Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22518
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? |
| Date | 2013-05-11 18:02 -0700 |
| Organization | Nightsong/Fort GNOX |
| Message-ID | <7xd2sxj9i3.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <3626f18d-3ffb-42f0-bced-193337ae822c@pl9g2000pbb.googlegroups.com> <9a8ad873-ad94-4d52-8257-1c59a9a79786@w13g2000vbn.googlegroups.com> <w7edna-mBpbKkxfMnZ2dnUVZ_vudnZ2d@supernews.com> <7xehdhespt.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <kmmo8i$s75$1@dont-email.me> |
rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> writes: > I can assure you that many devices still contain four bit CPUs without > being in an ASIC. 8 bitters are alive and very well. If you are > counting pennies, the smaller CPUs will have the advantage At some point the cost of a circuit delivered as an IC gets dominated by the cost of the packaging and assembly rather than the silicon. That's why we don't see many 7400 quad NAND gate chips any more, or for that matter any 8-bit CPU's (e.g. like the 6502) as opposed to SOC's where the CPU, some ram, program memory, ADC/DAC's etc. are all right there on the die. If the least you can end up paying for a packaged part is (say) 25 cents, it follows that the part will end up doing more and more, thus the idea of 32-bit replacing 8-bit. I don't think it's happening on a big scale just yet, but I do believe there are some 50 cent Cortex M0+ parts. >> I just got a Beaglebone Black > Why a Beaglebone as opposed to a lower cost CPU board? It's the same idea as a Raspberry Pi, a fairly cheap ($45) but quite powerful board with a lot of stuff that you can plug into a computer or monitor and program like a PC. I guess there are some other boards that cost a little less, so if I were buying high quantities I'd check into them. There are also boards like the STM Discovery or TI Launchpad which cost a lot less but are much less powerful. They are of interest as Forth targets but I bought the Beaglebone for somewhat different purposes. I may end up actually using the Beaglebone as a file server. > That is not in conflict with bottom up coding and test. Here's a post advocating the ultimate in top down: ship the product before even starting to code. http://viniciusvacanti.com/2013/05/07/the-manual-first-startup/
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-30 16:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-05-01 11:27 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 11:27 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-05-01 18:08 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 10:41 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 11:13 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 23:39 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-01 10:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 23:19 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-01 20:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 00:29 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-02 08:15 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-02 14:34 -0500
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 23:54 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-03 03:22 -0500
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 15:45 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-03 08:29 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:08 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-03 17:19 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 19:34 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-03 19:18 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-04 12:27 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2013-05-04 14:50 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 20:31 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 01:13 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 01:23 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:14 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:40 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 01:52 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-07 18:54 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 21:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 01:00 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-07 22:35 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:17 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-11 20:07 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 18:02 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-11 21:31 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 19:16 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 00:35 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-11 18:49 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 22:35 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-12 12:54 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 10:30 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 03:25 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 03:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-07 22:06 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:23 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:36 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 01:55 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 00:32 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:29 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Marc Olschok <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-05-07 16:25 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-05-08 02:06 +0200
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 21:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-07 19:26 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 22:46 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-12 01:20 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:20 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:43 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 02:03 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 07:53 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 09:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 11:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:22 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:17 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-03 19:03 -0700
csiph-web