Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #22063 > unrolled thread

Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it.

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Saucer Sized Nipples <garnier@fructis.netnetnet> - 2013-02-03 23:34 +0000
    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-04 02:03 -0800
      Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Royoporus badius <Forest@ElginSt.Pembroke> - 2013-02-04 11:27 +0000
      Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Steve <me@privacy.net> - 2013-02-04 11:31 +0000
      Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-04 19:40 -0500
        Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-05 02:24 -0800
          Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-05 13:42 +0100
            Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:08 -0500
              Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-06 11:34 +0100
                Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-06 21:04 -0500
                  [OT] Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. snipe@spambin.fsnet.co.uk (Sn!pe) - 2013-02-07 06:03 +0000
                  Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <ewl@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net> - 2013-02-07 13:12 +0100
                    Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> - 2013-02-07 04:17 -0800
          Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it. kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2013-02-05 17:41 -0500

#22063 — Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it.

Goblin <bytes4free@googlemail.com> wrote:
>On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>> Not to mention "playing".
>
>Didn't notice the "paying"......
>
heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.

>I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list 
>of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>
no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".

>Are you into "roll paying" games? 
>
You are not aware of the half of it, that much is obvious.
Wilson/Kensi/Nadegda/Phoenix are all the four arms of the 
Bodhisattva that would be the comptroller of alt.usenet.kooks
and/or any other newsgroup one Paul G Derbyshire gets 
booted from - shunned if you like. pffft.

>You'll incur the wrath of the might 
>jeff there too.... of course Jeff's communication and email skills don't 
>stretch to finding out what it is he is trying to cheapen - which is 
>certainly not role-play - "paying" "rolling" or otherwise.
>
I deny your "trying" statement to call it "perseveres in", no less
a performance akin to Monty Python's Black Knight.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Knight_(Monty_Python)

Assuming you too (in a cast of hundreds) are not another
cavitation in the wake of the troll, the news Relf has been trolled 
(successfully) by the aforementioned Derbyshire long
into the mists of time - the first instance of which I have 
found is here <Jeff_Relf_2005_Feb_26_x5dS @Cotse.NET>
with an update requested here;
<399Os.83102$532.27708 @newsfe03.iad>
... may well bring a wry grin to your evening read?

Put in the light of like attributes (shared by both trollers)
your sense of the ridiculous being hilarious may strengthen?
^Both hold a depth of despise for CLI, not universally shared.
That chagrin displayed ably in their insistence on changing
Usenet interfaces to fit the all dancing all singing GUI 
"dumbed down" environment they both leech offn.
^Both believe they are accomplished code writers, unpublished.
That small anomaly in their lives being excused internally by
their belief they are as yet undiscovered geniuses! 
	haw haw.
^Both are sexually amorphous, although Derbyshire does
display an effeminate outlook, reflected in his choice to run
female personas as a preference. It could be concluded
Derbyshire would engage with a male IF he could find 
a body which would accept his weirdo ideologies.
^Both are completely immersed in themselves, to the point
there is no Life beyond the frame of that GUI stared at 24/7.
Luckily for Usenet this facet is their undoing as the shared 
experiences of many owning differing POV truly bring them 
frothing to the keyboard.
^Both are bottom of the barrel losers, living wholly sustained
on handouts. Whilst not an uncommon feature of many
Usenet publicists today it is rare to find others so dedicated
in bringing turmoil as personal satisfaction, all the while 
losing, bigtime.

There is however one singe significant difference.
Relf is relatively harmless, a dribbling baboon whose
work is easily deleted, Derbyshire, not so.
Paul G D has a bent... one that is maybe dangerous to
the unwary, revenge.
Two factors which are absolutes for Paul G D.
1. His posts will always challenge, in a defense mode.
2. His posting techniques are all stolen, he copies
and uses what he sees as having "worked".

The most recent foray is to entrap the innocent as
a means to silencing those critics.
The method is simple, done before, successfully.
1. A post is made owning content which may inflame
someone outside of Usenet.
2. The post - through a campaign of "s/h/e done it" -
is attributed to the target.
3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
Using that same mix of odds which makes the Nigerian 
scam so successful there is a very good chance of 
a someone bringing litigation, not against Derbyshire
the instigator but against his target. The purpose of
which is only to incur financial burdens on the target.
	(one admission is here - 
	<kemhvc$9p1$2 @news.albasani.net>
	with both Wilson/kensi sox "at it")
Derbyshire's most recent campaign - in which he 
attempted to incite the owner of a business into
litigation - fell flat when his claim the target had
taken photos of a lot were proven to be Google Earth
images fabricated by Derbyshire himself no less.
The fiasco exposed here; 
<kdno2i$gho$1 @speranza.aioe.org> 
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135898786700

Sooo... the message?
cave quid dicis, quando, et cui


http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en
search--------who is Seamus Derbyshire?


