Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22186

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it.

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.usenet.kooks

Show all headers | View raw

On 06/02/2013 5:34 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>>> Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>>>>
>>>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>>>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>>>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>>>>
>>>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>
>>>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>>>>
>>>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>>>>
>>>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>>>
>>> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.
>>
>> His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.
>>
>>> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
>>> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
>>> "ko0k".
>>> The provenance of which escapes me.
>>
>> That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have
> ja
>> the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive,
>> atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way
> ja
>> of expressing things.
>>
>> Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes
> ja
>> with a question:
>>
>>>>>>> Sooo... the message?
>>
>> Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>>
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
>> + Just so you know?
>>
> ja
>> Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.
>>
>> SSN, same post in this thread:
>>
>>>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
>>
> ja
>> TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>>
>> + At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
>> + discover his Net activity.
>>
> ja
>> Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post
>> rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd
> ja
>> frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not
>> to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.
>>
>> Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad>
>>
> ja
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
>> + --
>> +
>> + fup set auk
>>
>> Compare that TOSEM post already linked:
>>
>> + --
>> + r/a/tv added
>>
> ja
>> Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.
>>
>> More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$iti$1@dont-email.me>:
>>
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300
>>
>> A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and
> ja
>> gathering the links and evidence.
>>
>> If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized
> ja
>> Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.
>>
>> But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.
>>
> ja
>>>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>>>>
>>>> Good catch, kensi.
> ja
>>>
>>> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
>>> material, faulty as it is?
>>
>> It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.
> ja
>>
>>> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
>>> screen real estate.
>>
>> Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost
> ja
>> groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you
>> seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this
> ja
>> morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The
>> question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring
>> to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction
> ja
>> all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the
>> baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a
>> random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly
> ja
>> asserting, is the real giveaway.
>>
>> Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be
> ja
>> overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single
>> post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for
> ja
>> one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other
>> kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter
> ja
>> than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick
> ja
>> with it, ko0ky.
>>
>> And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being
> ja
>> outed yet again. Here's some space for you:
> ja
>>
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
>>
>> You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:
> ja
>>
>> a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed
>>
>> b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
> ja
>>     just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
> ja
>>     allowed to post to usenet without paying.
>>
>> c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.
> ja
>>
>> *snicker*
>
> This place where you are the smarter one of many is populated
> by cargoboard cutouts depicting genii holding a keyboard; head adorned
> with a tinfoil propeller decorated fez, ja nein?
>
> Dear Boy.
> Do rejoin reality starting your journey within Maslow's hierarchal pyramid
> in reading <kesqan$itu$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> to build
> a response begging the prayer of redemption.

Is it me, or is the illucid fuckwit actually getting even *more* illucid 
with each passing day?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"A clue, a clue. My kingdom for a clue!!!!"                ~Gweggles,
in an uncommon moment of self-awareness.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Saucer Sized Nipples <garnier@fructis.netnetnet> - 2013-02-03 23:34 +0000
  Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 02:03 -0800
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Royoporus badius <Forest@ElginSt.Pembroke> - 2013-02-04 11:27 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Steve <me@privacy.net> - 2013-02-04 11:31 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-04 19:40 -0500
      Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 02:24 -0800
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-05 13:42 +0100
          Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:08 -0500
            Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-06 11:34 +0100
              Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-06 21:04 -0500
                [OT] Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-07 06:03 +0000
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-07 13:12 +0100
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 04:17 -0800
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:41 -0500

csiph-web