Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #20883
| From | "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? |
| Date | 2013-03-20 13:58 +1100 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <kib8ju$b83$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnkki5ta.pvu.zbigniew2011REMOVE@Tichy.myhome.org> <kib2om$6bk$1@online.de> |
Bernd Paysan wrote: > Zbiggy wrote: > > > I took a closer look at "Filer" example from "Starting Forth" - it makes > > direct use out of parameter fields by using >BODY > > ( http://www.forth.com/starting-forth/sf12/filer.forth ). > > > > I compared the results returned by >BODY on a few different Forth > > implementations, and it seems, that I can't expect any consistency. On two > > of them - I mean FPC and CH-Forth - the returned address, then examined > > with DUMP, didn't show anything (at first glance) particularly meaningful. > > The others vary: some encoded strings as C-string, but - for example - > > Gforth doesn't seem to keep string this way in parameter field area. > > You can use >BODY for words defined with CREATE (and maybe DOES>), and find > what you have put there yourself. > > If you use >BODY on colon definitions, you won't get anything consistent. Yes, >BODY is only guaranteed for CREATEd words. As much as I dislike words that handle multiple datatypes (e.g. TO) I can see the equivalent for >BODY becoming necessary. Used to access the data field of an object, it goes under names such as ADDR &OF etc.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-20 01:03 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-20 02:18 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-20 13:58 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-03-19 23:59 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-21 23:17 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-21 07:27 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Sieur de Bienville <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-03-21 07:01 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-21 09:14 -0500
DEFER@ (was: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all?) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-21 17:31 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Sieur de Bienville <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-03-22 14:30 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-23 05:34 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-03-25 09:44 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-22 01:30 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-21 08:17 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-22 12:14 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-22 03:33 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-21 15:15 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-22 00:24 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-22 11:49 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-22 04:22 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-22 22:38 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-23 21:37 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-23 05:06 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-23 13:18 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-24 00:17 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-23 15:10 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-24 01:25 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-26 12:55 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-26 05:51 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-28 23:31 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-03-28 12:57 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-28 08:15 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-30 12:56 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-30 04:56 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-30 10:32 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-04-04 12:36 +1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-28 17:39 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-28 21:32 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-28 11:58 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-29 00:59 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-28 08:41 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-30 12:43 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-27 17:15 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-27 22:04 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-28 12:17 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-26 13:13 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-24 01:21 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-03-20 00:01 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-19 22:02 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-20 05:27 -0400
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-20 10:27 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-03-20 03:23 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-20 17:22 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-20 07:52 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-03-20 18:56 +0000
OT: SF-translations Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-20 21:44 +0000
Re: OT: SF-translations Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-20 23:12 +0100
Re: OT: SF-translations Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-20 22:45 +0000
Re: OT: SF-translations Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-21 15:50 +0100
Re: OT: SF-translations "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-20 12:38 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-21 05:52 -0400
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-21 10:08 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-21 08:17 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-21 18:46 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2013-03-21 20:20 +0200
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-03-22 08:41 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-03-22 09:03 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-22 08:05 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-22 22:17 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-23 12:07 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-24 01:40 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-24 03:55 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-03-24 12:18 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-24 06:04 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-24 15:31 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-23 02:26 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-22 17:39 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-20 19:18 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-21 16:18 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-22 00:34 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-21 23:54 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-22 00:54 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-21 14:37 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-20 04:48 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-21 05:43 -0400
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-21 08:30 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-22 03:31 -0400
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-21 22:07 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-22 03:37 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-20 17:14 +0000
csiph-web