-- 

replyTo: alt.usenet.kooks

that video where Derbyshire expresses a desire for frisky goat;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be

Paul's pik
http://www.imagebam.com/image/44d69d232251662

Paul's Whine on Everything
Derbyshire k00k http://off.st/7LE
http://wayback.archive.org/web/20081013201552/http://66.39.71.195/Derbyshire/index.html

Paul's Usenet BIO
Derbyshire k00k http://off.st/PBN
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.kia-mennie/msg/8cc902d26eb5ee58?dmode=source

Paul's Mandelbrot
Derbyshire k00k http://off.st/thS
http://wayback.archive.org/web/20121022211703/http://66.39.71.195/Derbyshire/mandlfaq.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#22067

On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
wrote:
> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> >> Not to mention "playing".
>
> >Didn't notice the "paying"......
>
> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>
> >I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
> >of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>
> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>
> >Are you into "roll paying" games?
>
> You are not aware of the half of it, that much is obvious.
> Wilson/Kensi/Nadegda/Phoenix are all the four arms of the
> Bodhisattva that would be the comptroller of alt.usenet.kooks
> and/or any other newsgroup one Paul G Derbyshire gets
> booted from - shunned if you like. pffft.
>
> >You'll incur the wrath of the might
> >jeff there too.... of course Jeff's communication and email skills don't
> >stretch to finding out what it is he is trying to cheapen - which is
> >certainly not role-play - "paying" "rolling" or otherwise.
>
> I deny your "trying" statement to call it "perseveres in", no less
> a performance akin to Monty Python's Black Knight.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Knight_(Monty_Python)
>
> Assuming you too (in a cast of hundreds) are not another
> cavitation in the wake of the troll, the news Relf has been trolled
> (successfully) by the aforementioned Derbyshire long
> into the mists of time - the first instance of which I have
> found is here <Jeff_Relf_2005_Feb_26_x5dS @Cotse.NET>
> with an update requested here;
> <399Os.83102$532.27708 @newsfe03.iad>
> ... may well bring a wry grin to your evening read?
>
> Put in the light of like attributes (shared by both trollers)
> your sense of the ridiculous being hilarious may strengthen?
> ^Both hold a depth of despise for CLI, not universally shared.
> That chagrin displayed ably in their insistence on changing
> Usenet interfaces to fit the all dancing all singing GUI
> "dumbed down" environment they both leech offn.
> ^Both believe they are accomplished code writers, unpublished.
> That small anomaly in their lives being excused internally by
> their belief they are as yet undiscovered geniuses!
>         haw haw.
> ^Both are sexually amorphous, although Derbyshire does
> display an effeminate outlook, reflected in his choice to run
> female personas as a preference. It could be concluded
> Derbyshire would engage with a male IF he could find
> a body which would accept his weirdo ideologies.
> ^Both are completely immersed in themselves, to the point
> there is no Life beyond the frame of that GUI stared at 24/7.
> Luckily for Usenet this facet is their undoing as the shared
> experiences of many owning differing POV truly bring them
> frothing to the keyboard.
> ^Both are bottom of the barrel losers, living wholly sustained
> on handouts. Whilst not an uncommon feature of many
> Usenet publicists today it is rare to find others so dedicated
> in bringing turmoil as personal satisfaction, all the while
> losing, bigtime.
>
> There is however one singe significant difference.
> Relf is relatively harmless, a dribbling baboon whose
> work is easily deleted, Derbyshire, not so.
> Paul G D has a bent... one that is maybe dangerous to
> the unwary, revenge.
> Two factors which are absolutes for Paul G D.
> 1. His posts will always challenge, in a defense mode.
> 2. His posting techniques are all stolen, he copies
> and uses what he sees as having "worked".
>
> The most recent foray is to entrap the innocent as
> a means to silencing those critics.
> The method is simple, done before, successfully.
> 1. A post is made owning content which may inflame
> someone outside of Usenet.
> 2. The post - through a campaign of "s/h/e done it" -
> is attributed to the target.
> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
> Using that same mix of odds which makes the Nigerian
> scam so successful there is a very good chance of
> a someone bringing litigation, not against Derbyshire
> the instigator but against his target. The purpose of
> which is only to incur financial burdens on the target.
>         (one admission is here -
>         <kemhvc$9p1$2 @news.albasani.net>
>         with both Wilson/kensi sox "at it")
> Derbyshire's most recent campaign - in which he
> attempted to incite the owner of a business into
> litigation - fell flat when his claim the target had
> taken photos of a lot were proven to be Google Earth
> images fabricated by Derbyshire himself no less.
> The fiasco exposed here;
> <kdno2i$gho$1 @speranza.aioe.org>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135898786700
>
> Sooo... the message?
> cave quid dicis, quando, et cui
>
> http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en
> search--------who is Seamus Derbyshire?
>
> --
>
> replyTo: alt.usenet.kooks
>
> that video where Derbyshire expresses a desire for frisky goat;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdyBYSuqQBQ&feature=youtu.be
>
> Paul's pikhttp://www.imagebam.com/image/44d69d232251662
>
> Paul's Whine on Everything
> Derbyshire k00khttp://off.st/7LEhttp://wayback.archive.org/web/20081013201552/http://66.39.71.195/Der...
>
> Paul's Usenet BIO
> Derbyshire k00khttp://off.st/PBNhttp://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.kia-mennie/msg/8cc902d26eb5ee5...
>
> Paul's Mandelbrot
> Derbyshire k00khttp://off.st/thShttp://wayback.archive.org/web/20121022211703/http://66.39.71.195/Der...

