Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #23894
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: lectures about "programming methodology" |
| Date | 2013-05-07 18:07 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kmb8l1$hf5$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <classroom-20130505192642@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
On 05/05/2013 20:37, Stefan Ram allegedly wrote: > I decided to watch lecture videos from the Stanford > University about »programming methodology«, which actually > teach Java. > > I was somewhat surprised that the lectures of the renowned > Stanford university do not have such a high overall > quality at all. > <snip /> Stefan, allow me to join the crowd in defence of the quack you have unearthed. After all, we all know that ambiguity doesn't matter in programming, because the compiler can guess our intent and make things just right. And getting people interested is all that matters. I mean, we've all had this colleague, the enthusiastic slob, and we've all loved to maintain his code. And finally, it is only natural that if, after having paid for the transmission of knowledge, students want to know how it /really/ works, they should take the initiative and turn to freely available resources on the 'net. Perfectly normal. Nothing to see here, carry on. -- DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: lectures about "programming methodology" Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 18:07 +0200
csiph-web