Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22132

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it.

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.usenet.kooks

Show all headers | View raw

On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
> Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>>
>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>>
>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>>
>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>>
>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>>
>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>
>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>>
>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>>
>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>
> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.

His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.

> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
> "ko0k".
> The provenance of which escapes me.

That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have 
the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive, 
atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way 
of expressing things.

Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes 
with a question:

>>>>> Sooo... the message?

Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
+ Just so you know?

Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.

SSN, same post in this thread:

>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.

TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:

+ At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
+ discover his Net activity.

Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post 
rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd 
frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not 
to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.

Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad>

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
+ --
+
+ fup set auk

Compare that TOSEM post already linked:

+ --
+ r/a/tv added

Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.

More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$iti$1@dont-email.me>:

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300

A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and 
gathering the links and evidence.

If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized 
Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.

But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.

>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>>
>> Good catch, kensi.
>
> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
> material, faulty as it is?

It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.

> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
> screen real estate.

Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost 
groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you 
seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this 
morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The 
question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring 
to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction 
all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the 
baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a 
random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly 
asserting, is the real giveaway.

Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be 
overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single 
post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for 
one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other 
kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter 
than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick 
with it, ko0ky.

And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being 
outed yet again. Here's some space for you:

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:

a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed

b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
    just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
    allowed to post to usenet without paying.

c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"A clue, a clue. My kingdom for a clue!!!!"                ~Gweggles,
in an uncommon moment of self-awareness.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Saucer Sized Nipples <garnier@fructis.netnetnet> - 2013-02-03 23:34 +0000
  Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 02:03 -0800
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Royoporus badius <Forest@ElginSt.Pembroke> - 2013-02-04 11:27 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Steve <me@privacy.net> - 2013-02-04 11:31 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-04 19:40 -0500
      Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 02:24 -0800
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-05 13:42 +0100
          Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:08 -0500
            Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-06 11:34 +0100
              Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-06 21:04 -0500
                [OT] Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-07 06:03 +0000
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-07 13:12 +0100
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 04:17 -0800
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:41 -0500

csiph-web