Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22156

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it.

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>> Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>>>
>>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>>>
>>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>>>
>>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>>>
>>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>
>>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>>>
>>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>>>
>>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>>
>> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.
>
>His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.
>
>> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
>> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
>> "ko0k".
>> The provenance of which escapes me.
>
>That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have 
ja
>the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive, 
>atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way 
ja
>of expressing things.
>
>Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes 
ja
>with a question:
>
>>>>>> Sooo... the message?
>
>Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
>+ Just so you know?
>
ja
>Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.
>
>SSN, same post in this thread:
>
>>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
>
ja
>TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>
>+ At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
>+ discover his Net activity.
>
ja
>Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post 
>rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd 
ja
>frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not 
>to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.
>
>Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad>
>
ja
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
>+ --
>+
>+ fup set auk
>
>Compare that TOSEM post already linked:
>
>+ --
>+ r/a/tv added
>
ja
>Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.
>
>More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$iti$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300
>
>A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and 
ja
>gathering the links and evidence.
>
>If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized 
ja
>Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.
>
>But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.
>
ja
>>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>>>
>>> Good catch, kensi.
ja
>>
>> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
>> material, faulty as it is?
>
>It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.
ja
>
>> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
>> screen real estate.
>
>Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost 
ja
>groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you 
>seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this 
ja
>morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The 
>question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring 
>to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction 
ja
>all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the 
>baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a 
>random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly 
ja
>asserting, is the real giveaway.
>
>Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be 
ja
>overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single 
>post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for 
ja
>one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other 
>kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter 
ja
>than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick 
ja
>with it, ko0ky.
>
>And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being 
ja
>outed yet again. Here's some space for you:
ja
>
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
>
>You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:
ja
>
>a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed
>
>b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
ja
>    just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
ja
>    allowed to post to usenet without paying.
>
>c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.
ja
>
>*snicker*

This place where you are the smarter one of many is populated 
by cargoboard cutouts depicting genii holding a keyboard; head adorned
with a tinfoil propeller decorated fez, ja nein?

Dear Boy.
Do rejoin reality starting your journey within Maslow's hierarchal pyramid
in reading <kesqan$itu$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> to build 
a response begging the prayer of redemption.

-- 
De beste wensen voor 2013 en dank je wel voor deze schaal van komedie.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Saucer Sized Nipples <garnier@fructis.netnetnet> - 2013-02-03 23:34 +0000
  Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 02:03 -0800
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Royoporus badius <Forest@ElginSt.Pembroke> - 2013-02-04 11:27 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Steve <me@privacy.net> - 2013-02-04 11:31 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-04 19:40 -0500
      Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 02:24 -0800
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-05 13:42 +0100
          Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:08 -0500
            Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-06 11:34 +0100
              Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-06 21:04 -0500
                [OT] Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-07 06:03 +0000
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-07 13:12 +0100
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 04:17 -0800
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:41 -0500

csiph-web