Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25962
| From | Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Why “new”? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | (13 earlier) <cvudnU5knePxMtLQnZ2dnUVZ_rCdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d512649@news.x-privat.org> <j6ednZsSg85zqMzQnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d51600d$1@news.x-privat.org> <W5ydnc3s8Y385czQnZ2dnUVZ_rgAAAAA@posted.palinacquisition> |
| Message-ID | <4d51904e$1@news.x-privat.org> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-02-08 19:49 +0100 |
| Organization | X-Privat.Org NNTP Server - http://www.x-privat.org |
On Wed, 09 Feb 2011 01:07:45 +0800, Peter Duniho wrote: > On 2/8/11 11:23 PM, Ken Wesson wrote: >> On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 20:24:13 +0800, Peter Duniho wrote: >> >>> On 2/8/11 7:17 PM, Ken Wesson wrote: >>>> [...] >>>> Sure I could have tried mucking about with assorted google queries. I >>>> just plain didn't feel like it. Satisfied? >>> >>> Yes. That's all I wanted: your admission, even absent an apology, >>> that you were lazy. >> >> But you didn't get it. I don't agree that it is "lazy" to ask someone >> instead of googling. > > Doesn't really matter whether you agree. You admitted to behavior > anyone else would describe as lazy. No, I admitted to behave many other people would not describe as lazy. Efficient, perhaps. >> What do you usually do if you're talking to someone > > How is that relevant here? If you'd bothered to read on, you'd know. > We are not in a direct, face-to-face > conversation. It's a completely different type of interaction, one in > which it's not only socially acceptable for you to remove yourself from > the discussion momentarily in order to look something up, it's > _expected_. Acceptable, yes. Expected, no, I don't agree. And the burden of task- switching is still there in both cases. >> Furthermore, consider what happens if a number of people read a post >> and, say, wonder what J is. > > You are more than welcome to, instead of _asking_ what J is, follow-up > with a post that _explains_ what J is. No one is stopping you from > that, any more than they are stopping you from asking the ... question > in the first place. I am also welcome to ask the question, since it is a) not too far off- topic here, b) is apropos to a preceding post, c) is not phrased offensively, d) is not answered in the newsgroup's FAQ, and e) being asked in a country that has freedom of speech.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-09 01:07 +0800 Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-09 09:10 +0800 Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 19:49 +0100
csiph-web