Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24049
| From | Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Indentation styles |
| Date | 2013-05-13 17:34 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <130520131734086579%jimsgibson@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <kmbrnv$5ge$1@dont-email.me> <4_yit.73$A26.64@newsfe10.iad> <51904aed$0$32109$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <fka2p8d0rt1uvc5to0eb3l7ekh12cgugbl@4ax.com> <51917188$0$32104$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
In article <51917188$0$32104$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote: > On 5/13/2013 2:02 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > > On Sun, 12 May 2013 22:07:42 -0400, Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> > > wrote: > > > > [snip] > > > >> Each language has its own standards, conventions and practices. I am > >> very skeptical about an attempt to format different languages identical. > > > > Not identical, but I have found that I can use very similar > > standards across multiple languages. > > I am sure that you *can*. > > But you will end up with N-1 or N languages being > formatted "unusual". To my limited knowledge Java is the only language whose originating vendor publishes an "official" formatting standard. Usually, it is individuals, groups, or organizations that develop formatting standards and attempt to enforce them for some body of work. Authors will use a consistent formatting style, and these can become defacto standards (e.g., Kernighan and Ritchie, Stroustrup). I, too, try to be consistent in formatting style when moving between languages whenever possible, because it makes me more productive. I have worked on projects with practically no standards, and others with extensive standards, but they never seemed to be enforced. Usually, the customer just wants the project finished, and never mind about the format of the code. -- Jim Gibson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 17:56 +0200
Re: Indentation styles lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-07 17:39 +0100
Re: Indentation styles Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-05-07 13:35 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-05-07 21:29 +0000
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-08 17:56 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-12 22:07 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-13 11:02 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 17:34 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 17:44 -0700
Re: Indentation styles lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-14 09:26 +0100
Re: Indentation styles Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 10:23 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-17 19:43 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-17 19:42 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-13 20:53 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-14 13:07 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-15 18:47 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-16 05:28 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-17 19:44 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2013-05-26 20:35 +0300
Re: Indentation styles Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-05-08 00:00 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 23:57 +0200
csiph-web