05/13 17:11, Stefan Ram wrote:
>> Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> writes:
>>> ... and subsequently decided that I didn't want to bar() after all,
>>
> <snippage>
>
>> ... What I do /not/ like that much is:
>>
>> void alpha() {
>> beta();
>> gamma(); ...
>>
>
> Ah, my favorite style, I can't see why anyone would want or
> need anything else. I've been known to reformat code with a particularly
> irritating bracketing style but life is too short so generally now I try to
> live with it. But really ...
>
> void alpha() {
> beta();
> gamma();
> }
>
> Is a thing of beauty and a joy to behold, it's all you need :-)
Hmmm, I prefer my braces on their own line. In your style I am forever
chasing my eye around the screen trying to find out if there is a
brace, whereas a brace on a separate line stands out. YMMV but IMHO it
is a faster way to read code.
--
Wojtek :-)
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 17:56 +0200
Re: Indentation styles lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-07 17:39 +0100
Re: Indentation styles Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-05-07 13:35 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-05-07 21:29 +0000
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-08 17:56 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-12 22:07 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-13 11:02 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 17:34 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 17:44 -0700
Re: Indentation styles lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-14 09:26 +0100
Re: Indentation styles Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 10:23 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-17 19:43 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-17 19:42 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-13 20:53 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-14 13:07 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-15 18:47 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-16 05:28 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-17 19:44 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2013-05-26 20:35 +0300
Re: Indentation styles Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-05-08 00:00 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 23:57 +0200
csiph-web