Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26138

Re: Why “new”?

Date	2011-02-06 20:20 -0800
From	Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Why “new”?
References	(6 earlier) <iilid3$48g$1@news.eternal-september.org> <p8x3p.20341$g96.17119@newsfe15.iad> <4d4f6434$1@news.x-privat.org> <ILednQuTBIQh-9LQnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d4f6ae3$1@news.x-privat.org>
Message-ID	<Yeydncx9BNqv7tLQnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@earthlink.com> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/6/2011 7:45 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:27:56 +0800, Peter Duniho wrote:
>
>> On 2/7/11 11:17 AM, Ken Wesson wrote:
>>> [...]
>>>> J has arguably helped with that. Some. Fact is, if you apply yourself
>>>> to learning and using J then it's not line-noise at all, it's just
>>>> extremely terse. It's not symbol cruft in the same sense that Perl is.
>>>
>>> And what, pray tell, is J?
>>
>> http://www.lmgtfy.com/
>
> That is needlessly snarky. It's not as if one can google a one-letter
> query and expect a useful result.

The trick is to add some terms to give the single letter some context.
 From the quoted comments, J had to be a programming language, so I tried:

programming language j

The first two Google results were
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J_(programming_language) and www.jsoftware.com/

Patricia

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Why “new”? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-06 09:13 -0400
  Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 22:59 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-02-09 12:55 +0000
  Re: Why “new”? Jerry Gerrone <scuzwalla@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 22:12 -0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 05:42 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 23:07 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 07:39 -0500
      Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 16:14 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:22 +0800
    Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 11:59 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-07 19:18 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:03 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:01 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:33 +0100
      Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:32 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:10 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 04:45 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:17 +0100
      Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 23:05 -0500
      Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 19:49 +0100
      Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:24 +0800
    Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 09:18 +0100
      Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-07 16:38 +0800
    Re: Why “new”? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-02-06 20:20 -0800
  Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-07 11:27 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 04:17 +0100

csiph-web