Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8465

Re: Style Police (a rant)

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Followups directed to: alt.usenet.kooks

Show all headers | View raw

That first day of 0ctober 2011 saw Paul G D3rbyshire gown gaping as
"roopsisc@gmail.com" and dill bound did palter at his alter in:
Message-ID: 
<d66de2e5-eb0c-466f-afca-2930e2458967 AT k10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com>
>On Sep 30, 9:26pm, Arne Vajhoej <a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
NoNo7ME>On Sep 30, 9:26pm, Arne Vajhoej <a...@vajhoej.dk> wrote:
NoNo7ME>> On 9/26/2011 6:17 PM, Retahiv Oopsiscame wrote:
NoNo7ME>>> On Sep 23, 1:54 pm, Joe Attardi<jatta...@gmail.com> wrote:
NoNo7ME>>>> On Sep 13, 12:59 am, Retahiv Oopsiscame<roops...@gmail.com> wrote:
NoNo7ME>>
NoNo7ME>>>>> None of the nasty things that you have said or implied about me are at
NoNo7ME>>>>> all true.
NoNo7ME>>
NoNo7ME>>>> Holy cow! This guy hasn't changed one bit (except a new fake name, I
NoNo7ME>>>> see).
NoNo7ME>>
NoNo7ME>>> Neither have you, it seems. And who's idiot enough to use his real
NoNo7ME>>> name on the internet?
NoNo7ME>>
NoNo7ME>> Most people that behave in way they do not feel ashamed of.
NoNo7ME>
NoNo7ME>In case you'd forgotten, there's the minor little matter of crazed
NoNo7ME>stalkers. It's impossible to please 100% of the people 100% of the
NoNo7ME>time and on the net it's damned easy for one of the few disgruntled
NoNo7ME>ones to happen to be a complete fucking psycho.




Cross posted to alt.usenet.kooks that you may be among your own, Paul.
Followup-To set to alt.usenet.kooks that you may remain there.




NoNo7ME>
NoNo7ME>>> Who the hell are you talking about? There's nobody here by that name.
NoNo7ME>>
NoNo7ME>> Sure is.
NoNo7ME>I don't see any. Unless you mean that "Jane Doe" freak.



Again, D3rbyshire the Dill, your feigned knowledge on Java is as 
transparent as your non-existent knowledge on news article headers.

Well known is this series of posts, the cloak removed by Arne,  one
who has you lime green with envy.




++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:52:33 -0500
From: Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Message-ID: <49223bfe$0$90264$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>

	Credibility: zero

	Internet usage skills: zero

--------------------------------------------------------------
Arne's comments refer to the not so smart attempted "con" D3rbyshire
pulled on <cljp> and <cll> for some months in 2008. The 'thread' then
generated by D3rbyshire I include excerpts of, below.
The full thread is here:
http://preview.tinyurl.com/D3rbyshire0utsHimself
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.java.programmer/browse_thread/thread/d7d67d116bd9c2e8/90b1ba4e63328fc4?q=
--------------------------------------------------------------


pgderb@gmail.com
74.14.135.55
16 Nov 2008
	Oh, for Christ's sake. 
	I've known about this nonsense for a while but I ignored it until now. 
	Now I've decided it's gotten out of hand.
	I am probably the Paul D3rbyshire everyone here keeps talking about,

hzergel901@gmail.com
74.14.135.55
17 Nov 2008
	* I'm not the one talking to imaginary friends in public, and then
	having a public falling-out with one of them!

scuzwalla@gmail.com
74.14.135.55
17 Nov 2008
	So, he really DOES exist.

IP 	:	74.14.135.55 	     Neighborhood
Host 	:	bas1-ottawa10-1242466103.dsl.bell.ca    OK
Country 	:	Canada

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++





Telling folks you are not you, pumping whole threads with your 
puppets, is what earned you your KOTM and TInf0il Sombrero 
"tar and feather" double act, D3rbyshire the Dill. 
Your "porkie pies" around Usenet are now legendary but let 
us look at one effort you make to impress weBLog users at your 
favorite site, one you visit and post to daily.

Here is an excerpt from just one recent rant. A rant delivered after 
your being exposed on that site, it seems. This is a very familiar 
reaction of yours, well documented, but let's get on and deliver 
the Lie, Paul.

               http://mushroomobserver.org/comment/show_comment?_js=on&_new=true&id=38444&q=6zKJ
                "I don’t agree that I’ve done anything to invite reprehensible 
                 responses. (And as for the Usenet community, I haven’t 
                 touched Usenet in years  too much heat and too little 
                 light for my tastes. 


Now do froth on with me being you being not Paul being you when 
I am being you and am definitely not Paul who is you.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Style Police (a rant) Joe Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 10:54 -0700
  Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-24 01:54 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-09-24 02:58 -0700
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-24 11:35 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Joe Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 13:50 -0700
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-26 21:14 +0000
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 17:50 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 17:47 -0400
  Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 15:17 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-27 00:50 +0000
      Re: Style Police (a rant) tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2011-09-27 08:55 -0600
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:14 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:11 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:31 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 22:24 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-27 09:30 +0000
        Re: Style Police (a rant) tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2011-09-27 08:57 -0600
          Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:38 -0400
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:36 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-09-30 15:58 +0000
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:32 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-30 21:26 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:34 -0700
        Re: Style Police (a rant) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-01 15:51 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 06:18 -0700
        Re: Style Police (a rant) "Cthun" <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-01 16:26 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-10-01 21:25 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 06:23 -0700
            Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-05 10:01 -0400
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-07 08:29 -0700
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-07 17:34 -0400

csiph-web