Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25676

Re: Troll warning

From	Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.os.os2.advocacy, rec.games.roguelike.development
Subject	Re: Troll warning
Date	2011-02-09 17:02 -0500
Organization	Ain't got none sorry
Message-ID	<iiv2t3$8v1$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(13 earlier) <iit8db$m1a$1@speranza.aioe.org> <8rfi5nF6ofU1@mid.individual.net> <iiu4ec$1q1$2@news.albasani.net> <iiv108$3cf$2@speranza.aioe.org> <e4503188-dab3-4913-b00a-165d4b18c9d0@a8g2000pri.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/02/2011 4:52 PM, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> Sulfide Eater<zaxx1108@example.com>  writes:
>
> 122>  Are you claiming, then, that OS/2 is more obscure than QNX?
>
> Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Eater?

Classic erroneous presupposition, tholenbot.

I said that QNX was more obscure than OS/2, tholian. You claimed that 
that was "erroneous", trollen. That implies that you believe that OS/2 
is more obscure than QNX, tholenoid.

> 123>  It's perfectly on topic there, jerkwad. We were dicsussing OS/2's
> 123>  use of the 80286's multitasking support features, which few other
> 123>  operating systems did at the time. If that isn't a useful bit of
> 123>  information for OS/2 advocates I don't know what is. :)
>
> Then why don't you read some of the OS/2 newsgroups to find out
> what sort of questions people ask that represent useful bits of
> information, Eater?

Failure to recognize a common rhetorical question format noted, thallium.

> 124>  It's perfectly on topic there. We were discussing OS/2's use of
> 124>  the 80286's multitasking support features, which few other
> 124>  operating systems did at the time. If that isn't a useful bit
> 124>  of information for OS/2 advocates I don't know what is. :)
>
> Then why don't you read some of the OS/2 newsgroups to find out
> what sort of questions people ask that represent useful bits of
> information, Eater?

Failure to recognize a common rhetorical question format noted, thalidomide

Stuck record behavior also noted, trillium.

> 124>  By the first on-topic traffic they've had in ages?
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

On your part, tholenbot.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 00:23 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:03 -0500
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:29 -0800
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-10 09:35 -0500
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:21 -0800
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-10 21:58 +1100
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:23 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-12 05:40 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:28 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 09:32 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-13 11:04 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 07:00 -0500
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 17:02 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-13 11:40 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:43 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:29 -0500
    Re: Troll warning "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 13:52 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-02-09 13:12 +0000
    Re: Troll warning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:22 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:28 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 07:46 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:41 -0800

csiph-web