Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25858

Re: Why “new”?

From Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Why “new”?
Date 2011-02-08 07:39 -0500
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <iirdha$8e7$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References (12 earlier) <4d4f7823$1@news.x-privat.org> <4d50885f$0$23758$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <iiq23r$flt$2@news.albasani.net> <4d512220@news.x-privat.org> <j6ednZgSg87xqMzQnZ2dnUVZ_smdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition>

Show all headers | View raw


Ken Wesson wrote:
>> There comes a point when finding out what someone meant is easier by
>> simply asking them rather than googling. I find that point tends to come
>> if I'd have to run three or four google queries in a row to get the
>> answer rather than, say, one.

Peter Duniho wrote:
> Really? Incredible!
>
> Google says it resolves a search in around 2/10ths of a second for me. Even
> accounting for network latency, I can get a search done in about 1 second.
> Even accounting for the time it takes to type (let's assume you're awful at
> typing and can manage only 5 words a minute or so, thus making the typing time
> by far the dominant time-consumer in the activity), you ought to be able to
> complete a half-dozen three-word queries in a few minutes.
>
> Is that really so much harder than spending all this time complaining that I
> was "snarky" and trying to defend your laziness?

For him, it is, because he can't troll a Google search.

-- 
Lew
Ceci n'est pas une fenêtre.
.___________.
|###] | [###|
|##/  | *\##|
|#/ * |   \#|
|#----|----#|
||    |  * ||
|o *  |    o|
|_____|_____|
|===========|

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Why “new”? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-06 09:13 -0400
  Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 22:59 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 05:42 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 23:07 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 07:39 -0500
      Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 16:14 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:22 +0800
    Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 11:59 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-07 19:18 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:03 -0500
  Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:01 -0500
    Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:33 +0100
      Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:32 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 04:45 +0100
    Re: Why “new”? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-02-06 20:20 -0800
  Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-07 11:27 +0800
  Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 04:17 +0100

csiph-web