Path: csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: kensi Newsgroups: alt.usenet.kooks,news.software.readers,alt.free.newsservers,rec.arts.tv,comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Followup-To: alt.usenet.kooks Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2013 17:08:16 -0500 Organization: albasani.net Lines: 158 Message-ID: References: <6ahdhh.ukl.19.1@news.alt.net> <09e82da5-f9b9-4374-8ab7-45cf3a213522@9g2000yqy.googlegroups.com> <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad> <64ad1c79-1cda-434c-b859-51a0b02213e3@5g2000yqz.googlegroups.com> <7b031846-d06b-4359-96a2-f2d98378666d@cd3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: news.albasani.net CizzESIpEs4bIJt3y1xFpTISaxWJGuUe6AalKMwOFNbH4dpnqpM33EXZahwHJzwLQr0/y58COMv6NGHY9l3e/g== NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 22:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: news.albasani.net; logging-data="ltFfD2TcTeondOSVkLSPUidA9JhjhiqbqKEy7OM1H3jiEr/fH9Og53Gk7BV0Nr+auu333akD1vfsFsHMFKX+5+jzH5h5C5G3EZAe/MuCEnctUerWvmML2TYGdemphUuY"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" User-Agent: NewsTap/3.5.5 (iPad) In-Reply-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:6x5vzJ7qdS6ZvI3tOfgPQucfvsA= Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:22132 On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote: > Andrew Wilson wrote: >> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi wrote: >>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote: >>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples >>>> wrote: >>>>> Goblin wrote: >>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote: >>>>>>> Not to mention "playing". >>> >>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"...... >>> >>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend. >>> >>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list >>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not. >>> >>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning" >>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays >>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned". >>> >>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote >>> >>> Message-ID: >>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500 >>> >>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill" >>> >>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles. > > Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation. His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however. > In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post > you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your > "ko0k". > The provenance of which escapes me. That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive, atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way of expressing things. Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes with a question: >>>>> Sooo... the message? Now here's TOSEM in : http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600 + Just so you know? Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections. SSN, same post in this thread: >>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed. TOSEM in : + At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will + discover his Net activity. Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire. Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300 + -- + + fup set auk Compare that TOSEM post already linked: + -- + r/a/tv added Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space. More information about the k00k is in : http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300 A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and gathering the links and evidence. If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you. But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already. >> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK! >> >> Good catch, kensi. > > You are in the habit of supporting your own posted > material, faulty as it is? It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me. > What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to > screen real estate. Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly asserting, is the real giveaway. Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick with it, ko0ky. And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being outed yet again. Here's some space for you: | | | | | | | | | | You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut: a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's allowed to post to usenet without paying. c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever. *snicker* -- "To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks "A clue, a clue. My kingdom for a clue!!!!" ~Gweggles, in an uncommon moment of self-awareness.