Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #25855
| From | Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Why “new”? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | (5 earlier) <4d4e29fb$1@news.x-privat.org> <iilid3$48g$1@news.eternal-september.org> <p8x3p.20341$g96.17119@newsfe15.iad> <4d4f6434$1@news.x-privat.org> <ILednQuTBIQh-9LQnZ2dnUVZ_omdnZ2d@posted.palinacquisition> |
| Message-ID | <4d4f6ae3$1@news.x-privat.org> (permalink) |
| Date | 2011-02-07 04:45 +0100 |
| Organization | X-Privat.Org NNTP Server - http://www.x-privat.org |
On Mon, 07 Feb 2011 11:27:56 +0800, Peter Duniho wrote: > On 2/7/11 11:17 AM, Ken Wesson wrote: >> [...] >>> J has arguably helped with that. Some. Fact is, if you apply yourself >>> to learning and using J then it's not line-noise at all, it's just >>> extremely terse. It's not symbol cruft in the same sense that Perl is. >> >> And what, pray tell, is J? > > http://www.lmgtfy.com/ That is needlessly snarky. It's not as if one can google a one-letter query and expect a useful result.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Why “new”? Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-02-06 09:13 -0400
Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 22:59 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 05:42 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-08 23:07 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-08 07:39 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 16:14 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:22 +0800
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 11:59 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-02-07 19:18 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:03 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-02-07 19:01 -0500
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-08 12:33 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-08 20:32 +0800
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 04:45 +0100
Re: Why “new”? Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-02-06 20:20 -0800
Re: Why “new”? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-02-07 11:27 +0800
Re: Why “new”? Ken Wesson <kwesson@gmail.com> - 2011-02-07 04:17 +0100
csiph-web