Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25933

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)

From	Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.os.os2.advocacy, comp.text.tex
Subject	Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)
Date	2011-02-10 09:32 -0500
Organization	Ain't got none sorry
Message-ID	<ij0su9$gbs$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <e26da3e5-4988-4335-b4e3-5ab7a5756ce2@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <iiuvfl$vvv$1@speranza.aioe.org> <4d53c4cd$0$32791$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <ij0k0c$lqe$1@speranza.aioe.org> <6f0a85c5-6a35-4a6c-8acb-23ab5e3b0b2e@m16g2000prc.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/02/2011 9:28 AM, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> 126>  In some niche area. The fact remains that its market share does
> not hold
> 126>  a candle to that of even OS X, let alone Linux or Windows.
>
> Classic pontification.  Of course, Mercedes' market share doesn't hold
> a candle to Chevrolet.

Nor does the market share of the Edsel, trollium.

> The significance of that comparison will undoubtedly be lost on
> someone who can't even keep attributions straight.

Non sequitur; to whom are you referring, tholenator? There is nobody in 
this newsgroup who "can't even keep attributions straight", thingamabob.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 00:23 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:03 -0500
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:29 -0800
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-10 09:35 -0500
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:21 -0800
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-10 21:58 +1100
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:23 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-12 05:40 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:28 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 09:32 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-13 11:04 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 07:00 -0500
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 17:02 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-13 11:40 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:43 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:29 -0500
    Re: Troll warning "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 13:52 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-02-09 13:12 +0000
    Re: Troll warning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:22 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:28 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 07:46 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:41 -0800

csiph-web