Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22195

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it.

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Feb 7, 12:12 pm, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net>
wrote:
> kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >On 06/02/2013 5:34 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
> >> kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>> On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
> >>>> Andrew Wilson <awils984...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>
> >>>>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>
> >>>>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>
> >>>>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
> >>>>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>
> >>>>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
> >>>>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
> >>>>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>
> >>>>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>
> >>>>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er...@news.albasani.net>
> >>>>>>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>
> >>>>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>
> >>>>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>
> >>>> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.
>
> >>> His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.
>
> >>>> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
> >>>> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
> >>>> "ko0k".
> >>>> The provenance of which escapes me.
>
> >>> That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have
> >> ja
> >>> the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive,
> >>> atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way
> >> ja
> >>> of expressing things.
>
> >>> Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes
> >> ja
> >>> with a question:
>
> >>>>>>>> Sooo... the message?
>
> >>> Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pq...@news.albasani.net>:
>
> >>>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
> >>> + Just so you know?
>
> >> ja
> >>> Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.
>
> >>> SSN, same post in this thread:
>
> >>>>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
>
> >> ja
> >>> TOSEM in <kai9rn$pq...@news.albasani.net>:
>
> >>> + At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
> >>> + discover his Net activity.
>
> >> ja
> >>> Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post
> >>> rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd
> >> ja
> >>> frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not
> >>> to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.
>
> >>> Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4...@newsfe13.iad>
>
> >> ja
> >>>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
> >>> + --
> >>> +
> >>> + fup set auk
>
> >>> Compare that TOSEM post already linked:
>
> >>> + --
> >>> + r/a/tv added
>
> >> ja
> >>> Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.
>
> >>> More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$it...@dont-email.me>:
>
> >>>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300
>
> >>> A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and
> >> ja
> >>> gathering the links and evidence.
>
> >>> If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized
> >> ja
> >>> Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.
>
> >>> But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.
>
> >> ja
> >>>>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>
> >>>>> Good catch, kensi.
> >> ja
>
> >>>> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
> >>>> material, faulty as it is?
>
> >>> It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.
> >> ja
>
> >>>> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
> >>>> screen real estate.
>
> >>> Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost
> >> ja
> >>> groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you
> >>> seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this
> >> ja
> >>> morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The
> >>> question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring
> >>> to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction
> >> ja
> >>> all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the
> >>> baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a
> >>> random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly
> >> ja
> >>> asserting, is the real giveaway.
>
> >>> Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be
> >> ja
> >>> overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single
> >>> post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for
> >> ja
> >>> one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other
> >>> kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter
> >> ja
> >>> than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick
> >> ja
> >>> with it, ko0ky.
>
> >>> And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being
> >> ja
> >>> outed yet again. Here's some space for you:
> >> ja
>
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
>
> >>> You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:
> >> ja
>
> >>> a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed
>
> >>> b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
> >> ja
> >>>     just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
> >> ja
> >>>     allowed to post to usenet without paying.
>
> >>> c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.
> >> ja
>
> >>> *snicker*
>
> >> This place where you are the smarter one of many is populated
> >> by cargoboard cutouts depicting genii holding a keyboard; head adorned
> >> with a tinfoil propeller decorated fez, ja nein?
>
> >> Dear Boy.
> >> Do rejoin reality starting your journey within Maslow's hierarchal pyramid
> >> in reading <kesqan$it...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> to build
> >> a response begging the prayer of redemption.
>
> >Is it me, or is the illucid fuckwit actually getting even *more* illucid
> >with each passing day?
>
> How easily you peel back your veneer to reveal your hierarchal position.
> A simple challenge to your fabrication has you rolling in the gutter.

And what alleged "fabrication" of kensi's would that be, kook?
Citation needed.

> We are all done here.

That mean you're finally done kooking out in all these newsgroups?

Aww. And the fun was just starting. I was really hoping to see you
flip out to the point of earning yourself a Bobo.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Saucer Sized Nipples <garnier@fructis.netnetnet> - 2013-02-03 23:34 +0000
  Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 02:03 -0800
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Royoporus badius <Forest@ElginSt.Pembroke> - 2013-02-04 11:27 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Steve <me@privacy.net> - 2013-02-04 11:31 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-04 19:40 -0500
      Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 02:24 -0800
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-05 13:42 +0100
          Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:08 -0500
            Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-06 11:34 +0100
              Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-06 21:04 -0500
                [OT] Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-07 06:03 +0000
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-07 13:12 +0100
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 04:17 -0800
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:41 -0500

csiph-web