Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25786

Re: Troll warning

From Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer, comp.os.os2.advocacy, rec.games.roguelike.development
Subject Re: Troll warning
Date 2011-02-09 16:29 -0500
Organization Ain't got none sorry
Message-ID <iiv108$3cf$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (11 earlier) <4d521cac$0$32796$c30e37c6@exi-reader.telstra.net> <iit7s1$pa2$1@news.albasani.net> <iit8db$m1a$1@speranza.aioe.org> <8rfi5nF6ofU1@mid.individual.net> <iiu4ec$1q1$2@news.albasani.net>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 09/02/2011 8:22 AM, Lew wrote:
> On 02/09/2011 08:12 AM, Nigel Wade wrote:
>> On 09/02/11 05:23, Sulfide Eater [false accusation deleted]:
>>
>> Watch out for the [insult deleted] in the previous post which was
>> x-posted to an OS/2 advocacy group.

It's perfectly on topic there. We were dicsussing OS/2's use of the 
80286's multitasking support features, which few other operating systems 
did at the time. If that isn't a useful bit of information for OS/2 
advocates I don't know what is. :)

> Damn, and I answered him without noticing! Now both the denizens of the
> OS/2 group will be so bummed out.

By the first on-topic traffic they've had in ages?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 00:23 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:03 -0500
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:29 -0800
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-10 09:35 -0500
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:21 -0800
    Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-02-10 21:58 +1100
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 17:23 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-12 05:40 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-10 06:28 -0800
        Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 09:32 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Heike Svensson <hsvensson.1093x1_q@hotmail.nospam.com.please> - 2011-02-13 11:04 -0500
      Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-10 07:00 -0500
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 17:02 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-13 11:40 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:43 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:29 -0500
    Re: Troll warning "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 13:52 -0800
  Re: Troll warning Nigel Wade <nmw-news@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2011-02-09 13:12 +0000
    Re: Troll warning Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 08:22 -0500
    Re: Troll warning Sulfide Eater <zaxx1108@example.com> - 2011-02-09 16:28 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-09 07:46 -0500
  Re: Intel architecture (Was: Java vs C++) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-02-09 07:41 -0800

csiph-web