Wow. Hundreds of lines of screed; an epic kookout over the Derbyshire
demon that haunts his skull.

And look at the timestamps on this and several other of his recent
posts. Can we nominate this kook for a Rubber Turkey for screeding
nonstop all through the Superbowl?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22071

Andrew Wilson Derbyshire <twisted0n3@gmail.com> wrote another Tor
<.@googlegroups.com> luzer post to spew

angry much Duurrbs?

/laffs/

>
>And look at the timestamps on this and several other of his recent
>posts. Can we nominate this kook for a Rubber Turkey for screeding
>nonstop all through the Superbowl?

run that recording again Paula.. yew missed some plays. haw haw

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22072

Paul Derbyshire socked up as Andrew Wilson and wrote:
[...]
> Can we nominate this kook for a Rubber Turkey for screeding
> nonstop all through the Superbowl?

WTF is the Superbowl, Fugly?

-- 
"My brother has Asperger's, which is kind of like
a high functioning form of autism"
Ian Derbyshire talking about his freaky brother Paul.
http://kydaimon.livejournal.com/
And this is the autistic freak's mugshot
http://www.imagebam.com/image/44d69d232251662

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22099

On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
> wrote:
>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>
>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>
>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>
>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>
>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".

How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote

Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500

+ I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"

and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.

>>> Are you into "roll paying" games?
>>
>> You are not aware of the half of it, that much is obvious.
>> Wilson/Kensi/Nadegda/Phoenix are all the four arms of the
>> Bodhisattva t<MUSHROOM CLOUD>

Apparently, I'm a 50-foot-tall Hindu goddess! Who knew?

*snicker*

Anyone ever point out to him that maybe it's not wise to intentionally 
try to harass and annoy someone who you believe is such a being?

> Wow. Hundreds of lines of screed; an epic kookout over the Derbyshire
> demon that haunts his skull.

Still doesn't hold a candle to the "I just do not fskn believe" rant of 
legend, though. I'm still waiting to see him flip out that violently again.

> And look at the timestamps on this and several other of his recent
> posts. Can we nominate this kook for a Rubber Turkey for screeding
> nonstop all through the Superbowl?

NO! :P

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"A clue, a clue. My kingdom for a clue!!!!"                ~Gweggles,
in an uncommon moment of self-awareness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22112

On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> > On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
> > wrote:
> >> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> >>>> Not to mention "playing".
>
> >>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>
> >> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>
> >>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
> >>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>
> >> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
> >> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
> >> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>
> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>
> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>
> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>
> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.

Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!

Good catch, kensi.

