Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25769

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)

From	"tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.os.os2.advocacy
Subject	Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)
Followup-To	alt.test
Date	2011-02-09 07:43 -0800
Organization	http://groups.google.com
Message-ID	<3fc75109-966b-4619-bef3-aac6b7917094@z3g2000prz.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <iiqrin$458$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d521cac$0$32796$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <iit7s1$pa2$1@news.albasani.net> <iit8db$m1a$1@speranza.aioe.org> <iiu29i$tu2$1@news.albasani.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.test

Show all headers | View raw

Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> writes:

8> Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy

8> How is still in business and thriving more obscure than historic
only and no
8> longer used?

Classic erroneous presupposition.  OS/2 is still used, Lew.

8> That was essentially what I said to start off this sub-thread:
"Only a couple
8> of OSes really used that stuff back then."  Glad to see agreement
in this
8> often contentious newsgroup.

Are you claiming that OS/2 no longer uses it, Lew?  Or are
you really saying that the 80286 is no longer used?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 00:23 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:03 -0500
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:29 -0800
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-10 09:35 -0500
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:21 -0800
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-10 21:58 +1100
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:23 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-12 05:40 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:28 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 09:32 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-13 11:04 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 07:00 -0500
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 17:02 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-13 11:40 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:43 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:29 -0500
    Re: Troll warning "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 13:52 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-02-09 13:12 +0000
    Re: Troll warning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:22 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:28 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 07:46 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:41 -0800

csiph-web