Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22527
| From | rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? |
| Date | 2013-05-12 00:35 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kmn5vd$efg$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <7xehdhespt.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <kmmo8i$s75$1@dont-email.me> <7xd2sxj9i3.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <kmmr7j$831$1@dont-email.me> <7x7gj5q6wm.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> |
On 5/11/2013 10:16 PM, Paul Rubin wrote: > rickman<gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: >> I know what a BeagleBone is, I'm asking why that board? It is not as >> cheap as the rPi and is quite power hungry compares to real MCUs. > > The price difference vs. the rpi is negligible and it's a more powerful > board with a more open design. I thought the BB was $90 vs. $35 for the rPi. I see below the Black is shipping now, so yeah, $45 is not much different from the pi. >> Is this for something where you need the features like video... no, >> BeagleBone doesn't have video yet unless you add a piggyback board. >> Or is the BB Black out already? > > Yes, it's a BB Black and it has video. It was out of stock at Digikey > when I ordered it, but they shipped it a few days later. The video > doesn't matter much to me anyway, as it has ethernet. > >> for much embedded work I think an OS like Linux is just a bit too much. > > Shrug, I can agree that for some small stuff, the OS may get in the way, > require hardware that costs too much, be too non-deterministic for > real-time control, or whatever. Other times, it can make your job > easier, and a lot of the cost advantage of MCU stuff has now dissipated. > So you may as well use something like the Beaglebone even if you could > (with more headaches) get by without it. You see embedded as a headache, I see it as simple. I don't know Linux and see products like the pi and BB as needlessly complex. The other issue is the power consumption. Just like my cell phone runs for a week on a charge and my friend's iPhone has trouble getting through the day, a BB or pi will take a lot more power than even an ARM CM3. If I need the power of a GHz processor, then by all means I would use a pi or BB. Oh yeah, is the BB still only supported through that Google Group? When GG "upgraded" their UI I gave up on it. I would hate to have to go there for support. I remember the group maintainer grousing about how Google switched that group to the new interface with no path back to the old UI even though they hadn't done that with all the other groups. What the heck is with Google sometimes anyway? -- Rick
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-30 16:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-05-01 11:27 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 11:27 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-05-01 18:08 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 10:41 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 11:13 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 23:39 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-01 10:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 23:19 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-01 20:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 00:29 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-02 08:15 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-02 14:34 -0500
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 23:54 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-03 03:22 -0500
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 15:45 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-03 08:29 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:08 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-03 17:19 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 19:34 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-03 19:18 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-04 12:27 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2013-05-04 14:50 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 20:31 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 01:13 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 01:23 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:14 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:40 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 01:52 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-07 18:54 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 21:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 01:00 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-07 22:35 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:17 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-11 20:07 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 18:02 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-11 21:31 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 19:16 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 00:35 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-11 18:49 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 22:35 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-12 12:54 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 10:30 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 03:25 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 03:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-07 22:06 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:23 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:36 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 01:55 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 00:32 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:29 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Marc Olschok <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-05-07 16:25 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-05-08 02:06 +0200
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 21:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-07 19:26 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 22:46 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-12 01:20 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:20 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:43 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 02:03 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 07:53 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 09:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 11:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:22 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:17 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-03 19:03 -0700
csiph-web