Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #24079
| From | Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Indentation styles |
| References | (8 earlier) <fka2p8d0rt1uvc5to0eb3l7ekh12cgugbl@4ax.com> <51917188$0$32104$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <130520131734086579%jimsgibson@gmail.com> <standard-20130514031443@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <kmt5m4$6gc$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <vnTkt.5894$EO2.473@newsfe02.iad> (permalink) |
| Organization | Public Usenet Newsgroup Access |
| Date | 2013-05-15 18:47 -0300 |
On 05/14/2013 08:07 AM, Daniele Futtorovic wrote: > On 14/05/2013 03:16, Stefan Ram allegedly wrote: >> Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> writes: >>> To my limited knowledge Java is the only language whose originating >>> vendor publishes an "official" formatting standard. >> >> »By convention, method names should be a verb in >> lowercase or a multi-word name that begins with a verb >> in lowercase, followed by adjectives, nouns, etc.« >> >> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/java/javaOO/methods.html >> >> The followers thus should write: >> >> calculateSquareroot( calculateSquare( x )+ calculateSquare( y )) >> >> . Now, Rob Pike has the correct guidelines for us: >> >> »Procedure names should reflect what they do; >> function names should reflect what they return.« >> >> http://www.lysator.liu.se/c/pikestyle.html >> >> , thus: >> >> print( square( 2 )) > > square( x ) creates a two-dimensional square with x pixel side length, > right? In the context of a graphing package I might expect that. In the context of a math package I would not. AHS
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 17:56 +0200
Re: Indentation styles lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-07 17:39 +0100
Re: Indentation styles Wojtek <nowhere@a.com> - 2013-05-07 13:35 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2013-05-07 21:29 +0000
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-08 17:56 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-12 22:07 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-13 11:02 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-13 19:04 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 17:34 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 17:44 -0700
Re: Indentation styles lipska the kat <"nospam at neversurrender dot co dot uk"> - 2013-05-14 09:26 +0100
Re: Indentation styles Jim Gibson <jimsgibson@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 10:23 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-17 19:43 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-17 19:42 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-05-13 20:53 -0400
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-14 13:07 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-15 18:47 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-16 05:28 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-05-17 19:44 -0300
Re: Indentation styles Stanimir Stamenkov <s7an10@netscape.net> - 2013-05-26 20:35 +0300
Re: Indentation styles Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2013-05-08 00:00 +0200
Re: Indentation styles Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2013-05-08 11:12 -0700
Re: Indentation styles Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-05-07 23:57 +0200
csiph-web