> >>> Are you into "roll paying" games?
>
> >> You are not aware of the half of it, that much is obvious.
> >> Wilson/Kensi/Nadegda/Phoenix are all the four arms of the
> >> Bodhisattva t<MUSHROOM CLOUD>
>
> Apparently, I'm a 50-foot-tall Hindu goddess! Who knew?
>
> *snicker*
>
> Anyone ever point out to him that maybe it's not wise to intentionally
> try to harass and annoy someone who you believe is such a being?

IMO, the kook is too far gone to realize even such basic implications
of his kooky beliefs.

> > Wow. Hundreds of lines of screed; an epic kookout over the Derbyshire
> > demon that haunts his skull.
>
> Still doesn't hold a candle to the "I just do not fskn believe" rant of
> legend, though. I'm still waiting to see him flip out that violently again.

That one's headed for a Bobo, is my considered opinion.

> > And look at the timestamps on this and several other of his recent
> > posts. Can we nominate this kook for a Rubber Turkey for screeding
> > nonstop all through the Superbowl?
>
> NO! :P

On Feb 5, 1:11 AM, Nadegda <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:03:31 -0800, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>
>> Can we nominate this kook for a Rubber Turkey for screeding
>> nonstop all through the Superbowl?
>
> NO!
>
> Absolutely not. There's nothing at all kooky about not "observing" the
> religious holiday of the Pigskin Tribe and their funny-looking brown
> leather idol.
>
> Sorry.

Okay, okay ... yeesh. For some of us it is nearly as big an occasion
as Thanksgiving or Christmas. Don't get your panties all in a
twist. :-)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22113

Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>> > On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>> > wrote:
>> >> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> >>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>> >>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>
>> >>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>
>> >> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>
>> >>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>> >>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>
>> >> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>> >> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>> >> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>
>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>
>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>
>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>
>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>
Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.
In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
"ko0k".
The provenance of which escapes me.

>Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>
>Good catch, kensi.
>
You are in the habit of supporting your own posted 
material, faulty as it is?

What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to 
screen real estate.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22132

On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
> Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>>
>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>>
>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>>
>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>>
>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>>
>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>>
>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>
>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>>
>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>>
>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>
> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.

His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.

> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
> "ko0k".
> The provenance of which escapes me.

That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have 
the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive, 
atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way 
of expressing things.

Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes 
with a question:

>>>>> Sooo... the message?

Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
+ Just so you know?

Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.

SSN, same post in this thread:

>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.

TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:

+ At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
+ discover his Net activity.

Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post 
rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd 
frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not 
to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.

Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad>

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
+ --
+
+ fup set auk

Compare that TOSEM post already linked:

+ --
+ r/a/tv added

Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.

More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$iti$1@dont-email.me>:

http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300

A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and 
gathering the links and evidence.

If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized 
Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.

But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.

>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>>
>> Good catch, kensi.
>
> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
> material, faulty as it is?

It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.

> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
> screen real estate.

Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost 
groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you 
seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this 
morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The 
question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring 
to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction 
all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the 
baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a 
random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly 
asserting, is the real giveaway.

Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be 
overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single 
post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for 
one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other 
kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter 
than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick 
with it, ko0ky.

And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being 
outed yet again. Here's some space for you:

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:

a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed

b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
    just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
    allowed to post to usenet without paying.

c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.

*snicker*

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"A clue, a clue. My kingdom for a clue!!!!"                ~Gweggles,
in an uncommon moment of self-awareness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22156

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>> Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>>>
>>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>>>
>>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>>>
>>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>>>
>>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>>>
>>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>
>>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>>>
>>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>>>
>>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>>
>> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.
>
>His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.
>
>> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
>> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
>> "ko0k".
>> The provenance of which escapes me.
>
>That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have 
ja
>the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive, 
>atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way 
ja
>of expressing things.
>
>Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes 
ja
>with a question:
>
>>>>>> Sooo... the message?
>
>Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
>+ Just so you know?
>
ja
>Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.
>
>SSN, same post in this thread:
>
>>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
>
ja
>TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>
>+ At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
>+ discover his Net activity.
>
ja
>Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post 
>rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd 
ja
>frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not 
>to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.
>
>Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad>
>
ja
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
>+ --
>+
>+ fup set auk
>
>Compare that TOSEM post already linked:
>
>+ --
>+ r/a/tv added
>
ja
>Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.
>
>More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$iti$1@dont-email.me>:
>
>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300
>
>A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and 
ja
>gathering the links and evidence.
>
>If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized 
ja
>Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.
>
>But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.
>
ja
>>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>>>
>>> Good catch, kensi.
ja
>>
>> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
>> material, faulty as it is?
>
>It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.
ja
>
>> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
>> screen real estate.
>
>Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost 
ja
>groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you 
>seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this 
ja
>morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The 
>question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring 
>to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction 
ja
>all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the 
>baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a 
>random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly 
ja
>asserting, is the real giveaway.
>
>Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be 
ja
>overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single 
>post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for 
ja
>one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other 
>kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter 
ja
>than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick 
ja
>with it, ko0ky.
>
>And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being 
ja
>outed yet again. Here's some space for you:
ja
>
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
ja
>|
>
>You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:
ja
>
>a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed
>
>b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
ja
>    just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
ja
>    allowed to post to usenet without paying.
>
>c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.
ja
>
>*snicker*

