Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22424
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-05-08 00:32 -0700 |
| References | (1 earlier) <km19dr$fqb$1@speranza.aioe.org> <2e7234ca-2c50-4639-bacb-5bb75a07f471@googlegroups.com> <km1hch$84t$1@dont-email.me> <364c8fc6-5374-4c83-ab59-66e3f3c109cd@googlegroups.com> <kmc0gs$7sr$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| Message-ID | <2dfc8f97-e0d2-4f45-a2f4-17e1b2318d63@dl10g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? |
| From | Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> |
>If an >application is coded in a fast implementation of Forth, instead of >using C or C++, no one will notice or care that it was coded in >Forth. If no one notices or cares, what advantage does Forth have >over non-Forth? None. Exactly. Well said. Forth is not fairy dust that, when sprinkled over an application (or a type of application) magically makes it better. It's just a programming language. I happen to like it as a programming language, but it's JUST a language. There's nothing that can *only* be done in Forth. And probably nothing that is *better* in Forth than other languages. It's just a tool in your toolbox. It's nothing more than spanner or a hammer. It just gets a job done. In some circumstances it excels (low-level embedded) - like using a small rubber hammer on a delicate work-piece rather than a mallet), in other cases, it's not so good (you wouldn't use a small rubber hammer to knock a wall down). Apparantly, Java runs in all BluRay DVD players. Do I care? Would I care if it was replaced with some other languge? Of course not. Java was probably selected because it's massive class-space covers a *lot* of ground. There's classes in there for most everything you would want to do (implelented by others, either in Java or some other language). It's a massive (and rather inefficient) swiss-army knife. If it were a real swiss-army knife, it would be really heavy and uncomfortable in your pocket, and reaching for the right blade/implement would be awkward, and it would feel awkward in your hand while you were using it, but it would get the job done, and would save you from having to carry around a large toolbox. Where would you even *start* with an E-commerce system in Forth. Where is your: * Dynamic memory allocation/de-allocation * TCP/IP * HTTPS * Message queues * Atomic transactions Using Forth for e-commerce would be like turning up for an apartment block demolition with a hammer.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-30 16:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-05-01 11:27 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 11:27 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-05-01 18:08 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 10:41 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 11:13 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 23:39 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-01 10:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-01 23:19 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-01 20:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 00:29 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-02 08:15 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-02 14:34 -0500
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-02 23:54 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-03 03:22 -0500
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 15:45 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-03 08:29 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:08 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-03 17:19 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 16:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-03 19:34 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-03 19:18 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-04 12:27 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2013-05-04 14:50 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-05 20:31 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 01:13 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-06 01:23 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:14 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:40 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 01:52 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-05-07 18:54 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 21:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 01:00 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-07 22:35 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-08 02:17 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-11 20:07 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 18:02 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-11 21:31 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 19:16 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 00:35 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-11 18:49 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-11 22:35 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-05-12 12:54 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 10:30 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 03:25 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 03:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-07 22:06 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:23 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:36 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 01:55 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Mark Wills <forthfreak@gmail.com> - 2013-05-08 00:32 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:29 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Marc Olschok <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-05-07 16:25 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-05-08 02:06 +0200
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 21:21 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-07 19:26 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-07 22:46 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-12 01:20 +0000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:20 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:43 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-05-13 02:03 -0400
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 07:53 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 09:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) Steve <nospam275@gmail.com> - 2013-05-14 11:07 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser (and an universal thingilator, better than C# , javascript, Limbo and COBOL rolled into one?) gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:22 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? gavino_himself <visploveslisp@gmail.com> - 2013-05-12 13:17 -0700
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-05-12 12:46 -1000
Re: when forth pc with a firefox liek browser? Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2013-05-03 19:03 -0700
csiph-web