Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22629
| From | Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: The current object |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| References | (9 earlier) <kmm6b0$9bd$1@online.de> <518f7fbb$0$32105$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <kmrrtk$8nm$1@online.de> <_Lmdnbce8uElYQzMnZ2dnUVZ_sidnZ2d@supernews.com> <2013May14.165102@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
| Message-ID | <rtWdnXsnF-Vy1g7MnZ2dnUVZ_uWdnZ2d@supernews.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2013-05-15 03:48 -0500 |
Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote: > Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> writes: >>Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> wrote: >>> Note that this doesn't really work. For the user of an object, it's >>> a black box (you can't access the ivars directly), but for derived >>> classes, it's a "grey box" - you *can* access the ivars. > > That's what e.g., objects.fs does, but there is no general way to get > that kind of visibility in Java. > >>IMO this is wrong -- it breaks encapsulation. A subclass shouldn't >>access ivars any more than any other class. (But, of course, I am not >>saying that a mechanism should prevent it, just that there's nothing >>special about subclasses.) > > That's a question of design. Indeed. :-) > My collegue who is more into OO than I am tells me that inheritance is > overrated; according to him, for long-lived programs that see quite a > bit of change, inheritance is mostly eliminated over time, Hmm. I certainly haven't noticed that. Inheritance is partly eliminated over time, I can accept. > and what remains is the substitution principle. In that kind of > world, yes, a subclass probably should not access the instance > variables of its superclass, and you probably should not be using a > subclass at all. Why not? The substitution principle applies well to subclasses. > However, if we are less intent on keeping changes local and avoiding > rewrites, inheritance may be a way to keep code tighter, and > accessing instance variables inherited from the parent class(es) may > help with that goal, too. I'm not sure about that: the overhead (to the programmer) of creating accessors doesn't have to be great and serves as a notice to the reader of a class. > If it took from 1967 (Simula-67) to 1994 to find the substitution > principle, It did not take until 1994 to find the substitution principle. Liskov herself talked about it in 1987. People using OO for work knew it all along, if perhaps only subconsciously. > and if people still do not follow it when they do OO design, maybe > the disadvantages of not following it are not so bad. Some do, some don't. Andrew.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-02 02:12 +0200
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 04:52 -0400
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-02 04:31 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-02 18:25 +0200
Re: The current object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-02 16:58 +0000
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-02 22:26 +0200
Re: The current object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-06 14:52 +0000
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-07 03:47 +0200
Re: The current object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-07 15:22 +0000
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-02 12:12 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-02 21:56 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-03 03:19 -0500
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 06:54 -0400
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-02 14:28 +0000
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-02 19:58 +0200
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-03 16:50 +0000
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-04 18:58 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-04 13:35 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-05 01:08 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-04 18:29 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-05 03:00 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-05 03:48 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-05 23:15 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-06 05:01 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-07 03:23 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-07 03:39 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-07 19:00 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-07 13:34 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-07 22:00 +0200
Re: The current object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-08 07:26 +0000
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 06:39 -0400
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-05 09:15 -0500
Re: The current object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-05 09:25 -0700
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-05 11:43 -0500
Re: The current object Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-05 09:59 -0700
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-06 05:06 -0500
Re: The current object Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 00:19 -0700
Re: The current object "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-13 22:45 +0000
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 06:39 -0400
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-05 23:40 +0200
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 06:39 -0400
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-05 23:29 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-06 05:10 -0500
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 07:35 -0400
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-09 00:06 +0200
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-09 06:41 -0400
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-11 21:31 +0200
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 07:40 -0400
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-14 01:10 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-14 03:58 -0500
Re: The current object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-14 14:51 +0000
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-15 03:48 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-14 18:37 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-14 14:42 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-15 00:22 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-15 02:56 -0500
Re: The current object stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-05-15 13:52 +0000
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-15 17:58 +0200
Re: The current object albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-17 14:01 +0000
Re: The current object johno <email@address.com> - 2013-05-15 22:38 +0100
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 06:27 -0400
Re: The current object albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-09 16:06 +0000
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-06 16:12 +0000
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-05-06 10:25 -0700
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-07 04:00 +0200
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-07 15:02 +0000
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-07 04:09 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-07 03:41 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-07 19:02 +0200
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-07 14:33 +0000
Re: The current object (was: Went open source with my GA144 ...) Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-07 19:40 +0200
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-15 16:46 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-15 13:11 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-15 23:23 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-16 02:24 -0500
Re: The current object anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-16 13:55 +0000
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-16 17:45 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-18 05:13 -0500
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 06:43 -0400
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-18 10:03 -0500
Re: The current object Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-05-18 11:30 -0400
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 01:20 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-19 12:33 -0500
Re: The current object Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 01:07 +0200
Re: The current object Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-19 03:58 -0500
OO dispatch (was: The current object) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-16 14:07 +0000
Re: OO dispatch Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-18 05:28 -0500
Re: OO dispatch anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-20 11:28 +0000
Re: OO dispatch Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-20 09:00 -0500
Re: OO dispatch Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-21 01:37 +0200
Re: OO dispatch Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-21 03:21 -0500
Re: OO dispatch anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-21 12:24 +0000
Re: OO dispatch Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-21 10:18 -0500
Re: OO dispatch anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-05-21 16:03 +0000
Re: OO dispatch Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-21 12:55 -0500
Re: OO dispatch Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-29 00:00 +0200
Re: OO dispatch Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-05-28 15:49 -0700
csiph-web