This place where you are the smarter one of many is populated 
by cargoboard cutouts depicting genii holding a keyboard; head adorned
with a tinfoil propeller decorated fez, ja nein?

Dear Boy.
Do rejoin reality starting your journey within Maslow's hierarchal pyramid
in reading <kesqan$itu$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> to build 
a response begging the prayer of redemption.

-- 
De beste wensen voor 2013 en dank je wel voor deze schaal van komedie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22186

On 06/02/2013 5:34 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>>> Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>>>>
>>>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>>>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>>>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>>>>
>>>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>>>>
>>>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>
>>>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>>>>
>>>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>>>>
>>>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>>>
>>> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.
>>
>> His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.
>>
>>> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
>>> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
>>> "ko0k".
>>> The provenance of which escapes me.
>>
>> That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have
> ja
>> the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive,
>> atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way
> ja
>> of expressing things.
>>
>> Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes
> ja
>> with a question:
>>
>>>>>>> Sooo... the message?
>>
>> Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>>
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
>> + Just so you know?
>>
> ja
>> Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.
>>
>> SSN, same post in this thread:
>>
>>>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
>>
> ja
>> TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>>
>> + At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
>> + discover his Net activity.
>>
> ja
>> Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post
>> rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd
> ja
>> frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not
>> to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.
>>
>> Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad>
>>
> ja
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
>> + --
>> +
>> + fup set auk
>>
>> Compare that TOSEM post already linked:
>>
>> + --
>> + r/a/tv added
>>
> ja
>> Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.
>>
>> More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$iti$1@dont-email.me>:
>>
>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300
>>
>> A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and
> ja
>> gathering the links and evidence.
>>
>> If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized
> ja
>> Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.
>>
>> But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.
>>
> ja
>>>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>>>>
>>>> Good catch, kensi.
> ja
>>>
>>> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
>>> material, faulty as it is?
>>
>> It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.
> ja
>>
>>> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
>>> screen real estate.
>>
>> Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost
> ja
>> groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you
>> seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this
> ja
>> morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The
>> question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring
>> to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction
> ja
>> all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the
>> baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a
>> random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly
> ja
>> asserting, is the real giveaway.
>>
>> Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be
> ja
>> overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single
>> post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for
> ja
>> one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other
>> kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter
> ja
>> than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick
> ja
>> with it, ko0ky.
>>
>> And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being
> ja
>> outed yet again. Here's some space for you:
> ja
>>
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
> ja
>> |
>>
>> You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:
> ja
>>
>> a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed
>>
>> b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
> ja
>>     just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
> ja
>>     allowed to post to usenet without paying.
>>
>> c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.
> ja
>>
>> *snicker*
>
> This place where you are the smarter one of many is populated
> by cargoboard cutouts depicting genii holding a keyboard; head adorned
> with a tinfoil propeller decorated fez, ja nein?
>
> Dear Boy.
> Do rejoin reality starting your journey within Maslow's hierarchal pyramid
> in reading <kesqan$itu$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> to build
> a response begging the prayer of redemption.

Is it me, or is the illucid fuckwit actually getting even *more* illucid 
with each passing day?

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"A clue, a clue. My kingdom for a clue!!!!"                ~Gweggles,
in an uncommon moment of self-awareness.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22189 — [OT] Re: Usenet is cool, I enjoy it.

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:

> Is it me, or is the illucid fuckwit actually getting even *more* illucid
> with each passing day?

It's you. 

