Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine?

X-Received	by 10.224.129.196 with SMTP id p4mr10868633qas.6.1372998651334; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 21:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received	by 10.49.101.78 with SMTP id fe14mr192653qeb.13.1372998651310; Thu, 04 Jul 2013 21:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!t19no409573qam.0!news-out.google.com!f7ni1003qai.0!nntp.google.com!t19no427356qam.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Date	Thu, 4 Jul 2013 21:30:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<1d68e6bc-f11c-4bd8-a907-fc819f0d4373@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.134.221.155; posting-account=hP9USgoAAADyPwMdR5qi1rinwP694_5o
NNTP-Posting-Host	64.134.221.155
References	<a90e9108-640c-4d83-ad22-b21462a47668@googlegroups.com> <kqfijd$psr$1@dont-email.me> <081807f8-b3d5-4e75-b676-f9757e0c9c65@googlegroups.com> <376a4ebb-bbff-457b-bf57-2743d71a7ef7@googlegroups.com> <cd33ec39-8b4a-463a-aafc-79b4dd537837@googlegroups.com> <ca1d7051-ffc3-4b38-a646-ebda3c7ae4eb@googlegroups.com> <kqq58c$teu$1@dont-email.me> <d3515fe4-5421-47f3-b590-bff7e4d9584c@googlegroups.com> <18f27274-dc2c-4cda-95e7-a3526b319786@googlegroups.com> <bde62eee-6e01-422c-b2c6-104080ee6855@googlegroups.com> <1d68e6bc-f11c-4bd8-a907-fc819f0d4373@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Message-ID	<ef461c0a-4955-4104-a17c-2f669ebfccfa@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine?
From	hughaguilar96@yahoo.com
Injection-Date	Fri, 05 Jul 2013 04:30:51 +0000
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding	quoted-printable
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.forth:24166

Show key headers only | View raw

On Thursday, July 4, 2013 2:58:19 AM UTC-7, Alex McDonald wrote:
> On Thursday, 4 July 2013 02:41:28 UTC+1, hughag...@yahoo.com  wrote:
> Heapsort and a linked list merge sort differ in that heapsort is unstable, and it requires auxiliary space. So much for "theoretically the same". You mean that they are both worst case O(n log n); that's not the only criteria for categorising or selecting a sort.

HeapSort doesn't require auxiliary memory.

The reason why I use HeapSort rather than QuickSort, is because HeapSort is more consistent in how much time it takes, whereas QuickSort varies a lot depending upon how well-ordered the original data is. This is important for micro-controllers, where consistency is hugely important (although the novice package isn't for micro-controllers, so that doesn't apply there).

QuickSort is so simple that it is easy to memorize. In a job interview, if they want me to write a sort program on the blackboard, I'll go with QuickSort for this reason --- I can't remember how to implement HeapSort without looking it up, although HeapSort is what I actually use in practice.

> > I wouldn't be so bold as to say that the MergeSort is certainly faster and that somebody else "ought" to use it, without having actually tried the technique first myself.
> 
> In other words, you don't have a clue, yet you're happy to spout off about code quality, sorting in general and the superiority of you novice code without any justification.

I have never implemented a MergeSort --- maybe I will do so for the next novice-package release. It is awkward right now, that I have two ways to sort lists, the InsertionSort for small lists, and the BIG-SORT (convert to and from an array of pointers) for big lists. It would be better to just have one list-sort function. I will still keep InsertionSort though, for the case where items are added to the list one at a time, and inserted into a sorted position --- this is actually a lot more common than building up an entire list unsorted, and then sorting it all in one fell swoop --- in my own programs that use list.4th, this is all that I've ever done.

Writing code for the novice package isn't just a way to benefit my legion of users (I don't actually have any users, afaik), but it is also a way for me to learn new stuff.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 13:12 -0700
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-06-25 23:48 -0700
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-06-26 09:11 -0700
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-06-26 02:03 -0700
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-06-26 11:25 -0500
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-06-26 12:36 -0700
      Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-06-26 09:49 -1000
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-26 20:24 +0000
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-06-26 20:23 +0000
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-26 13:35 -0700
      Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-26 16:37 -0700
        Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? The Beez <the.beez.speaks@gmail.com> - 2013-06-27 01:31 -0700
          Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-06-27 04:04 -0500
          Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-30 09:27 -0700
            Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-30 13:23 -0700
            Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-30 21:48 +0100
              Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-30 16:53 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-01 04:34 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-03 18:41 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-04 02:58 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-04 21:30 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-06 00:18 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-06 13:45 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-06 07:49 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-06 13:38 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-06 10:06 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-06 23:08 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 06:24 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 23:47 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-07 09:59 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 06:52 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-07 12:18 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-07-08 00:06 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-08 09:50 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? m.a.m.hendrix@tue.nl - 2013-07-08 03:14 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 09:53 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-09 14:25 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-09 23:39 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-09 18:03 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-10 23:05 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 03:21 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 10:29 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 05:44 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-10 04:07 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 06:06 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 14:21 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 04:45 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-10 03:13 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 05:09 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-10 12:16 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 10:38 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 06:45 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 13:56 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-10 10:54 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-10 13:57 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 07:15 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-10 13:52 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 15:00 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-07-10 16:13 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 17:07 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 10:53 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 10:40 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 15:17 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 16:54 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-12 03:07 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-07 00:43 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-07 00:21 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-06 20:32 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 06:38 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 07:05 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-07 13:00 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-07 09:47 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-07 21:22 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-07 19:25 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-07 21:58 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-08 02:27 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-08 21:18 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-09 04:20 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-10 10:30 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 15:13 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-10 13:57 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-10 16:57 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Elizabeth D Rather <erather@forth.com> - 2013-07-10 13:00 -1000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-10 22:19 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 10:23 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-11 01:12 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 00:33 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-07-11 11:48 +0200
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-07-11 03:08 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 05:00 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 10:17 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 06:53 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-11 15:21 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 10:37 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 17:07 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 15:19 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 17:33 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-11 18:18 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 16:46 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-12 03:48 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-12 10:55 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-12 19:29 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-15 09:50 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-12 13:22 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-13 20:05 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-14 11:34 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-14 09:18 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 16:05 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-07-15 06:12 +0300
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 22:17 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2013-07-15 11:44 +0300
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-15 09:42 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-16 18:03 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-17 00:54 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Howerd <howerdo@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-07-14 10:09 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-14 15:35 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-07-11 17:08 +0000
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-11 15:30 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-11 09:34 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Michael Morris <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-07-15 23:09 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-16 17:46 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-07-17 03:14 -0500
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-07-17 21:47 -0400
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-11 04:06 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-06 20:18 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-07 16:48 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-07 09:13 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-07-07 09:13 -0700
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? "Alex McDonald" <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-07 21:24 +0100
                Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-04 14:41 +0000
        Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-27 01:59 -0700
          Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? hughaguilar96@yahoo.com - 2013-06-30 09:30 -0700
            Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-06-30 12:59 -0700
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? awegel@arcor.de (Alex Wegel) - 2013-06-27 00:08 +0200
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-06-26 19:31 -0400
      Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2013-06-27 06:26 -0400
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-06-28 02:05 +0000
    Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-07-04 07:33 -0700
      Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Coos Haak <chforth@hccnet.nl> - 2013-07-05 00:47 +0200
        Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-14 19:01 +0000
          Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-07-15 01:28 +0000
        Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Ian Osgood <iano@quirkster.com> - 2013-07-19 11:29 -0700
  Re: Simple Sort - the smallest sorting routine? Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-07-19 09:09 -0700

csiph-web