Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #21046
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-03-22 08:41 -0700 |
| References | <FqWdnXsu68Ik09bMnZ2dnUVZ_s2dnZ2d@supernews.com> <02151514008434@frunobulax.edu> |
| Message-ID | <e6bb27ec-b69b-44e0-86f6-806eaaa1bf4a@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? |
| From | Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> |
On Thursday, March 21, 2013 11:20:01 AM UTC-7, Marcel Hendrix wrote: > "Elizabeth D. Rather" writes Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? > > [..] > > > In my experience there is virtually no demand for >BODY. The cases I've > > seen of its use could usually have been managed more effectively using a > > different data object or access code. > > It seems I got some improving to do:-) > SwiftForth i386-Win32 3.4.3 23-Jun-2012 wh >body WORDLIST: FORTH C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\kernel\dictionary.f 9__83| ICODE >BODY ( xt -- n ) 9_137| : N>BODY ( nfa -- body ) NAME> >BODY ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\kernel\win32\imports.f 13_115| @+ R@ + @ ['] ExitProcess >BODY ! 13_116| @+ R@ + @ ['] LoadLibrary >BODY ! 13_117| @+ R@ + @ ['] GetProcAddress >BODY ! 13_118| @+ R@ + @ ['] GetModuleHandle >BODY ! 13_119| @ R> + @ ['] MessageBox >BODY ! ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\kernel\interp.f 23_300| LAST @ NAME> >BODY - C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\kernel\files.f 25_125| @REL DUP WHILE DUP LINK> >BODY @ R@ = IF ( match) C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\kernel\defining.f 27_141| : >BODY! ( n xt -- ) >BODY ! ; 27_142| : >BODY+! ( n xt -- ) >BODY +! ; 27_169| STATE @ IF POSTPONE LITERAL POSTPONE >BODY EXIT THEN >BODY ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\kernel\switch.f 29__92| ' >BODY 7777 SWAP ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\kernel\start.f 34_100| | : ?ED ( -- flag ) ['] EDIT-START >BODY @ 0<> ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\errmessages.f 37_110| ['] (THROW) >BODY >LINK OVER , , ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\encapsulate.f 38__55| DUP >BODY CELL+ CELL+ @ ['] WORDLIST <> IOR_PACKAGENOT ?THROW 38__56| >BODY CELL+ @ OPEN-PACKAGE EXIT C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\patterns.f 43_1067| LASTLIT @ LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ LASTLIT 2! 43_1079| LASTLIT @ LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ LASTLIT 2! 43_1089| LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] EBX LEA 43_1096| LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] EBX MOV 43_1102| EBX LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] MOV 43_1109| LASTLIT @ # LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] MOV 43_1118| EBX LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] MOV 43_1127| LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] EBX 0 RULEX 43_1139| LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] PUSH 43_1143| LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] POP 43_1154| 0 # LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] CMP 43_1161| 0 # LASTCHILD @ >BODY @ [ESI] CMP 43_1346| OPTIMIZE (LITERAL) >BODY WITH LIT->BODY C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\aswoop.f 49_210| CREATE DUP CELLS , 1+ DOES> @ SWAP >BODY + ; 49_330| @ 'FLAVOR @ >BODY + ; 49_1006| >BODY 2 CELLS + @+ SIZEOF >R ( n 'n) 49_1154| THIS POSTPONE LITERAL POSTPONE >BODY 49_1155| THIS >BODY - CELL+ POSTPONE LITERAL POSTPONE + END-REFERENCE ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\locate.f 56__32| DUP LINK> >BODY @ THIRD = IF ( match) 56__47| DUP LINK> >BODY @ 4 H.0 SPACE C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\win32\imports.f 62_128| DROP >BODY @ 0<> ; \ true if there's a handle 62_132| >BODY @ FreeLibrary DROP ; \ Get handle, close it 62_152| >BODY 'LIB !REL 2DROP EXIT THEN 62_243| CR DUP NAME> >BODY @+ 8 H.R SPACE SPACE C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\win32\winconstants.f 63__53| ['] FindWin32Constant >BODY @ 0= ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\win32\options.f 114__54| CR DUP H.8 SPACE DUP COUNT BRIGHT TYPE NORMAL SPACE NAME> >BODY COUNT TYPE ; C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\win32\memtools.f 122_118| DUP (.') NAME> >BODY = 122_475| ['] DMPLINE >BODY @ CASE 122_483| ['] DMPLINE >BODY @ CASE C:\ForthInc\SwiftForth\src\ide\win32\wordbrowser.f 123_225| HWND _VOCS CB_SETITEMDATA R> R> NAME> >BODY CELL+ @ 123_230| ['] .ID >BODY @ >R ok
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-20 01:03 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-20 02:18 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-20 13:58 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-03-19 23:59 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-21 23:17 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-21 07:27 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Sieur de Bienville <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-03-21 07:01 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-21 09:14 -0500
DEFER@ (was: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all?) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-21 17:31 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Sieur de Bienville <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-03-22 14:30 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-23 05:34 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-03-25 09:44 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-22 01:30 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-21 08:17 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-22 12:14 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-22 03:33 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-21 15:15 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-22 00:24 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-22 11:49 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-22 04:22 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-22 22:38 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-23 21:37 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-23 05:06 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-23 13:18 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-24 00:17 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-23 15:10 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-24 01:25 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-26 12:55 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-26 05:51 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-28 23:31 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-03-28 12:57 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-28 08:15 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-30 12:56 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-30 04:56 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-30 10:32 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-04-04 12:36 +1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-28 17:39 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-28 21:32 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-28 11:58 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-29 00:59 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-28 08:41 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-30 12:43 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-27 17:15 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-27 22:04 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-28 12:17 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Ed" <invalid@nospam.com> - 2013-03-26 13:13 +1100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-24 01:21 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-03-20 00:01 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-19 22:02 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-20 05:27 -0400
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-20 10:27 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-03-20 03:23 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-20 17:22 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-20 07:52 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Gerry Jackson <gerry@jackson9000.fsnet.co.uk> - 2013-03-20 18:56 +0000
OT: SF-translations Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-20 21:44 +0000
Re: OT: SF-translations Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-20 23:12 +0100
Re: OT: SF-translations Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-20 22:45 +0000
Re: OT: SF-translations Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-21 15:50 +0100
Re: OT: SF-translations "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-20 12:38 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-21 05:52 -0400
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-21 10:08 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-21 08:17 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-21 18:46 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2013-03-21 20:20 +0200
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-03-22 08:41 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-03-22 09:03 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-22 08:05 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-22 22:17 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-03-23 12:07 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-24 01:40 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-03-24 03:55 -0500
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-03-24 12:18 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-24 06:04 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-03-24 15:31 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-23 02:26 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-22 17:39 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-20 19:18 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-21 16:18 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-22 00:34 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Zbiggy <zbigniew2011REMOVE@gmail.REMOVE.com> - 2013-03-21 23:54 +0000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-03-22 00:54 +0100
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-21 14:37 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-20 04:48 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-21 05:43 -0400
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-21 08:30 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-22 03:31 -0400
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-03-21 22:07 -1000
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-03-22 03:37 -0700
Re: Can i rely on >BODY for anything at all? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-03-20 17:14 +0000
csiph-web