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe       <snipe@notforspam.fsnet.co.uk>

My pet rock Gordon just is. 
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22194

kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>On 06/02/2013 5:34 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>> kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
>>>> Andrew Wilson <awils9845x0@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>>>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>>>>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>>>>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>
>>>>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>>>>>
>>>>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>>>>
>>>> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.
>>>
>>> His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.
>>>
>>>> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
>>>> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
>>>> "ko0k".
>>>> The provenance of which escapes me.
>>>
>>> That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have
>> ja
>>> the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive,
>>> atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way
>> ja
>>> of expressing things.
>>>
>>> Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes
>> ja
>>> with a question:
>>>
>>>>>>>> Sooo... the message?
>>>
>>> Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>>>
>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
>>> + Just so you know?
>>>
>> ja
>>> Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.
>>>
>>> SSN, same post in this thread:
>>>
>>>>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
>>>
>> ja
>>> TOSEM in <kai9rn$pqu$1@news.albasani.net>:
>>>
>>> + At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
>>> + discover his Net activity.
>>>
>> ja
>>> Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post
>>> rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd
>> ja
>>> frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not
>>> to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.
>>>
>>> Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4250@newsfe13.iad>
>>>
>> ja
>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
>>> + --
>>> +
>>> + fup set auk
>>>
>>> Compare that TOSEM post already linked:
>>>
>>> + --
>>> + r/a/tv added
>>>
>> ja
>>> Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.
>>>
>>> More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$iti$1@dont-email.me>:
>>>
>>> http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300
>>>
>>> A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and
>> ja
>>> gathering the links and evidence.
>>>
>>> If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized
>> ja
>>> Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.
>>>
>>> But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.
>>>
>> ja
>>>>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>>>>>
>>>>> Good catch, kensi.
>> ja
>>>>
>>>> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
>>>> material, faulty as it is?
>>>
>>> It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.
>> ja
>>>
>>>> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
>>>> screen real estate.
>>>
>>> Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost
>> ja
>>> groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you
>>> seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this
>> ja
>>> morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The
>>> question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring
>>> to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction
>> ja
>>> all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the
>>> baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a
>>> random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly
>> ja
>>> asserting, is the real giveaway.
>>>
>>> Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be
>> ja
>>> overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single
>>> post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for
>> ja
>>> one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other
>>> kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter
>> ja
>>> than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick
>> ja
>>> with it, ko0ky.
>>>
>>> And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being
>> ja
>>> outed yet again. Here's some space for you:
>> ja
>>>
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>> ja
>>> |
>>>
>>> You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:
>> ja
>>>
>>> a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed
>>>
>>> b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
>> ja
>>>     just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
>> ja
>>>     allowed to post to usenet without paying.
>>>
>>> c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.
>> ja
>>>
>>> *snicker*
>>
>> This place where you are the smarter one of many is populated
>> by cargoboard cutouts depicting genii holding a keyboard; head adorned
>> with a tinfoil propeller decorated fez, ja nein?
>>
>> Dear Boy.
>> Do rejoin reality starting your journey within Maslow's hierarchal pyramid
>> in reading <kesqan$itu$1@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> to build
>> a response begging the prayer of redemption.
>
>Is it me, or is the illucid fuckwit actually getting even *more* illucid 
>with each passing day?

How easily you peel back your veneer to reveal your hierarchal position.
A simple challenge to your fabrication has you rolling in the gutter.

We are all done here.
-- 
De beste wensen voor 2013 en dank je wel voor deze schaal van komedie.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22195

