Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25914

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)

From Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.os.os2.advocacy, comp.text.tex
Subject Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)
Date 2011-02-13 11:04 -0500
Organization Itä-Suomen yliopisto
Message-ID <ij8ve1$ful$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (16 earlier) <ij7e33$ued$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4d573bec$0$23760$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ij7efc$v5p$2@speranza.aioe.org> <4d573f56$0$23764$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ab67b9da-b8d6-4e56-8de5-7ce00ab981fa@t19g2000prd.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


At 10:27 AM, Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> wrote:
> On 13/02/2011 5:50 AM, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arne_Vajh=F8j?=<arne@vajhoej.dk>  writes:
>> 17>  OS/2 was pretty widely used once.
>
> Bullshit.

Smack!

>> [insult deleted]s like Sulfide Eater [false accusation
>> deleted], Arne.
>
> What do your classic erroneous presuppositions have to do  with
> OS/2, tholenbot?

Pow!

>> 18>  OS/2 was used by many large organizations in both the private
>> 18>  and the public sector.
>
> How many is "many"? 3? 6? 10? Maybe even 100? Even 100 adopters
> would have been tiny market share.

Blam!

>> [insult deleted]s like Sulfide Eater [false accusation
>> deleted], Arne.
>
> What do your classic erroneous presuppositions have to do with
> OS/2, tholenator?

Whack!

>> 19>  This was client side - desktop computers.
>
> It wasn't home computers.
>
>> [insult deleted]s like Sulfide Eater [false accusation
>> deleted], Arne.
>
> What do your classic erroneous presuppositions have to do with
> OS/2, thalidomide?

Bam!
Boink!
Slap!

>> 20>  The computers on the employees desktops are client side.
>
> To the employees. Not to anyone back home.

Zoink!

>> 20>  It is a lot more than 3.
>> [insult deleted]s like Sulfide Eater [false accusation
>> deleted], Arne.
>
> What do your classic erroneous presuppositions have to do with
> OS/2, tholenbot?

Kablooie!

I love a good Internet argument. :)

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 00:23 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:03 -0500
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:29 -0800
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-10 09:35 -0500
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:21 -0800
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-10 21:58 +1100
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:23 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-12 05:40 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:28 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 09:32 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-13 11:04 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 07:00 -0500
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 17:02 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-13 11:40 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:43 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:29 -0500
    Re: Troll warning "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 13:52 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-02-09 13:12 +0000
    Re: Troll warning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:22 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:28 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 07:46 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:41 -0800

csiph-web