Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8460

Re: Style Police (a rant)

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed101.telia.com!starscream.dk.telia.net!news.tele.dk!feed118.news.tele.dk!dotsrc.org!filter.dotsrc.org!news.dotsrc.org!not-for-mail
Date	Sat, 01 Oct 2011 15:51:07 -0400
From	Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110902 Thunderbird/6.0.2
MIME-Version	1.0
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Style Police (a rant)
References	<j39fdc$1hi$1@dont-email.me> <j3akb0$61g$1@news.albasani.net> <MPG.28d509bfb828d36d9896ad@202.177.16.121> <slrnj6mj4j.6gl.avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> <MPG.28d6c33c1ee98b559896af@202.177.16.121> <44bed345-7302-4fbc-ac46-306c7429a5bc@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <4E6CFF65.4060802@telia.com> <fdff724e-98f3-48e1-901e-c8e1d4ef111f@j19g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <be222faf-4b16-4007-b31d-f81f1b07963a@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <4E6DBD5D.6020604@telia.com> <98ab45c0-2a9e-4f09-8e11-d128d6ebe206@1g2000vbu.googlegroups.com> <d12800ad-543a-46a7-85d8-fbefa0d2b1b8@y6g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <de0e7224-c165-4044-8500-e83020e59021@e9g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <4e866c4c$0$288$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <d66de2e5-eb0c-466f-afca-2930e2458967@k10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To	<d66de2e5-eb0c-466f-afca-2930e2458967@k10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
Lines	32
Message-ID	<4e876f2f$0$293$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink)
Organization	SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source
NNTP-Posting-Host	72.192.23.141
X-Trace	news.sunsite.dk DXC=L_7P[HIg==kCf4eYcI3F5hYSB=nbEKnkkAYIL9Z9\VaoJPe3\kP5EUaKBm9cfh9BSdM2;kT<[:>[aL`ea\CQ6Jdi<g<8ZP0fnJl
X-Complaints-To	staff@sunsite.dk
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:8460

Show key headers only | View raw

On 10/1/2011 10:34 AM, Retahiv Oopsiscame wrote:
> On Sep 30, 9:26 pm, Arne Vajhøj<a...@vajhoej.dk>  wrote:
>> On 9/26/2011 6:17 PM, Retahiv Oopsiscame wrote:
>>> On Sep 23, 1:54 pm, Joe Attardi<jatta...@gmail.com>    wrote:
>>>> On Sep 13, 12:59 am, Retahiv Oopsiscame<roops...@gmail.com>    wrote:
>>
>>>>> None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
>>>>> all true.
>>
>>>> Holy cow! This guy hasn't changed one bit (except a new fake name, I
>>>> see).
>>
>>> Neither have you, it seems. And who's idiot enough to use his real
>>> name on the internet?
>>
>> Most people that behave in way they do not feel ashamed of.
>
> In case you'd forgotten, there's the minor little matter of crazed
> stalkers. It's impossible to please 100% of the people 100% of the
> time and on the net it's damned easy for one of the few disgruntled
> ones to happen to be a complete fucking psycho.
>
>>> Who the hell are you talking about? There's nobody here by that name.
>>
>> Sure is.
>
> I don't see any. Unless you mean that "Jane Doe" freak.

Try the mirror.

Arne

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Style Police (a rant) Joe Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 10:54 -0700
  Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-24 01:54 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-09-24 02:58 -0700
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-24 11:35 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Joe Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 13:50 -0700
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-26 21:14 +0000
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 17:50 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 17:47 -0400
  Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 15:17 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-27 00:50 +0000
      Re: Style Police (a rant) tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2011-09-27 08:55 -0600
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:14 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:11 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:31 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 22:24 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-27 09:30 +0000
        Re: Style Police (a rant) tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2011-09-27 08:57 -0600
          Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:38 -0400
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:36 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-09-30 15:58 +0000
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:32 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-30 21:26 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:34 -0700
        Re: Style Police (a rant) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-01 15:51 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 06:18 -0700
        Re: Style Police (a rant) "Cthun" <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-01 16:26 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-10-01 21:25 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 06:23 -0700
            Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-05 10:01 -0400
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-07 08:29 -0700
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-07 17:34 -0400

csiph-web