On Feb 7, 12:12 pm, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy <e...@NOSEPAMdrlobotomy.net>
wrote:
> kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >On 06/02/2013 5:34 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
> >> kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>> On 05/02/2013 7:42 AM, Rev.Dr. LoBotomy wrote:
> >>>> Andrew Wilson <awils984...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>
> >>>>>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>
> >>>>>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>
> >>>>>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
> >>>>>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>
> >>>>>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
> >>>>>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
> >>>>>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>
> >>>>>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>
> >>>>>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er...@news.albasani.net>
> >>>>>>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>
> >>>>>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>
> >>>>>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>
> >>>> Your link fails to verify your claim of interpretation.
>
> >>> His constant morphing *combined* with that link does, however.
>
> >>>> In your excuse do also illustrate how you see the post
> >>>> you refer to is linked to the post you attribute to your
> >>>> "ko0k".
> >>>> The provenance of which escapes me.
>
> >>> That's been discussed a zillion times, but note also how both posts have
> >> ja
> >>> the same very odd patterns of language use. Extremely distinctive,
> >>> atypical, semi-babbling, semi-coherent, verbose and circumlocutious way
> >> ja
> >>> of expressing things.
>
> >>> Note how "Saucer Sized Nipples", oddly, introduces a paragraph sometimes
> >> ja
> >>> with a question:
>
> >>>>>>>> Sooo... the message?
>
> >>> Now here's TOSEM in <kai9rn$pq...@news.albasani.net>:
>
> >>>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010009600
> >>> + Just so you know?
>
> >> ja
> >>> Then there's this odd use of parenthesized interjections.
>
> >>> SSN, same post in this thread:
>
> >>>>>>>> 3. The righteous (informant) email is then deployed.
>
> >> ja
> >>> TOSEM in <kai9rn$pq...@news.albasani.net>:
>
> >>> + At home (reality) that changes, Paul is well skeered his Town will
> >>> + discover his Net activity.
>
> >> ja
> >>> Both also have ".signatures" that add aside remarks to the main post
> >>> rather than actually being .sigs and both gabble on in the same odd
> >> ja
> >>> frothy, jumping from one idea to another seemingly randomly, manner. Not
> >>> to mention share the same obsession with the mysterious Mr. Derbyshire.
>
> >>> Then there's another SSN post: <2uCPs.17625$H22.4...@newsfe13.iad>
>
> >> ja
> >>>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=136010097300
> >>> + --
> >>> +
> >>> + fup set auk
>
> >>> Compare that TOSEM post already linked:
>
> >>> + --
> >>> + r/a/tv added
>
> >> ja
> >>> Even more similarly ko0ky misuse of the .sig space.
>
> >>> More information about the k00k is in <k23rtr$it...@dont-email.me>:
>
> >>>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=134855020300
>
> >>> A hat tip to Nadegda for compiling much of that information and
> >> ja
> >>> gathering the links and evidence.
>
> >>> If you're *still* not convinced that both "TOSEM" and "Saucer Sized
> >> ja
> >>> Nipples" are socks of the same kOok, then I doubt I can help you.
>
> >>> But then, since *you* are that same kOok, you should know all this already.
>
> >> ja
> >>>>> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>
> >>>>> Good catch, kensi.
> >> ja
>
> >>>> You are in the habit of supporting your own posted
> >>>> material, faulty as it is?
>
> >>> It's not faulty and Andrew Wilson isn't me.
> >> ja
>
> >>>> What strange tides you Xpoast philistines bring to
> >>>> screen real estate.
>
> >>> Don't bother pretending to be someone from one of the other crosspost
> >> ja
> >>> groups, ko0ky -- we all know exactly who you are. Interestingly, you
> >>> seem to have decided to forge the From of an existing usenetter this
> >> ja
> >>> morph. But your odd mannerisms again gave you away. The
> >>> question-that's-really-a-statement, "your own posted material", "bring
> >>> to screen real estate", and your general clumsy sentence construction
> >> ja
> >>> all added to the circumstantial evidence, but your jumping to the
> >>> baseless claim that Andrew is my sock, something Murphy believes but a
> >>> random visitor from another froup would have zero likelihood of randomly
> >> ja
> >>> asserting, is the real giveaway.
>
> >>> Now when are you going to give up morphing? The evidence must be
> >> ja
> >>> overwhelming by now that you can't pass as normal for even one single
> >>> post under a new name, or even pass as "someone other than Murphy" for
> >> ja
> >>> one single post. I'm smarter than you. Nadegda, Andrew, and the other
> >>> kookologists are smarter than you. Probably most of the planet's smarter
> >> ja
> >>> than you. Your constant nymshifting is futile. Pick a name and stick
> >> ja
> >>> with it, ko0ky.
>
> >>> And then you may go ahead and foam on at length in your rage at being
> >> ja
> >>> outed yet again. Here's some space for you:
> >> ja
>
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
> >> ja
> >>> |
>
> >>> You may also choose any of these three themes for your ko0k0ut:
> >> ja
>
> >>> a) Blistering anti-Derbyshire screed
>
> >>> b) Rant about how it's *just not fair*!!1 that free NSP admins won't
> >> ja
> >>>     just do as you instruct them to and give you control over who's
> >> ja
> >>>     allowed to post to usenet without paying.
>
> >>> c) Incoherent babble with no identifiable topic whatsoever.
> >> ja
>
> >>> *snicker*
>
> >> This place where you are the smarter one of many is populated
> >> by cargoboard cutouts depicting genii holding a keyboard; head adorned
> >> with a tinfoil propeller decorated fez, ja nein?
>
> >> Dear Boy.
> >> Do rejoin reality starting your journey within Maslow's hierarchal pyramid
> >> in reading <kesqan$it...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> to build
> >> a response begging the prayer of redemption.
>
> >Is it me, or is the illucid fuckwit actually getting even *more* illucid
> >with each passing day?
>
> How easily you peel back your veneer to reveal your hierarchal position.
> A simple challenge to your fabrication has you rolling in the gutter.

