Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26099

Re: Why “new”?

Date	2011-02-08 20:24 +0800
From	Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Why “new”?
References	(10 earlier) <4d4f6ae3$1@news.x-privat.org> <m8ednZJGneokPtLQnZ2dnUVZ_gOdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d4faac2$1@news.x-privat.org> <cvudnU5knePxMtLQnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d512649@news.x-privat.org>
Message-ID	<j6ednZsSg85zqMzQnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/8/11 7:17 PM, Ken Wesson wrote:
> [...]
> Sure I could have tried mucking about with assorted google queries. I
> just plain didn't feel like it. Satisfied?

Yes.  That's all I wanted: your admission, even absent an apology, that 
you were lazy.  Now, was that so hard?

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-07 15:48 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:30 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 22:58 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Jerry Gerrone <scuzwalla@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 22:12 -0800
  Re: Why “new”? blmblm@myrealbox.com <blmblm@myrealbox.com> - 2011-02-09 15:31 +0000
  Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:10 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:17 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 23:05 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 19:49 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:24 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 09:18 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-07 16:38 +0800

csiph-web