Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25492

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)

From	Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.os.os2.advocacy, comp.text.tex
Subject	Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++)
Date	2011-02-09 16:03 -0500
Organization	Ain't got none sorry
Message-ID	<iiuvfl$vvv$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(10 earlier) <iiqrin$458$2@lust.ihug.co.nz> <4d521cac$0$32796$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <iit7s1$pa2$1@news.albasani.net> <iit8db$m1a$1@speranza.aioe.org> <e26da3e5-4988-4335-b4e3-5ab7a5756ce2@i39g2000prd.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/02/2011 10:41 AM, tholen@antispam.ham wrote:
> Sulfide Eater<zaxx1108@example.com>  writes:
>
> 121>  Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer,comp.os.os2.advocacy
>
> 121>  QNX? That's even more obscure than OS/2 is!
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.

Are you claiming, then, that OS/2 is more obscure than QNX?

> 121>  Fact is, nothing with non-micoscopic market share used those
> features of
> 121>  the 80286.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.  OS/2 had far more than a
> microscopic
> market share, Eater.

In your wildest dreams, perhaps, tholenbot.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 00:23 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:03 -0500
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:29 -0800
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-10 09:35 -0500
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:21 -0800
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-10 21:58 +1100
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:23 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-12 05:40 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:28 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 09:32 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-13 11:04 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 07:00 -0500
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 17:02 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:43 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:29 -0500
    Re: Troll warning "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 13:52 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-02-09 13:12 +0000
    Re: Troll warning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:22 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 07:46 -0500

csiph-web