And what alleged "fabrication" of kensi's would that be, kook?
Citation needed.

> We are all done here.

That mean you're finally done kooking out in all these newsgroups?

Aww. And the fun was just starting. I was really hoping to see you
flip out to the point of earning yourself a Bobo.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#22135

On 05/02/2013 5:24 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
> On Feb 5, 12:40 am, kensi <kkensingto...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On 04/02/2013 5:03 AM, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>> On Feb 3, 11:34 pm, Saucer Sized Nipples <garn...@fructis.netnetnet>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Goblin <bytes4f...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 03/02/13 09:49, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>>>>> Not to mention "playing".
>>
>>>>> Didn't notice the "paying"......
>>
>>>> heh. You fall into that set piece of the grammar troll, friend.
>>
>>>>> I'd watch out, you will end up in Jeff's special plonk list.... The list
>>>>> of people he says he ignores...until that is he responds then he's not.
>>
>>>> no. Relf subscribes to that stupid, truly stupid mantra where "shunning"
>>>> is an effective tool of Usenet. I say "subscribes" in the sense Relf plays
>>>> that fiddle using his own lines, lines that read "I shall not be shunned".
>>
>> How ironic, coming from the ko0k that wrote
>>
>> Message-ID: <kcv480$er9$1@news.albasani.net>http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=135841661500
>>
>> + I cannot however live with having my posts scored "kill"
>>
>> and who constantly morphs to escape killfiles.
>
> Blergh, I missed that SPNAK!
>
> Good catch, kensi.

Thanks.

>>>>> Are you into "roll paying" games?
>>
>>>> You are not aware of the half of it, that much is obvious.
>>>> Wilson/Kensi/Nadegda/Phoenix are all the four arms of the
>>>> Bodhisattva t<MUSHROOM CLOUD>
>>
>> Apparently, I'm a 50-foot-tall Hindu goddess! Who knew?
>>
>> *snicker*
>>
>> Anyone ever point out to him that maybe it's not wise to intentionally
>> try to harass and annoy someone who you believe is such a being?
>
> IMO, the kook is too far gone to realize even such basic implications
> of his kooky beliefs.

Yeah. Shit Rot, too, it seems. No hope for either of them.

>>> Wow. Hundreds of lines of screed; an epic kookout over the Derbyshire
>>> demon that haunts his skull.
>>
>> Still doesn't hold a candle to the "I just do not fskn believe" rant of
>> legend, though. I'm still waiting to see him flip out that violently again.
>
> That one's headed for a Bobo, is my considered opinion.

Most likely.

>>> And look at the timestamps on this and several other of his recent
>>> posts. Can we nominate this kook for a Rubber Turkey for screeding
>>> nonstop all through the Superbowl?
>>
>> NO! :P
>
> On Feb 5, 1:11 AM, Nadegda <nad318b...@gmail.invalid> wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 02:03:31 -0800, Andrew Wilson wrote:
>>
>>> Can we nominate this kook for a Rubber Turkey for screeding
>>> nonstop all through the Superbowl?
>>
>> NO!
>>
>> Absolutely not. There's nothing at all kooky about not "observing" the
>> religious holiday of the Pigskin Tribe and their funny-looking brown
>> leather idol.
>>
>> Sorry.
>
> Okay, okay ... yeesh. For some of us it is nearly as big an occasion
> as Thanksgiving or Christmas. Don't get your panties all in a
> twist. :-)

Heh. Nadegda and I had the exact same reaction it seems. :)

-- 
"To explain the unknown by the known is a logical procedure; to explain
the known by the unknown is a form of theological lunacy." ~David Brooks
"A clue, a clue. My kingdom for a clue!!!!"                ~Gweggles,
in an uncommon moment of self-awareness.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer

csiph-web