Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8643

Re: Style Police (a rant)

From	Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject	Re: Style Police (a rant)
Date	2011-10-07 17:34 -0400
Organization	Ph'nglui mglw'nfah Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn
Message-ID	<j6nr9t$jup$2@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <d66de2e5-eb0c-466f-afca-2930e2458967@k10g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <j67lfx$bef$1@speranza.aioe.org> <e096b22c-dcb2-4696-ac9e-ed2f4d4a402e@d26g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <j6hnvu$ms7$3@speranza.aioe.org> <2b89a73d-86b3-4753-ae9d-88d77300d5fd@dm9g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 07/10/2011 11:29 AM, Retahiv Oopsiscame wrote:
> On Oct 5, 10:01 am, Cthun<cthun_...@qmail.net.au>  wrote:
>> On 05/10/2011 9:23 AM, Retahiv Oopsiscame wrote:
>>> Well, obviously you've gone directly off the deep end. First that Lisp
>>> supremacist nonsense and now this completely unreadable babble.
>>
>> That post was a forgery, from a net.stalker I seem to have collected in
>> recent months.
>
> Perhaps so. It certainly didn't look like any of your other posts, and
> googling some of the stranger neologisms and turns of phrase in it
> reveals other posts that seem very similar, but have different from
> addresses. Nymshifting troll?

Of course.

>> Don't worry, my nuttiness doesn't extend beyond preferring Lisp to Java. ;)
>
> Ah, good. Admitting you have a problem is always the first step.

I don't think my love of Lisp *is* a problem, thank you very much. :P

>> I suggest you killfile the stalker. He has one of his own, namely
>> thoolen, who seems to rapidly tear the stuffing out of every wacky thing
>> he posts. I let him clean up the mess.
>
> If by "tear the stuffing out of" you mean "mostly ask a lot of
> repetitive questions mildly implying that the stalker's post is off-
> topic here", then I suppose you're right.

Read some of the sections of his posts that contain the word "ironic". 
There are some classic insults and pokings of holes in hypocrisy to be 
found there.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Style Police (a rant) Joe Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com> - 2011-09-23 10:54 -0700
  Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-24 01:54 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) "tholen@antispam.ham" <tholen@ifa.hawaii.edu> - 2011-09-24 02:58 -0700
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-24 11:35 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Joe Attardi <jattardi@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 13:50 -0700
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-26 21:14 +0000
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 17:50 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 17:47 -0400
  Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 15:17 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-27 00:50 +0000
      Re: Style Police (a rant) tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2011-09-27 08:55 -0600
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:14 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:11 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:31 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-26 22:24 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Jane Doe <jdoe@love.in.d.jungle.invalid> - 2011-09-27 09:30 +0000
        Re: Style Police (a rant) tisue@cs.nwu.edu (Seth Tisue) - 2011-09-27 08:57 -0600
          Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:38 -0400
        Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-09-27 14:36 -0400
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-09-30 15:58 +0000
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:32 -0700
    Re: Style Police (a rant) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-09-30 21:26 -0400
      Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 07:34 -0700
        Re: Style Police (a rant) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-10-01 15:51 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 06:18 -0700
        Re: Style Police (a rant) "Cthun" <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-01 16:26 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) thoolen <th00len@th0lenbot.thorium> - 2011-10-01 21:25 -0400
          Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-05 06:23 -0700
            Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-05 10:01 -0400
              Re: Style Police (a rant) Retahiv Oopsiscame <roopsisc@gmail.com> - 2011-10-07 08:29 -0700
                Re: Style Police (a rant) Cthun <cthun_117@qmail.net.au> - 2011-10-07 17:34 -0400

csiph-web