Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #26087
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Why “new”? |
| Date | 2011-02-07 19:18 -0500 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <iiq23r$flt$2@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <ILednQuTBIQh-9LQnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> <4d4f6ae3$1@news.x-privat.org> <Yeydncx9BNqv7tLQnZ2dnUVZ_oidnZ2d@earthlink.com> <4d4f7823$1@news.x-privat.org> <4d50885f$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
On 02/07/2011 07:03 PM, Ken Wesson wrote: >> I decided that J had to be some kind of tool, mathematical notation, or >> something the learning of which made APL code more understandable as a >> side-effect; but from the context it was not clear to me whether it was a >> programming language itself, an APL IDE, a species of mathematical >> theory, or any of a number of other things. Arne Vajhøj wrote: > You could have tried all the 3 you list. That would have required reason and effort, and obviated the excuse to troll. -- Lew Ceci n'est pas une fenêtre. .___________. |###] | [###| |##/ | *\##| |#/ * | \#| |#----|----#| || | * || |o * | o| |_____|_____| |===========|
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Why “new”? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-06 09:13 -0400
Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 22:59 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-02-09 12:55 +0000
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 05:42 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 23:07 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 07:39 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 16:14 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:22 +0800
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 11:59 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-07 19:18 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:03 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:01 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:33 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:32 +0800
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 04:45 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-02-06 20:20 -0800
Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-07 11:27 +0800
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 04:17 +0100
csiph-web